How to judge the problem of non motorized vehicles rubbing with motor vehicles! Good additional poin

After reading the landlord's speech, first of all, there is no problem that the landlord is fully responsible.

What's the problem? Ever heard of "hit-and-run"? The landlord's problem is here, one is that the landlord's behavior caused actual damage to the motor vehicle driven by the other party's driver (the severity is not considered for the time being), and the landlord himself drove away from the scene directly without the two parties ** and consultation, this kind of behavior, compared with "escape", is the same in principle.

If the landlord is a traffic policeman, or understands the relevant laws and regulations, he will not see it this way.

Tomorrow, if you are hit by someone else and the other party ignores you, you can also call the police, and the other party will call it "escape" and be fully responsible. And the insurance company is not responsible for compensation.

Uncle traffic police is right, thank you Uncle traffic police for giving us all (including the landlord himself) another vivid on-site teaching lesson.

I don't think it's necessary to be very clear about a little thing like this.

In the event of an accident between a motor vehicle and a non-motor vehicle, the motor vehicle shall bear economic responsibility within the compulsory traffic insurance. That is to say, no matter whose responsibility it is, as long as it is within the limit of compulsory insurance, the economic loss should be borne by the motor vehicle.

You are non-motorized, don't be afraid.

This kind of small accident is mediated, if the landlord pays a little money in order to buy a quiet, it will be forgotten. If the other lion opens his mouth, you ignore him. The traffic police can only make a determination of responsibility, and cannot force any party to compensate.

If the other party does not give up, ignore him and let him go to court to sue. It's not as cheap as him.

Sometimes, the easiest way is the best way. The most unreasonable method is the most effective.

I'll be fair. You have no objections

You deserved to be hit.

Just because of the unruly electric car like you, it causes so many traffic accidents, and you can't go anywhere.

Absolute hit-and-run.

You can do it for yourself in the futureWhen you meet a drunk motor vehicle and use the accelerator as a brake, you will die.

I especially control the mood I want to scold you.

Hello landlord! It's your fault!

You take full responsibility and there will be no objections!

Even if, "After being chased by B for a while, A stops the car in a place where he thinks it is safe and comes out to ask what is going on, and then follows B to the front of B's car to check." ”

That's the first thing you go!

In fact, you don't even have a chance to refute this matter!

Just like the brother on the first floor said!

But I'm curious, why did you leave after the accident?

Maybe you stayed at the time and explained things clearly, and there was still a discussion about it!

Now it's good! You can't tell.

Isn't this equivalent to a "hit-and-run"?

You can't get out of it for any reason.

Judging from the current situation, even if you go to court!

To put it mildly, you have little chance of winning!

In the future, grow a brain, don't run beforehand, stay and figure things out before deciding to stay!

How is it? Don't deny it.

If you have a brain in everything, you won't suffer!

I hope my words will enlighten you.

A is at the intersection but does not take the road he is driving normally on, and uses the motorway to pass between the two vehicles. It is a dangerous act in itself. As an adult, you should be able to foresee the possibility of an accident if 3 cars come from behind, A may not be able to dodge in time.

Therefore, the division of responsibility in this case is very clear. A's full responsibility. As for the escape after the fact, it was mainly because A's behavior did not show an attitude towards the handling of the accident.

After learning of the accident, no matter what the reason, he did not take the initiative to deal with the accident, but instead drove on, so it can be interpreted as a hit-and-run. If A is forced to stop, he says he didn't know about it before, and now he has to deal with the accident actively. Then it can also not be interpreted as a hit-and-run.

However, it should be noted here that since A is an electric vehicle, not a motor vehicle, A's hit-and-run does not involve criminal liability. The final result is that A fully compensates B for the cost of repairing the car and the cost of lost work.

In addition, the landlord, the traffic safety law should be carefully studied! If you hit B at a zebra crossing, it's the other way around.

Legal analysis: Motor vehicle refers to a wheeled vehicle that is driven or towed by a power unit and driven on the road for personnel or for transporting goods and carrying out special engineering operations. Non-motorized vehicles refer to vehicles driven by human or animal power and driven on the road, as well as motorized wheelchairs and electric bicycles for the disabled that are driven by power units but are designed to meet the relevant national standards for the maximum speed, the quality of the empty vehicle, and the external dimensions meet the relevant national standards.

Legal basis: "Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China" Article 119 The meaning of the following terms in this Law: (1) "Road draft" refers to highways, urban roads, and places where social motor vehicles are allowed to pass although they are within the jurisdiction of the unit, including squares, public parking lots, and other places used for public traffic.

2) "Vehicle" means motor vehicle and non-motor vehicle. (3) "Motor vehicle" refers to a wheeled vehicle that is driven or towed by a power unit and driven on the road for personnel or for transporting goods and carrying out special engineering operations. (4) "Non-motorized vehicles" refers to vehicles that are driven by human or animal power and driven on the road, as well as motorized wheelchairs, electric bicycles and other means of transportation for the disabled that are driven by power units but are designed to meet the relevant national standards in terms of maximum speed, empty mass and dimensions.

5) "Traffic accident" refers to the incident of personal or property damage caused by the fault or accident of the vehicle on the road.

1. Non-motorized vehicles rely on manpower or animal power to drive, such as bicycles, human-powered tricycles, electric bicycles, etc., while motor vehicles want to start, relying on power unit drive or traction, such as common cars.

