to evaluate what is the difference in Ronaldo s character

The so-called poor character refers to his fake fall, not really character.

For example, NBA Bowen, Battier, Scola, Ginobili and other players who like to fake the opponent's foul or defensive action are bigger.

Such players are easy to clash with others, making people feel that their skills are not too strong and they are more despicable.

Ronaldo's words are mainly to fake a foul to get a free kick.

On the other hand, he also has to have the skills to take free-kicks with confidence.

Therefore, Ronaldo is really not the so-called "poor character" at all, which some fans are not used to, so they use this to criticize him.

The game has only the result, not the process, and that's the cruelty.

As for the examples, there are more than 80% of Ronaldo's free kicks that are fakes.

But this kind of "character problem" will not bury his excellent skills.

Just like Zidane pushed Materazzi back then, everyone thinks this behavior is impulsive and shouldn't be, but can this affect his perfect Marseille maneuver? Can this affect his reputation as "Qi Zu"?

On the court, there is no such thing as a character problem.

By the way: the king of the ball lies in his achievements, not in the hand of God, which is just one of the more wonderful goals).

He is inattentive, the most important thing is that he fakes falls on the court, which violates the principle of fairness!

Whether Inzaghi is offside or not; Ronaldo is also forever on the edge of truth and falsehood.

If there's a difference, it's that sprinters don't always be able to accurately judge whether they're offside or not;

However, the person who fell is enough to know clearly whether he is a real fall or a fake fall every time......

Fortunately, it was already a big lead, but fortunately the opponent was only a derby, otherwise Ronaldo's fall would have caused another battle of words.

Don't treat Ronaldo as an idol or enemy, just as a player; Falls are not linked to quality or morality, but are analyzed as a phenomenon.

There are only two types of falls, 1, true falls; 2. Fake falls. There is no half-truth fall, because if there is a little bit of falsehood, it should be classified as a fake.

Some of Ronaldo's falls must be real and some fake, sometimes he gets a yellow card for a real fall, and of course, sometimes he wins a penalty for a fake fall.

Regarding falls, everyone has controversy, and Ronaldo has a lot of them. Ferguson did not deny the Portuguese's initial career of faking throws even when defending Ronaldo, in other words, Ronaldo is a "man with a criminal record" in the field of fake falls.

So the focus of the question is on: whether Ronaldo's confrontation with "habit becomes natural" has achieved a "change of heart".

Luo's achievements are undeniable, and indeed awesome. Active duty is also the top three. Tell the truth, you can't spray blindly.

But this point is blown by fans, and the team wins on its own. If I lose, I Luo has a goal, and my teammates can't help it. What fans are pursuing is the so-called resolute eyes (it is estimated that you can get pregnant at a glance) spiritual attributes (never admit defeat, it seems that other players are willing to lose, others don't show in front of the camera, if you want to chase this, it is better to chase Andy Lau's spiritual attributes are not strong?)

People are still modest and low-key).

Luo's character, playing on the pitch, what is this pie winning or losing is normal, who can always win. Snatching jerseys, penalties, free kicks, how can it be for your own data? It seems that as soon as he debuted, he was carrying No. 7 on his back?

Someone else's young player is willing? Pull it to the designation is unwilling. Mind!!

Like the door incident, as a big man in the sports world, is so open-minded, pattern? I didn't say anything about the 6th, 2nd, 3rd in a hurry, don't you think you can't catch up with the broken jar and break it, this is the so-called character.

There must be a degree of star chasing, the strength data is really good, but the character seems to be not bad.