Steps to write literary criticism, how to conduct literary criticism

Reading: Reading is a process of appropriation of material and investigation in the criticism of literary works. It is only through reading that a strong foundation for writing can be built. From the perspective of the writing requirements of literary work criticism, reading should be both point-to-point and comprehensive.

Candidates should choose the criteria for good reviews. The angle of the review should be determined according to personal expertise and hobbies, and you should choose what you are familiar with, what you are sure of, what you have experience, and what you can comment on. It is necessary to develop strengths and avoid weaknesses and determine the comment center.

It must be established with one's own unique opinion and insight into the work. When setting the question, on the basis of reading the work, through the candidate's thinking, it is necessary to complete the perceptual understanding.

The process of ascent to the "leap" of rational understanding.

Comment: First of all, look at what the work says, be clear about what the work reflects, and connect the author's experience with your own. Secondly, clarifying the theme of the work requires a careful and careful reading of the work and a correct comment on the theme of the work.

Thirdly, candidates must pay attention to how the work is expressed, whether it is well expressed, candidates should pay attention to the skills used in the expression process of the work, and evaluate the expression skills of the work to best reflect the candidate's professional level. The evaluation of the quality of the work is largely subjective, if the author's artistic expression can be correctly judged and due evaluation can be made, it will be approved and appreciated by the examiner. Finally, to find out the innovation of the work, a review of a literary work can only be called a good literary review work if it correctly points out the cognitive and artistic value of the work.

Writing: A review of a literary work must have the characteristics of a discussion, but because it is a review of the work, it must have a bit of a literary color. Therefore, a good review of literary works should have a correct and clear point of view, and use scientific and logical reasoning on the basis of accurate, sufficient and convincing arguments.

In short, we should try to pay attention to the fact that the language of literary criticism should be accurate, rigorous, scientific and theoretical; It should also be distinctive, novel, literary, and vivid. Through the use of language, the reason, emotion, and text of the commentary should be perfectly combined.

Writing Essentials. 1. Strengthen the literacy of literary and artistic theories, and master the scientific evaluation standards;

2. Carefully analyze literary and artistic phenomena and put forward innovative theoretical views;

Literary and artistic criticism, also known as literary criticism, is an article in which a critic expounds and evaluates literary and artistic creation, literary and artistic trends of thought, and other literary and artistic phenomena and literary and artistic practice activities on the basis of literary and artistic appreciation and under the guidance of certain literary and artistic theories, and is the embodiment of the critic's scientific and rational understanding.

The direct objects of literary and artistic criticism include writers, artists, literary and artistic works, literary and artistic trends, literary and artistic schools, literary and artistic theories, literary and artistic movements, literary and artistic history, and the phenomenon of readers' appreciation and acceptance.

Literary and artistic criticism, following the policy of "a hundred flowers blooming and a hundred schools of thought contending", reveals the aesthetic value and ideological significance of the object of criticism through the specific analysis of literary and artistic practices and literary phenomena, and the artistic methods and internal laws of literary and artistic creation.

1. It needs to meet the basic requirements of the group.

1. Meet the stylistic requirements, and the appreciation and analysis essay is a discussion, and cannot be written in other styles.

3. The structure is complete, one is the form of the article is complete, and the other is the integrity of the content of the article (that is, the arguments and arguments of a discussion are essential).

1. Author. The author's motivation for writing, the author's psychological journey and Qi Zhengkuan's life experience, whether there have been adventures, etc.

2. Works. The characteristics of the work itself, which works have similarities with them, what they express, etc.

3. Background of the times. A work is inextricably linked to the era in which it was born. It can reflect the system and atmosphere of the society at that time.

Reading for literary criticism is a process of appropriation of material and investigation and research. It is only through reading that a strong foundation for writing can be built. From the perspective of the writing requirements of literary criticism, reading should not only combine points and faces, but also combine depth and shallowness.

Have a correct and clear point of view (argument). When we comment on a work of literature, we always have to have a basic opinion: is it good or bad?

Is it basically good and has shortcomings, or is it basically bad but there is something to be desired? This basic view is the central thesis of the article, and this argument must be correct and clear.

It is necessary to use scientific methods of argumentation that conform to logical reasoning. Whether to use induction, deductive, or analogy should be carefully considered. Moreover, whether to write a review of the argument or a review to refute the argument also needs to be determined according to the purpose of the writing, from the actual situation of the work and the needs of the reader.

Literary criticism is also different from general analysis of works. Of course, from a certain point of view, literary criticism should first be based on the analysis of the work, and there is no analysis of how to comment; And the analysis itself naturally contains the evaluation of the work. However, there is still a difference, and the analysis of the work focuses on talking about the work "as it is"; The comments focus on "why it is like this" and "whether it is good or not".

1. Have a correct and clear point of view. When we comment on a literary work, we must always have a basic view: whether it is basically good and has shortcomings, or whether it is basically bad but still has some merits, this basic view is the central thesis of the article, and this argument must be correct and clear.

2. Have accurate, sufficient and convincing arguments. The arguments of literary criticism should mainly be found in the characters, plots, and artistic descriptions of the works, that is, they should conduct a detailed and detailed analysis of the characters, storylines, artistic descriptions, and use of language in the early stages of the work. Thus citing material sufficient to illustrate one's argument as an argument.

3. Have a contemporary consciousness of literary criticism, and be able to write in accordance with the laws and characteristics of literature and the actual situation of the work. It is necessary to use the knowledge of literary theory, literary history, aesthetics, linguistics and rhetoric to conduct specific analyses of specific works. Otherwise, it will be difficult to convince people to make such comments in layman's terms, or to make unrealistic demands on literary and artistic works.

Literary criticism is different from intellectual criticism in general. The object of ideological criticism is social life and the various ideological problems that people manifest in their life and work, with the purpose of helping people improve their ideological understanding and distinguish between right and wrong. It can be argued through a variety of sources, as long as it sticks to the point you are trying to make.

The object of literary criticism is literary works (**, poetry, prose, drama, painting, film and television, etc.); The purpose of the review is to improve the level of reading and appreciation through discussion and evaluation of their ideological content, creative style, artistic characteristics, etc.

Of course, it is possible to cite and cite various materials for argumentation when commenting, but the various materials cited should be related to literary works, and the materials used in literary criticism are basically from the literary works themselves.