2. The one with the engine in the vehicle is a motor vehicle, and the one without an engine is a non-motor vehicle.

3. The use of gasoline and diesel is a motor vehicle digging belt, and those who do not need to use these oils are non-motor vehicles. Grip macro.

The different regulations for motor vehicles and non-motor vehicles are as follows:

1. Motor vehicles include all kinds of automobiles, trolleybuses, battery cars Liang Xiang, motorcycles, agricultural transport vehicles, wheeled special mechanical vehicles, wheeled tractor groups, walk-behind tractor groups, walk-behind tractor deformation conveyors, and towed semi-trailers and full trailers.

2. Non-motorized vehicles include bicycles, tricycles, rickshaws, animal laughing finger bikes, special vehicles for the disabled, electric bicycles, etc.

Article 119 of the Road Traffic Safety Law.

For the purposes of this Act, the following terms have the meanings:

1) Roads refer to highways, urban roads and places that allow social motor vehicles to pass although they are within the jurisdiction of the unit, including squares, public parking lots and other places used for public traffic.

2) "Vehicle" means motor vehicle and non-motor vehicle.

(3) "Motor vehicle" refers to a wheeled vehicle that is driven or towed by a power unit and driven on the road for personnel or for transporting goods and carrying out special engineering operations.

(4) "Non-motorized vehicles" refers to vehicles that are driven by human or animal power and driven on the road, as well as motorized wheelchairs, electric bicycles and other means of transportation for the disabled that are driven by power units but are designed to meet the relevant national standards in terms of maximum speed, empty mass and dimensions.

5) "Traffic accident" refers to the incident of personal or property damage caused by the fault or accident of the vehicle on the road.

Well, if you have a driver's license and procedures, and if you have all the insurance, your responsibility is not big, and the insurance company should lose money, and it will help you repair the car.

If an electric vehicle collides with a motor vehicle on the roadway, the police will judge the motor vehicle as the main responsibility. Inside.

If there is a collision between the front of the vehicle and the electric vehicle, the motor vehicle is primarily responsible. If the rear of the vehicle collides with an electric vehicle, the electric vehicle is primarily responsible.

Standards for determining the liability for scratches between motor vehicles and non-motor vehicles:

In the event of a traffic accident between a motor vehicle and a non-motor vehicle driver or pedestrian, and the non-motor vehicle driver or pedestrian is not at fault, the motor vehicle shall be liable for compensation; If there is evidence to prove that the driver or pedestrian of the non-motor vehicle is at fault, the liability of the motor vehicle party shall be appropriately reduced according to the degree of fault; If the motor vehicle party is not at fault, it shall bear no more than 10% of the liability for compensation.

If the loss of a traffic accident is caused by a non-motor vehicle driver or pedestrian intentionally colliding with a motor vehicle, the motor vehicle party shall not be liable for compensation.

If your front door collides with her, you're more responsible. The back door must be his responsibility. If the amount does not exceed 1,000 yuan, it is best to pay out of pocket. Because you have a little money now, you will definitely be given a premium increase next year.

Hello to the electric car if it collides with you on the road of the motor vehicle, the police will judge it.

Your main responsibility and the following responsibilities Besides, it is a collision at the right rear door Maybe the responsibility will be half open The insurance company can pay for the medical expenses or anything can be insured Go to the traffic police force is to negotiate and solve the landlord's attitude must be good Let others be embarrassed to ask you for more money But the necessary mental compensation should still be appropriately given I wish you a smooth journey!! Feel free to ask.

1.If the other party does not take the accident certificate, the traffic police can issue an accident certificate after ascertaining the cause of the accident.

2.Traffic Accident Compensation Items:

Traffic accident compensation generally includes the following:

If the victim is injured but not disabled, medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, hospital meal allowances, necessary nutrition expenses, etc.

If the victim is disabled due to injury, medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, hospital meal allowances, necessary nutrition expenses, disability compensation, disability assistive device expenses, living expenses of dependents, compensation for mental damages, and necessary expenses, nursing expenses, and follow-up expenses actually incurred due to nursing care and continuation.

Evidence of the classification of traffic accident personal injury compensation items in Zhejiang and their requirements.

Due to the limited conditions of online communication, we cannot accurately and comprehensively understand your case, for your benefit, we recommend that you bring relevant materials to the law firm for consultation.

Full responsibility, the first you are speeding, the second you did not overtake under the premise of ensuring that you can safely overtake and caused the accident, the third scene has been destroyed, and the first scene cannot be restored, you are fully responsible for these points. You have insured 500,000 yuan of compulsory traffic insurance and third-party liability insurance, with a total insurance amount of 620,000 yuan, if you become a vegetative person and have been in the hospital**, your 620,000 yuan is not enough to compensate. If he dies within a few days, then the damage should be able to be dealt with within 620,000; The key is that you have to bear criminal responsibility, in order to reduce your criminal responsibility, you have to spend money to buy a letter of commitment from the families of the three, these overpaid expenses will not be compensated by the insurance company, and the medical expenses incurred in the hospital are reimbursed by the insurance company according to the local medical insurance regulations, like your case, I estimate that there must be a lot of non-medical insurance costs in the medical expenses, and the gap between the medical expenses will be very large, you can take the list of expenses in advance to the insurance company you are insured to consult.

You're talking about a country road, where the center line comes from, and if there's a center line, like your icon, you're also responsible.

Equally, after all, you're not at fault, and the aftermath is handled well.