The problem of renting a house. Very urgent, urgent. Hopeful, lawyers. Speed to send me a message.

Hey, which company are they? You are in breach of contract But the agent said not to give you the rest of the rent This is not allowed in the agency If you really don't give it to you, you will go to court with her I can take the head to guarantee that you will definitely win Unless you write in the contract, "Checking out within the specified period is regarded as a breach of contract and paying 200% of the liquidated damages and not returning the remaining rent" If so, then I have no problem, I am the intermediary, you listen to me, he doesn't give you, you will sue her. It's going to win.

It is certainly not possible for both to take effect at the same time. It's a big deal that I leave the house empty, and I can't give him 200% liquidated damages.

Liquidated damages have been agreed, and the rental fee should be surrendered. You can negotiate with the landlord and you find a tenant to continue the lease, and then he will not charge you a penalty and refund the payment. Because the new tenant renews your rent, he is equal to no loss of rent.

The agent helps you rent a house, which is usually a one-time act, that is, you sign a contract with the landlord and they take the commission and leave. If there is a situation of repossession of the house, it may be that he first leases it from the landlord and then subleases, and the agent does not do this kind of business at present, because the risk is high.

You'll want to look at your rental agreement, whether it's a landlord or an agent, so you can determine who you're negotiating with.

Threaten the landlord that you are going to sublet the house.

It depends on the specific content of the contract.

You should have an advantage.

You can e-mail me.

You should talk to the owner in person, maybe he will agree!

Party A breaches the contract, takes back the house, and then compensates Party B according to the amount specified in the contract compensation clause, and then claims compensation from the landlord according to the contract and returns the house.

According to your statement, the other party agrees to return the money, do you agree? If you are not willing to accept the delay in performing the contract, it is also a good idea to terminate the contract.

Estimate that your contract does not explicitly stipulate liability for breach of contract. If the liability for breach of contract is agreed, the other party will not be so calm.

Of course, it cannot be ruled out that the other party deliberately fails to perform the contract and delays until you request to terminate the contract.

I have encountered this situation before, a company orders a batch of goods, and there is no agreement on the liability for breach of contract. The other party didn't do it at all. As a result, it is not possible to assert rights.

If your contract is expressly agreed, it is recommended that you claim your rights according to the agreement, and if there is no agreement, you can only choose to wait and terminate the contract. Of course, you can claim that the other party is liable for the losses caused by the termination of the contract. I won't go into details.

In the future, before you sign a contract, you must carefully consider the terms of the contract, foresee all the risks, and avoid them in a legal way in the contract.

Where conditions permit, a lawyer may be consulted.

1. Because the contract you signed does not stipulate the liability for breach of contract for late delivery, it is not good for you to claim the liability of the other party for breach of contract in this regard.

2. Now you can let the other party refund your money and the bank's loan interest for the same period.

1. The current agreement is only a single agreement on the moving time and the return of the deposit, which is essentially a supplement to the original rental agreement, and its "original rental agreement will be invalidated" is obviously only valid for the check-out time and the deposit, and the matters not involved (such as damage and repair of things, etc.) are not invalidated;

2. The repair cost of the range hood damage should be determined according to the provisions of the original rental contract, and it is not man-made damage, it is used for too long, it is natural wear and tear, and this natural loss is uncertain in time, so it should be dealt with according to the terms of the original rental agreement, not to mention that according to the new agreement, who is responsible for the repair cost, the landlord should not let you bear it;

3. Generally speaking, if you encounter an unreasonable landlord for this repair fee, I suggest that you still negotiate to solve it, the landlord bears 80%, and you symbolically bear 20%, because the competition is now bad when you use it, so give a little moral balance!

1. Even normal wear and tear is due to use, and you have used it for almost a year (you don't have to break it, right).

2. It is a bit difficult for you to repair alone, it is recommended to discuss with the landlord, half of the maintenance fee for one person, after all, the landlord has used it for a long time, and the life of the machine has been reduced a lot, and it is precisely when you use it that there is a problem. It is recommended for one and a half.

