Idealist or realist, which is more short sighted?

I think realists are more short-sighted, because they are too realistic, they only see what is in front of them, and they don't think about what will happen in the future, which will make them not pursue, and idealists will always pursue what they want, which will make them better.

I think between the idealist and the realist, the idealist is more short-sighted. Because I think idealists can only imagine their future based on their current lives, but plans can't keep up with changes, so I think idealists are more short-sighted.

I think idealists and realists, I think realists are more short-sighted, because they only see the immediate benefits, and they don't think about the long-term future, whereas idealists are able to see the long-term future.

Idealists and realists, I think idealists are shorter because they only indulge in ideals and do not care about real life, I think it is very short-sighted.

I think it should be regarded as a realist, because a realist will only see the immediate benefits, in fact, I think the vision is still relatively short-sighted, but the idealist idea will be a little more jumpy.

Which is shorter, an idealist or a realist, I think it should be an idealist, he is not realistic, he just thinks about how to achieve his ideals. It's unrealistic, so I think it's more short-sighted.

There are many people who are realists and some people who are idealists, and I think realists are more short-sighted, because they don't have any ideals to pursue, they are only satisfied with the reality of the situation, so their vision is limited.

It's idealism. Realism is very good, and now Ruyi has a certain material basis that can make you very realistic. Idealism, this is illusory, is something that you get through constant effort.

Actually, I think it should be realists, because such people can only see some immediate benefits, but not what will happen in the future.

As for the idealist or the realist, which is shorter, I feel that it should be a realist, because the more realistic people are favored by the sky, and the embassy sees the problem more simply.

An idealist is a person who values the future and pursues ideals; Realists are people who value reality and pay attention to reality.

1. Reality and ideals.

Ideal and reality are a pair of categories in the philosophy of life.

Ideal is the rational pursuit of a better future that people can achieve through struggle; Reality is something that has a reality, that is, something that actually exists.

2. Attitude towards life:

People's attitudes towards ideals and reality are different, so a division between idealists and realists is formed. To put it simply: an idealist is a person who values the future and pursues ideals; Realists are people who value reality and pay attention to reality.

Idealists prefer to look forward and change things around them, it is easy to be unrealistic, realists are more realistic, they don't listen to other people's paintings, they look at what you are now, some people believe in what others will be in the future, how it is, that is idealism. Some people value what you have now, which is reality

Realism believes that the truth of the world is what the great British thinker Hobbes said about the jungle society, where there are no laws, no rules, no consensus, no trust, only the war of all against all. Everything is false, only survival, interests, and power are real, and the three are one and the same.

Idealism is a transcendence of realism: we don't have to be jungle societies. The war of all against all can only lead to common destruction, and we should be able to jump out of the trap. Coexistence on the basis of trust, consensus, and rules, compatible interests.

Realism believes that reality is bloody, and idealism believes that it doesn't have to be this way.

Realism believes that idealism is pedantic, and choosing idealism is tantamount to sitting back and watching others destroy it.

Idealism believes that realism is dangerous, and that choosing realism will eventually lead to common destruction.

Realism runs through the centuries-old modern history of Europe, leading to two world wars and a reshuffling of the world.

Modern elites establish multilateral rules between nations, prevent wars, establish the United Nations, the World Bank, international organizations...

Three stages of development of international politics:

the first stage, the international political relations of offensive realism;

the second stage, defensive realism in international political relations between the great powers;

The third stage, after World War II, is rule-based international relations.

There may be atavism now, and offensive realism is back on the stage, putting the world at risk of dimensionality reduction.

Idealism believes that cooperation based on consensus on rules leads to security, realism believes that it can only rely on itself, and the most extreme offensive realism believes that security is a zero-sum game.

This is not only a development of international politics, but also an inspiration for individual survival.

As an individual in the real world, are you a realist who supports the law of the forest, survival of the fittest, and the strong are always strong, or are you an idealist, striving to establish multi-party competition and survival rules to create a win-win ecosystem?

This article is mainly excerpted from Wang Shuo's cognitive upgrade.

The civilization of the world has always been driven by idealists, who can laugh at the naïve, impulsive, irrational, megalomaniacal, trying to be a savior, and even risking thousands of human lives for experiments thousands of years later, but the doubts and contempt from the commanding heights of history cannot hide the brilliance of their transcendence of human nature.

An ideological tendency that is higher than reality and can adjust to reality can also be transformed into a social movement when it encounters the right environment. The combination of practice is necessary for idealism, and the blueprint designed for mankind can only prove the value of ideals if it blossoms and bears fruit in the experimental field of society as a whole. Transforming the world is both the goal of idealism and its primary significance.

Features:

1. Idealist People are interested in the meaning, relationships, and possibilities of things, and make decisions based on their personal values. This is a group of people who care about personal growth and how to understand others and themselves.

2. Idealist The principle of being a man is: to be true to oneself, and to be the most philosophical person in spirit among the four types. Idealists are open to new ideas and are accommodating to others.

3. Idealists seem to be forever searching for the meaning of existence. They are very much admired for truth and integrity in people and in all kinds of relationships, and they are prone to idealizing others. Many idealists instinctively like to help others grow and progress.

Idealists are great communicators and are considered to be catalysts for positive change.

4. They are born to understand the emotions of others and care about the needs of the people they meet in life and work (such as colleagues, patients or customers, employees).

The biggest drawback is turning a blind eye to the reality of the situation. That is:

Too much emphasis is placed on the role of the ideal situation in changing the situation.

Take the ideal situation as the only solution.

Ignoring initiative.

Living in an ideal is too unrealistic and detached from reality.

In fact, we are also very idealistic, and we look at everything too idealistic on campus, and we can't see the cruelty of society clearly. I'm like this, I don't know if I'm living in an ideal, I always want to have a normal heart, but I can't do it myself, I can only do a dream with a normal heart to look at the injustices in the world, but I will try to be realistic, hehe, there are a lot of words.

1.Sensitive to other people's emotions, able to understand and experience other people's feelings, good at comforting and encouraging others2Sensitive to words and language.

3.Good at analyzing and summarizing.

4.Good at grasping things holistically.

5.Able to understand complex theoretical concepts, good at conceptualizing things, and good at deducing principle 6Good at strategic thinking 1

There is a tendency to decide things based solely on personal likes and dislikes or values, and to expect others to approach problems from the same perspective or standards.

2.Sometimes they are so preoccupied with other people's problems that they may become so caught up in them that they are troubled by them.

3.Sometimes it's easy to idealize others or things and not be practical enough.

4.Not particularly good at disciplining and criticizing others, although often self-critical. Sometimes they sacrifice their own opinions or interests for the sake of peace.

5.Some idealists are more emotionally active and have greater mood swings.