In the article Huizi Xiangliang , what social attitude of Zhuangzi is expressed?

This is mainly about Zhuangzi's satirical and cynical attitude towards villains.

In this article, I talked about Zhuangzi, and I have a bit of an attitude of looking down on people, so I am more negative and jealous.

It shows that Zhuangzi is very sad about the changes in society, and he does not want society to be like this.

In today's society, Zhuang Zhou is lonely and there are people like King Liang Hui, whether it is a dead rat or not.

It expresses Zhuangzi's somewhat dissatisfied, conceited, and arrogant attitude towards people in the society at that time.

showed his disdain for fame and fortune. At the same time, he satirized people like Keiko.

People at different levels have different views on things, and there will be a type of person who is too small and lives with his own heart.

It shows that Zhuangzi is dissatisfied with the society, and many are dissatisfied, so he writes a lot of dissatisfaction in Keiko Xiangliang.

Huizi is beaming, and Zhuangzi is going to see it. Or Huizi said: "Zhuangzi comes, and he wants to replace his son." So Keiko was afraid and searched in the country for three days and three nights. Zhuangzi saw him and said: "There is a bird in the south, and its name is the Bird, what does the son know?"

The owl originates in the South China Sea and flies in the North Sea; Non-sycamore, non-practice and non-food, non-liquor and no drink. So the squirrel got rid of the rats, and the peans passed over them, and looked up at them and said, 'Frightened! 'This son wants to scare me with the Liang Kingdom of the son? ”

Careless Hui Shi was the minister of state in Liang State, Zhuangzi went to visit him. Someone told Hui Shi: "Zhuangzi came to Liang to replace you as prime minister. So Hui Shi was very frightened, so he searched the capital for three days and three nights.

Zhuangzi went to see him and said, "There is a bird in the south, and its name is the Gully, do you know it?" The parrot took off from the South China Sea and was going to fly to the North Sea; If it is not a plane tree, it will not live, if it is not a bamboo tree, it will not be eaten, and if it is not a sweet spring, it will not be drunk.

At this moment the harrier eagle picked up a rancid mouse, and the pelotin flew in front of it

The harrier eagle saw it and looked up and said, 'Drink!' 's rebuke. Do you also want to use your Liang State phase to intimidate me now? In the allegorical passage, Zhuangzi compares himself to a pelotin and Huizi to an owl

Compare fame and fortune to rotting rats, tableMing despised his position and interest in fame and fortune, and bitterly ridiculed the faces of those who were obsessed with fame and wealth, showing Zhuangzi's attitude towards fame and fortune.

The story develops unexpectedly, the characters are in stark contrast, and the metaphors are clever and appropriate, and the effect is concise and rich. People at different levels have different views on things, whether in society or in the workplace, <>

There will be a type of people who think that others also love things because their pattern is too small, or they treat others with their own hearts. I made a lot of imaginary enemies out of my own way, guarded against this and that all day long, and created a lot of contradictions.

Zhuangzi was very dissatisfied with this society, and he dared not speak out.

Zhuangzi and Huizi swim on the beam", in the text, the cognitive attitudes of Zhuangzi and Huizi are: Huizi argues strongly, Zhuangzi argues skillfully; Huizi seeks truth, Zhuangzi is beautiful; Huizi is obsessive, and Zhuangzi is detached.

Both sides of the debate are on topic, but the debaters think very differently. Hui Shi is from the law of cognition, people and fish are two different creatures, and it is impossible for people to feel the joys, sorrows, and sorrows of fish. Zhuang Zhou is from the perspective of artistic laws, people are happy and fish are happy.

From the perspective of cognitive laws, Zhuang Zhou's logical reasoning is pure sophistry, but this kind of sophistry is not disgusting, because Zhuang Zhou completely looks at the world with an artistic mentality, a typical "empathy" effect, Zhuang Zhou transplants his own happiness to the emotions of the fish, which in turn sets off Zhuang Zhou's happiness.

The two sides used the method of attacking the shield of the son with the spear of the son, and the debate was deepened in the most serious way. Zhuang Zhou affirmed that he could know the joy of fish, but Hui Shi denied Zhuang Zhou's statement. Not to mention who is right and wrong in this debate, just the quick thinking and wise conversation reflected by the two in the debate are amazing, giving people a pleasant and intellectual enjoyment.

Zhuangzi and Huizi.

