In Reflections on the Mountain , what provokes the writer to think

The article is "Thinking Like a Mountain", so what triggers this kind of thinking? That is, the origin and cause of this kind of thinking.

Clearly: it was because of the hunting of wolves, because of that "deep, proud howl".

There is no difference, the thinking of man and the thinking of the mountain are both thoughts about man and nature.

The "thinking of the mountain" in the text is an objective thinking about the natural ecology and a kind of thinking about living in harmony with nature. The author wants to tell us that man is not the master of nature, and that the relationship between man and nature is no different from the relationship between a mountain and all things in nature, and that man is an integral part of the ecological chain of nature.

Thinking Like a Mountain is an essay by Aldo Leopold, an American writer and the "father of modern environmental protection", revealing the huge natural destruction and existential crisis hidden behind all kinds of short-sighted behaviors under human stupidity, which is thought-provoking.

First, the meaning of the expression is different.

1. Human thinking: It is the author's good suggestion on the way to deal with the relationship between man and nature, and it is the expression of the poem of this suggestion.

2. Thinking about mountains: It is an objective thinking about natural ecology and a kind of thinking about living in harmony with nature.

Second, the author tells that the results are different.

1. Human thinking: Man is not the master of nature, and from the perspective of ecological environmental protection and ecological ethics, we are no more intelligent than a mountain.

2. Thinking about mountains: Man is not the master of nature, the relationship between man and nature is no different from the relationship between a mountain and all things in nature, human beings are an integral part of the ecological chain of nature, and only by "thinking like a mountain" can we achieve a higher state of harmony with nature.

The "thinking of mountains" in this article is an objective thinking about natural ecology. It is a kind of thinking in harmony with nature.

The author wants to tell us that man is not the master of nature, and that the relationship between man and nature is no different from the relationship between a mountain and all things in nature, and that man is an integral part of the ecological chain of nature.

Answer: Shan's thinking is actually the author's thinking, that is, human beings have fundamentally destroyed the environment for short-term interests, become enemies of nature, and eventually, human beings will fall into the dangerous situation of destroying themselves with civilization.

In fact, the destruction of nature by human beings has spread to all corners, from the forest to the sea to the sky, the scope is shocking, the forest has been cut down in large numbers, the vegetation has been seriously damaged, the rivers and lakes have been seriously polluted, wild animals are being hunted, many fish are also dying, birds are decreasing, all the destruction of nature, and finally led to the punishment of nature.

It is good for people to pursue material construction, but they must respect nature and must not sacrifice nature at the expense of destroying the ecological environment.

The "thinking of mountains" in this article is an objective thinking about natural ecology. It is a kind of thinking in harmony with nature.

The author wants to tell us that man is not the master of nature, and that the relationship between man and nature is no different from the relationship between a mountain and all things in nature, and that man is an integral part of the ecological chain of nature.

If we think about it from the position of modern environment and society, it is harmony, tranquility. Wise, broad

Is it necessary to deliberately make it so complicated?

The author who thinks like a mountain is Aldo Leopold.

Thinking Like a Mountain" is an American writer"The father of modern environmental protection"Aldo Leopold's essay reveals the enormous natural destruction and existential crisis hidden behind the short-sighted behavior of human stupidity.

The development of the industrial revolution has promoted the development of agriculture and brought great abundance of material life to people, but people have ignored a problem, that is, the environment in which we live as human beings, the excessive material pursuit, the continuous demand from nature, and the wrong ecological concept, so that our earth has become devastated. The sudden decline of forest vegetation, serious soil erosion, pollution of industrial wastes, and indiscriminate fishing and killing have seriously damaged the ecological balance, and the earth is facing the danger of being wasteland.

About the Author:

Aldo Leopold (January 11, 1887–April 21, 1948), a scientist and environmentalist of international repute in the United States, is known as America's new conservation campaign"Prophet""Founder of the New Environmental Theory in the United States""The father of eco-ethics" 。He was also an observer, a keen thinker, and a great literary master. He published three books and about 500 articles during his lifetime, mostly on topics related to science and technology.

The Sand Township Yearbook is a collection of the author's natural essays and philosophies, and it is also the pioneering work of land ethics. Aldo Leopoche argues that man's moral concept develops according to three levels, and the earliest moral concept is to deal with the relationship between people and between people and society. These two levels of morality are designed to reconcile the competition between the tribes in order to achieve the goal of symbiotic coexistence.

However, with the understanding of the living environment of human beings, a third level has gradually emerged: the relationship between man and the land. For a long time, however, the relationship between man and land was based on economy, and it was customary and traditional to regard land as the property of man, and to maintain only a privilege without any obligation.

The thinking of mountains is an objective thinking about natural ecology and a kind of thinking about living in harmony with nature. Human thinking, on the other hand, does not involve the aspect of harmonious coexistence.