The goal and guarantee of judicial impartiality is the goal and guarantee of judicial impartiality

Legal analysis: judicial impartiality refers to the ideal state achieved by various factors in the operation of judicial power, which is an important symbol of political democracy and progress in modern society, and an important guarantee for the economic development and social stability of modern countries.

Judicial fairness includes substantive fairness and procedural fairness, the former is the fundamental goal of judicial fairness, and the latter is an important guarantee of judicial fairness. The relationship between overall justice and individual justice reflects the value orientation and orientation of judicial justice.

Judicial fairness requires that the court's adjudication process adhere to the principle of fairness and equality, and also requires that the court's adjudication results reflect the spirit of fairness and justice. The former can be called procedural justice, and the latter can be called substantive justice. Together, they constitute the basic content of judicial justice.

Legal basis: "Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China" Article 6: People's courts, people's procuratorates, and public security organs must rely on the masses in conducting criminal proceedings, must be based on facts, and must be based on the law. All citizens are equal in the application of the law, and no privileges are allowed before the law.

Legal Analysis: (1) The fundamental institutional guarantee of judicial fairness is judicial independence.

2) Strengthen education on professional ethics for judges, and unswervingly follow the path of elitism for judges.

3) Improve the supervision mechanism.

Legal basis: Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court and the Ministry of Justice on Regulating the Mutual Relationship between Judges and Lawyers and Safeguarding Judicial Fairness

Article 2: Judges shall handle cases strictly in accordance with law, and are not to be interfered with or influenced by parties and their retained lawyers by taking advantage of various relationships or improperly using improper methods to interfere with or exert influence on the trial of a case.

Before and during the course of a case, lawyers must not declare to their clients that they have a relationship with a judge of the court accepting the case, such as relatives, friends, classmates, teachers and students, or former colleagues, and must not use such relationships or use other forms prohibited by law to interfere with or influence the trial of the case.

Article 3: Judges must not privately and unilaterally meet with parties or their retained lawyers.

Lawyers must not unilaterally meet with judges in violation of regulations.

Because in the process of judicial judgment, it is often necessary for forensic doctors to provide very favorable evidence, so it is very necessary for forensic doctors to guess Mu Mu in judicial cases.

Because the forensic doctor is the one who faces the truth most directly, if there is no way to guarantee fairness and justice, then all the truth will be buried.

Because in the process of solving a judicial case, it is usually necessary for the forensic team to provide very favorable evidence, and often some small details are the key to solving the case.