Original. 惠子相 (xiàng) Liang, Zhuangzi went to see it. Or Keiko said:

Zhuangzi came, and wanted to replace the son. So Huizi was afraid and searched in the country for three days and three nights. Zhuangzi saw him and said:

There is a bird in the south, its name is gr (yuān chú), and the child knows it? The husband grows in the South China Sea and flies in the North Sea; Non-sycamore, non-practice, non-food, non-lien (lǐ) springs do not drink. So the owl (chī) got the rotting rat, and the g chick passed it, and looked up at it and said:

Scared (hè)!This son wants to scare me with the Liang country of the son (yé)?

Translation: Huizi was the prime minister of the Liang state, and Zhuangzi went to visit him. Someone told Huizi: "Zhuangzi Liang Guo is here, and he wants (or wants) to replace you as prime minister."

So Keiko was very scared and searched in the national capital for three days and three nights. Zhuangzi went to see him and said, "There is a bird in the south, its name is grung, do you know it?"

GR takes off from the South China Sea and flies to the North Sea, not the sycamore tree does not inhabit, not the bamboo that does not eat, not the sweet spring water that does not drink. At this moment, a harrier eagle picked up a rancid rat, flew past it, looked up at it, and let out a 'frightened' angry scold. Do you want to use your Liang Kingdom (phase) to intimidate me now?

Notes Huizi: Huibu Shishi, a native of the Song Dynasty during the Warring States Period, a philosopher, and a friend of Zhuangzi.

Phase: A person who assists the monarch, equivalent to the prime minister of later generations. It is used here as a verb, meaning to be prime minister.

Xiang Liang: He was the prime minister of the Wei State. Another name after the Wei State moved its capital to Daliang (now Kaifeng, Henan) during the Warring States Period.

Or: Yes.

Fear: Fear. Country: The capital of the country.

To: Go. gr (yuānchú): r, ancient with "chick". GR is a bird like a phoenix in ancient legends, and its habits are noble.

Stop: Perch. Lian Shi: Bamboo, that is, the seeds of bamboo.

醴 (lǐ) spring: Ganquan, sweet spring water. Li: Sweet.

And so: at this time.

鸱 (chī): Harrier eagle. Infused with wandering, the owl is not the owl, the owl is the owl.

Frightened (hè): Imitates the angry sound of an owl. The word "frightened" below is used as a verb.

夫 (fú): The beginning of a sentence is a modal word, which can be translated as that gr.

Three: imaginary fingers many times.

In the article "Zhuangzi and Huizi Swim in Haoliang", he agrees with Huizi's view.

Keiko is argumentative, analytical, and has a cognitive mindset about things. There is a cognitive attitude towards things that are rooted in the roots, focusing on the ** of knowledge. Zhuangzi believes that the "happiness" of fish is actually the projection and externalization of his pleasant state of mind.

Logically, it was Keiko who had the upper hand. Because Zhuangzi is a strong word; If formally, it was Zhuangzi who prevailed. Because after Zhuangzi said it, Huizi had nothing to refute.

Zhuangzi is intellectual, spiritual, advocating beauty, understanding the outside world, with an appreciative attitude, and exerting the internal subjective emotions to external objects to produce the role of empathy and empathy.

Huizi is debating, stubborn, realistic, and has a cognitive attitude towards things, focusing on the best degree of knowledge.

Zhuangzi is intellectual, spiritual, advocating beauty, understanding the outside world, with an appreciative attitude, and empathizing with empathy generated by applying internal subjective emotions to external objects.

If Keiko has the personality of a logician, then Zhuangzi has the style of an artist.

I feel that Zhuangzi is fooling Huizi, turning people who want to know how you know about it to where you know, and changing people's problems.

Lesson 21 of the second volume of the eighth grade, "Zhuangzi and Huizi Swim on the Haoliang" is explained. Feel the art of argumentation.

Zhuangzi and Huizi play together on the bridge in Haoshui. Zhuangzi said: "How leisurely the perch swims in the river, this is the happiness of the fish."

Keiko said, "You're not a fish, how do you know the happiness of a fish?" Zhuangzi said:

You're not me, how do you know I don't know the happiness of fish? Keiko said, "I am not you, so I don't know what you think; You are not a fish in the first place, and you don't know the happiness of fish, but you can be completely sure.

Zhuangzi said, "Please start with our original topic. You say, 'You know the joy of fish from **,' and so on, and since you already know that I know the joy of fish, but you ask me, so I said I knew it on the bridge in the water.

Zhuangzi insisted that the fish that "swim calmly" are happy, which is actually a projection and reflection of his happy state of mind. It also reflects Zhuangzi's idea of advocating "nature" and opposing "man-made". Keiko's point of view is that you are not a fish, you don't know the joy of fish, and you don't realize that people have the ability to think, to know and transform the world

You are not a fish, you don't know the joy of fish, you don't realize that people have the ability to think, to know and transform the world.