how to do with it what to do with it Please ask the difference, really will help answer it

don't know how to do with it.I don't know how to do it with it.

don't know what to do with it.I don't know what to do with it.

The meaning of the two sentences is different, and it is common in the practical application of oral language2.

1 in do with is not an idiom collocation that means to do something with something. For example, write with a pen

In 2, do with is an idiom that means to handle.

i don't know how to make it.Speaking I don't know how to do it.

don't know what to make it syntax error and should be changed to i don't know what to make .

5 i don't know how to do it.I don't know how to do it.

The meaning is that I don't know what to do. It's just that the usage is inappropriate.

In my impression, do with is not used in conjunction with how.

Generally: how to deal with

what to do with

The meaning of the expression is also: I don't know how to do it.

And what can be the object, how cannot.

So among them, it should be:

3..i don't know how to make it.

4..i don't know what to make .

5..i don't know how to do it.

It's definitely not the same meaning, one is how to do it, and the other is what to do.

How should be followed by deal with

What is followed by do with

The difference between how to deal with and what to do with is that the reference is different, the syntax is different, and the emphasis is different.

First, the reference is different.

1. How to deal with: How to deal with.

2. what to do with:What to do.

Second, the grammar is different.

1. How to deal with: deal can also mean to "treat, handle" someone or something in a certain way according to the situation, which can refer to management, control or authoritative disposition, or it can refer to dealing with people or groups on a roughly equal basis.

2. What to do with: what is used as a relative pronoun, its meaning is "so..."of things". It can be used to guide the subject clause.

Predicative clause, object clause or copositional clause.

When the leading subject clause is introduced, the noun it refers to must be singular.

Third, the focus is different.

1. How to deal with:How to deal with it This is a question about the way adverbial, and what method to deal with.

2. What to do with:What to do with it is a question about the content, about it, how to deal with it - refers to what to do.

The match is correct.

1. What to do is complete (what is the object of do), indicating what to do, so the object cannot be added after the infinitive. Example sentence: i don't know what to do= i don't know what i can do .

I don't know what I can do.

2. How to do is incomplete (how to ask questions, interrogative pronouns), must be added as the object of do, table or pretend to show how to do, such as: can you tell me how to get there?Can you tell me how to get there?

It can be summed up as:

How to do it is the way to ask the high emptiness, which is what should be done after finishing the shirt and thinking about something;

What to do is what is done and what exactly should be done.

What to do and how to do it are both interrogative words and verb infinitive collocations, and the specific differences are as follows:

1 In English, what to do is used to do, where what is the object of do, so it cannot be added as the object after do.

2 In English, it is used to express "how to do this, how to do this", where how is an adverb as an adverb, it refers to something mentioned earlier, and do is a transitive verb, which is incomplete without it as an object.

For example: I know little about shopping online can you show me how to do it.

I don't know much about online shopping, can you teach me how to shop online?

Note: Prepositions cannot be missing in the structure of "interrogative pronoun + to + intransitive verb + preposition". Such as:

when i feel stressed, i don't know who to talk.(Error).

when i feel stressed, i don't know who to talk to.(Correct.) Talk to means "to follow."

The object of "talk" is the interrogative pronoun who, and without to, it becomes the intransitive verb talk, which is directly followed by who, which is obviously incorrect. ）