Prove 2n 18 n 2 8n 8 by mathematical induction

Updated on society 2024-02-09
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    There is no condition for n given in the problem, assuming that n is a positive integer.

    2n-18=4), i.e., 2k-180 when n=k+1 (k>=4), (k+1) 2-8(k+1)+8)-(2*(k+1)-18).

    k^2+2k+2-8k-8+8)-(2k+2-18)k^2+2k+2-8k-2k+16

    k^2-8k+18

    k^2-10k+2k+26-8

    k^2-10k+26+2k-8

    2k-8 (k^2-10k+26>0)

    Because k>=4, 2k-8>=0

    So ((k+1) 2-8(k+1)+8)-(2*(k+1)-18)>0

    i.e. 2*(k+1)-18 < k+1) 2-8(k+1)+8 Therefore, when n=k+1 (k>=4), the inequality holds.

    In summary, 2n-18

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The inequality is true when n=1 is proved first, and then it is true when n=k is assumed, and the hypothesis is proved when n=k+1 is true.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    When n=1 is 2*1-18=-16 and 1 -8*1+8=1, the inequality is obviously true.

    n=2 at ......

    n=3……n=4……

    n=5……Suppose that when n=k(k>=5), 2k-8+1>=3 when 2k-18=5, there is 2<2k-8+1

    2k-18 again, so 2k-18+2

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Proof: 2(n-9)<(n-4) 2

    When n=0, the -18<16 proposition holds.

    When n=1, the -16<9 proposition holds.

    When n=9, the proposition 0<25 holds.

    Suppose that the proposition is true when n=k (k n0, k is a natural number) and also when n=k+1 2(k-8)<(k-3) 2 is also true as above.

    Hence 2n-18

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    sn=n(n+1)(2n+1)/6。

    The process is as follows:

    an = n²

    sn = 1² +2² +3² +n² =n(n+1)(2n+1)/6

    Inductive proof:

    n = 1, 1 (1+1) (2 1+1) 6 = 6 6 = 1, the sum formula is correct.

    When n = k, sk = 1 +2 +3 +k = k(k+1)(2k+1) 6 holds.

    s(k+1) =k(k+1)(2k+1)/6+(k+1)²

    k+1)[k(2k+1)/6+(k+1)]

    k+1)[k(2k+1)+6k+6]/6

    k+1)[2k²+7k+6]/6

    k+1)[(k+2)(2k+3]/6

    k+1)[(k+1)+1][2(k+1)+1]/6

    Proven. Additional Information:

    1)(a+b)³=a³+3a²b+3ab²+b³

    2)a³+b³=a³+a²b-a²b+b³=a²(a+b)-b(a²-b²)=a²(a+b)-b(a+b)(a-b)

    a+b)[a-b(a-b)]=a+b) hall withered (a-ab+b).

    3) a -b = a -a b + a marketing b-b = a (a-b) + b (a -b) = a (a-b) + b (a + b) (a-b).

    a-b)[a²+b(a+b)]=a-b)(a²+ab+b²)

    4)(a-b)³=a³-3a²b+3ab²-b³

    a-b)³=a-b)(a-b)²=a-b)(a²-2ab+b²)=a³-3a²b+3ab²-b³

    The most simple and common mathematical induction.

    is to prove that when n is equal to any natural number.

    A certain proposition is true. The proof is in two steps:

    1. Prove that the proposition is true when n = 1.

    2. Assuming that the proposition is true when n=m, then it can be deduced that the proposition is also true when n=m+1. (m stands for any natural number).

    The principle of this method is to first prove that the proposition is true at a certain starting value, and then to prove that the process from one value to the next is valid. When both of these points have been proven, then any value can be deduced by using this method repeatedly.

    Think of this approach as a domino effect.

    Maybe it's easier to understand.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    When Zheng n=1, the left finch is dismantled = 1 + 2 * 1 = 2 and the right is = 1 * (1 * 2 + 1) = 3

    The equation holds. When n=k is assumed, the equation holds.

    i.e. 1+2+...2k=k(2k+1)

    Then when n=k+1.

    Left = 1+2+.2n+(2n+1)+(2n+2)(1+2n+2)*(2n+2)/2

    n+1)*(2n+3)

    The equation also holds.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    n=1 Left Burning Empty Side = 1 6 Right = 1 6 Formation n=2 Left Side = 1 4 Right Ming Banquet Side = 2 9 Formation Setting Setting N=k (k>=2) True.

    1 2-1 (k+2)=2 1 ((k+2)(k+3)),2,n=1 left =1 6 right =1 6 true.

    n=2 Left=1 4=9 36 Right=2 9 =8 36 Left>> Right.

    The inequality does not hold.

    For example, 1 2-1 (n+2) (n+2) 18, then n (n+2) (n+2) 9

    n-1)(n-4)≥0

    n 4 or n 1,2,

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    When n=1, the left = 1 2 = 1 right = 1 * (1 + 1) * (2 + 1) The slag rent key is 6 = 1; Let n=k become immediate: Liang Ye 1 2+2 2+....+k 2=k(k+1)(2k+1) 6 then 1 2+2 2+....+k^2+(k+1)^2=k(k+1)(2k+1)/6+(k^2+2k+1)=(2k^3+3k^2+k+6k^2+12k+6)/6=(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)/6=(k+1)[(k+1)+1...

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    n=2 ((n+1)/2)^n= [2+1)/2]^2= n!=2*1=2 So((n+1) 2) n> n!Establish.

    n>2 Suppose n=k holds the original formula, i.e., ((k+1) 2) k> k!i.e. (k+1) k 2 k>k!(1)

    Then n=k+1, ((k+1+1) 2) (k+1)=(k+2) (k+1) (2*2 k).2)

    Cause(k+2) (k+1)>2(k+1) (k+1).3)

    3) Substituting (2) (k+1+1) 2) (k+1)=(k+2) (k+1) (2*2 k)>2(k+1) (k+1) (2*2 k)=(k+1) (k+1) 2 k=(k+1)*(k+1) k 2 k(4)

    Substituting (1) into (4) gives ((k+1+1) 2) (k+1)>(k+1)*k!=(k+1)!i.e. n=k+1((n+1) 2) n > n!Establish.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    2 n-1) stool slip judgment (2 n+1)>n (n ten1) (n 3, n jujube to n+), 1-2 (2 n+1)> 1-1 (n+1), 2 (2 n+1).

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Simply write: n=1 2+2>1 is true.

    This is true if n=k.

    2^k+2>k^2

    n=k+12^(k+1)+2-(k+1)^2=2*2^k+2-k^2+2k+1

    2^k+(2^k+2-k^2)+2k+1 k>02^k+2>k^2

    So 2 (k+1)+2-(k+1) 2>0 so for k+1 also holds. Proven.

Related questions
10 answers2024-02-09

Is there a problem with the topic? 1+2+3+4+……n=n(n 1) 2 proves: When n 1, the left side of the equation = 1, and the right side of the equation = 1, assuming that n = k is true, i.e., >>>More

8 answers2024-02-09

Mathematical induction proves that (1-h) n 1 (1+hn) holds for any natural number n in the range of 0 h 1. >>>More

3 answers2024-02-09

Rational numbers – comparison: a=0, |a|=0 a>0,|a|=a a<0,|a|=-a >>>More

2 answers2024-02-09

888 Pack: 1-69 10 Trumpet Liver Burst Event Level 60: 60-69 1 Male Law Level Event Level 61: >>>More

8 answers2024-02-09

Mathematics is a way of thinking logically for people, and it is a summary of people's rational methods for studying various problems. >>>More