3. Even if the landlord does not agree to the maintenance fee of half per person, it will not cost a few dollars, and if you think about how much a new range hood costs, you can't afford to delay you for this money. It's almost the New Year, so it's time to give alms to the landlord.

Now the key question is:

1. You want to get your deposit back.

2. Who repairs the broken machine?

I think you can consider the following:

1. Generally, there is no need to compensate for normal wear and tear, you communicate with the landlord about this, emphasizing that this is normal loss 2, the new contract has no agreement on this, this is beneficial to you, because this is normal natural loss, you can use the original contract as a reference.

3. How much does it cost to repair the machine? If not much, communicate with the landlord to make a part, this should be the fastest solution.

Let's play the friendship card!!

Talk to the landlord about the reason, and the lease has not expired, and he asked us to move out, don't we have to ask for liquidated damages?

As far as the contract is concerned, whether it is new or old, you will suffer a great loss, although there is no home appliance maintenance clause on the new contract to rip off, but the landlord has your deposit, you are still very passive (this kind of trivial matter is not possible to sue so troublesome, or rely on communication), if it is not good, take a step back and half of the maintenance fee, talk about it, and strive to minimize the loss.

In the future, it is good to find a formal intermediary rental contract on the rental online to use, and the rights and obligations of both parties are still very clear, and when you enter into a private contract with others, you must pay attention to protecting your rights!!

Although I sympathize with the renter being evicted halfway, but from the facts, the old agreement must be repaired, right, the new agreement is based on the old agreement to return the deposit, and it is mainly for the negotiation of the deposit, and the warranty content has not been modified, right, so it still needs to be repaired.

Besides, such a landlord is not a good person to drive people halfway, no matter whether you just want to move or not, in short, such a person has long been away from the early thing, two hundred yuan don't miss other good times, let alone a bad mood for this matter, Lao Tzu has the ability to earn it back in one day, and buy a house by himself in the future, right.

Hello: You should not repair, if you continue to live in this house, you repair it for the sake of continued use, provided that it can be repaired. Otherwise, for fixed assets are necessary equipment for renting, the landlord will be responsible for any period of time during your rental period.

You have to be upright, the department is weak, and you can be slaughtered!

Personal understanding: your agreement is lost, the landlord has, so whether the new agreement takes effect depends on whether the landlord is willing to show the new agreement, so there are two situations: 1

If the landlord does not show the new agreement, then, according to the old agreement, the lease period has not expired, and the tenant is evicted, the landlord needs to be responsible and needs to compensate you for your losses, as far as I know, at least one month, but it still depends on whether the contract you signed is specified, 2If the landlord presents the new agreement, the old contract will be invalid and the new agreement shall prevail.

The specific matters still depend on the content of your agreement.

I feel that you may be a student, social experience is not rich, the contract has not expired, the landlord wants you to move out, you were going to claim from him, give you a month of rent compensation, and then return your deposit, you can move away, but you don't know to claim your rights, and he signed a moving contract, and then lost, the contract is lost is your fault, ** will because you lost the contract, you can invalidate the contract, the landlord's contract has your signature, it still takes effect, and then you damage the item, You agreed to use those facilities at the time, and now the damage is repaired to him, and the landlord did not say that he wants you to compensate for the original price, according to the folk convention, the use of the facilities in the rental house can be depreciated, but not damaged. According to the contract, you are also responsible for restoring it to a usable level. It's not hard for you.

In my opinion, it is better for you to be cautious, because there are so many doubts here: who can prove that he said that the rent will be paid until the end of August? What's more, the rental contract he provided did not have the landlord's signature; Even if the landlord comes back, will he agree to sublet?

There is no way to guarantee that your interests will not be compromised! You can't be fooled because the house is not easy to find, you must know that if you give him the money, the real landlord will not know what is going on, won't you lose more, the current ID card and so on can be faked, and if in order to prove that what he said is true, let you confirm it to the landlord, do you dare to guarantee that he will not let his accomplice play the fake landlord? Think twice.

Low-rent housing refers to the provision of social security housing in the form of rent subsidies or rent in kind to families who meet the minimum living security standards for urban residents and have housing difficulties. The distribution of low-rent housing is mainly in the form of rent subsidies, supplemented by rent allocation in kind and rent reduction and reduction. According to the provisions of the Notice on the Parallel Operation of Public Rental Housing and Low-rent Housing (Jian Bao 2013 No. 178) jointly issued by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, the Ministry of Finance and the National Development and Reform Commission, from 2014 onwards, public rental housing and low-rent housing in various regions will be operated in parallel, and they will be collectively referred to as public rental housing after the merger.

Eligibility. 1. The applicant has a permanent residence in the local city for more than 5 years;

2. The applicant must be a low-income family or the lowest-income family recognized by the local civil affairs department;

3. The per capita housing construction area of the applicant's family is less than 15 square meters and the total construction area of the family housing is less than 50 square meters;

4. The applicant family members have a legal relationship of support, support or upbringing, and live together;

5. The applicant and his/her family members have been confirmed by the local housing management department that there is no housing elsewhere.

There is no way to do this, at most you can only lose the deposit.

If you don't rent it, you lose the deposit for renting a house.

1. Do you see if there is any relevant agreement on the termination of the contract in your rental contract?

2. You can negotiate with the landlord, talk about your current problem, ask the landlord to terminate the contract with you, and you can make up for the landlord's losses appropriately, which is faster;

3. If the landlord does not cooperate, for the health of the children and your family, go to another place to rent a house, move in first, and then slowly solve the problem of renting with the landlord;

4. Based on the landlord's non-cooperation, you can sue the court to terminate the contract on the grounds that the formaldehyde exceeds the standard of the house (it is best to preliminarily confirm it), and the court will appoint an appraisal structure for appraisal, and the party at fault will bear the loss.

Hello! If your landlord is a reasonable person, he will let you move out, the key is to have a baby, and you can't let the child suffer! But since you are in breach of contract, you will break the bank!

Generally, you will be deducted from half a month to a month's rent. The deposit is refundable. You can just tell the landlord and be reasonable, unless you run into that kind of nonsense.

Find your local newspaper and newspaper, I think they are the only ones who can solve your problem.

Try to negotiate as much as possible! If the negotiation fails, then sue in court! I wonder if the landlord told you that the house was newly renovated when you moved in?

Tell the landlord that if it doesn't work, you can find **, and you can also send microwaves.

Invite** Ya The speech of the masses is the best!

There is no other way but to the courthouse. However, with such a little money, I didn't change my smile and accept anything.

[Only answer Shaanxi Province**.] Provinces**, do not harass!!

1. Landlord infringement.

First of all, you have signed the agreement and paid the corresponding rent, which legally constitutes a de facto tenancy relationship. As for the deposit, it is just a compensation in case something else happens.

Secondly, moving your things without your permission is wrong in the first place, and it may constitute a tort here (depending on whether it is serious). Because, your property, is protected by law. No one may process it without your knowledge or knowledge.

The landlord should notify you in a timely manner.

2. If you want to continue your residence, then you can request to continue living.

3. If you don't want to live, the landlord should give you a full refund of the rent. Since you didn't say "whether there is a breach of contract clause" here, I can't tell you whether you can claim liquidated damages.

4. Check your property and report to the police if there is any loss. Give evidence of your actual loss. Ask the landlord for compensation.

According to your description, when you viewed the property, "you didn't have much cash on you, so you only paid the rent and didn't pay the deposit", and "signed something like an agreement with the landlord," which can be considered as the lease contract of the house has come into effect. However, if you fail to fulfill the "deposit before the 10th" in the agreement, it is a breach of contract. However, if the landlord "sublets the house to someone else" without contacting you, the landlord is in breach of the obligation to inform and violates the rights of you and the excepted renter.