Who is stronger in the comprehensive performance comparison of the new Tang DM and Roewe eRX5?

<> subject's choice is still relatively correct, now the hybrid technology is very mature, and the new energy has the advantage of unlimited numbers, why not. From the perspective of comprehensive performance, I prefer Nuvoton DM for the following three reasons:

First, the power aspect.

The advantages of Tang DM are quite large, the new third-generation DM technology, the engine equipped with Tang DM, with the blessing of fuel engine + front and rear dual motors and three engines, the maximum power of Tang DM is 441KW, the maximum horsepower is nearly 600 horsepower, the maximum torque, and the acceleration of 100 kilometers only needs to be the creation version. This power is equivalent to that of a conventional naturally aspirated engine.

The Roewe ERX5 is an engine and a single-motor power system, with a maximum system power of 225kW, a maximum horsepower of 306 horsepower, and a maximum torque of only 100 kilometers.

2. Hybrid technology.

BYD's third-generation DM technology has several highlights:

The first is the new BSG motor architecture, which can be directly generated by the engine with the BSG, and the front drive motor and the front axle are still connected, which can be driven at any time, and the overall noise control is better.

The second is the new rear axle drive motor to bring stronger performance, a powerful rear axle drive motor, a gasoline engine and two motors and three engines at the same time, which can provide a maximum of nearly 600 horsepower and 950 Nm, and the maximum horsepower of the Lamborghini Maverick Huracan is only 610 horsepower and 560 Nm.

The third is more intelligent electronic control management optimization, more economical and energy-saving, using the economic range of the engine to generate electricity, in the case of urban congestion, can effectively balance the amount of electricity, reduce the occurrence of power feeding.

Fourth, the ride is improved, which is also due to the new BSG motor, when the hybrid intervenes, the BSG can directly pull the engine to the appropriate speed and then access, and there is no frustration at all.

The Roewe ERX5, which was launched in November 2016, is technically behind the Tang DM, with a pure electric range of 60 km, compared to 80 km for the Tang DM (100 km for the Genesis version). In addition, BYD Tang can also realize the function of reverse discharge, which is equivalent to a mobile power supply for travel, if a family travels by car, they can also have a hearty picnic, so that life is not only convenient but also full of fun.

Third, the driving mode.

Tang DM uses full-time electric four-wheel drive, which has a faster response time, 10 times that of the traditional four-wheel drive system, and only takes 20 milliseconds. For example: abacus and computer, abacus is mechanical, computer is electronic, computer is much faster than abacus calculation, that is to say, electronic will react faster than mechanical.

Faster response times mean greater safety, and lives often mean the difference between the fractions. Moreover, Tang DM also has ATS multi-terrain options, which can easily cope with various driving conditions. The Roewe ERX5 is a front-wheel drive model, and its safety, stability, extrication, and off-road ability are not as good as Tang DM.

Therefore, my personal opinion is that these two models choose Tang DM, whether it is power, safety or technology, Tang DM has obvious advantages, and it is also a 7-seat mid-size SUV, and the space is also larger.

Hello, recommend BYD Tang DM

Roewe should be more reliable, after all, a clear warranty scope is given for the attenuation of the battery pack capacity, and GAC New Energy has made the same commitment, like GS4 PHEV, after testing, its power battery non-fault capacity attenuation as long as it is less than 80%, it can be replaced free of charge.

The Roewe ERX5 is two years smaller than the Tang night market, and the exterior design is a little more modern, while the BYD Tang has a slight sense of age today.

In terms of interior design, the size of the central control screen of the two is about the same, but the overall design sense of Roewe ERX5 is indeed closer to the taste of young people, and the overall interior of BYD Tang is relatively thick.

In terms of parameters, BYD's three-engine four-wheel drive is indeed very subversive SUV, but the three-engine drive of Roewe ERX5, 60km pure electric battery life and 3H charging, more than enough to meet the needs of urban commuting.

The super power praised by BYD Tang before: there is actually a potential safety hazard in the acceleration time of 100 kilometers - there is a feeling of rushing out with a light click of the accelerator, and it is difficult to grasp when you are stuck in traffic and following the car during the rush hour, and it is more tiring to drive, and it is very scary. The Roewe ERX5 accelerates to 100 meters, and for safety reasons, the power of the Roewe ERX5 is more reasonable.

In addition, the Roewe ERX5's battery is designed in strict accordance with the UL2580 standard, and the promise of a 30% failure rate also improves its own cost performance.

My brother Hu You also recommended me Roewe ERX5 before, and I hadn't seen the new generation of Song DM at that time, so I went to the Roewe 4S store first.

At that time, I felt that the interior of the Roewe ERX5 was rough, and many places were made of hard plastic, but I mainly looked at the performance, but after the test drive, the Roewe ERX5 started a little meaty, and the response of the power was not very timely, and the gap between the Song DM that I later tested was still quite large, after all, the acceleration time of 100 kilometers per second has always been the highlight of the new generation of Song DM, and there is this logo on the body, and Roewe is a lot worse. From the perspective of the new energy vehicle itself, the pure electric range of the Roewe 60 is also a lot less than that of the Song, and the comprehensive range of oil and electricity is also 150km less, and the fuel consumption of 100 kilometers is reached. It can be said that ** Song DM has obvious advantages in such a comparison.

Those who have been paying attention to BYD know that his family's warranty is longer than that of cars of the same level, **Song DM is no exception, the vehicle warranty is 6 years 15W km, and the battery cell is guaranteed for life, while Roewe only has 5 years 10W, and the warranty period of the battery pack of the core components is also less than that of Song DM.

<> especially when I saw a new generation of Song DM and electric tailgate and mobile power station, I feel that these configurations are quite practical, and they will be used when they go out, and they are about 30,000 lower than Roewe ERX5.

Tang's sales are obvious to all, after the Song hybrid came out, it directly led to Tang's sales halved, and by the way, it snatched away a batch of production capacity that was supposed to buy Qin 100 BYD, and there has been no problem, the only suspense is to see that next year's statistical sales are several times that of the second place. Cannibalism can be said to be without blinking Song DM and Song EV300 are new models that BYD only launched in April this year, BYD launched Song's traditional fuel version in October 2015, and also launched Song's version of the model in September 2016. However, Song's sales seem to be the same as Tang's, driving high and going low, and now the sales of the three versions of the model are combined, and the sales are not as large as when the previous Song version of the model was sold.

In the final analysis, it has to be said that with the reduction of state subsidies, there are fewer and fewer consumers who are willing to pay 150,000-200,000 yuan to buy BYD's new energy vehicles.

On the one hand, it is because of the bad reputation left by Tang before, BYD's plug-in hybrid technology is not mature, and when you use it, you feel that oil is oil and electricity is electricity, and they do not cooperate well with each other. Moreover, many car owners reported that when there was no electricity, BYD's models exposed the problems of the fuel version of the car, with high engine noise and high fuel consumption. When driving with electricity, it was quite quiet, but the abnormal noise of the body was unbearable.

In fact, although the body size of the BYD Song is a little smaller than that of the Tang, in fact, the Song DM is the skin change product of the Tang, and many of the problems that have not been solved on the Tang body are still prepared or exist in the Song DM car. And for Song EV300, a pure electric SUV, it is actually very embarrassing, saying that the cruising range is 300 kilometers, but it is not the case in practice, BYD's power battery durability is not very good, it will be attenuated to below 70% in half a year, and it will be close to scrapping after 500 charges. Reducing power consumption per 100 kilometers and reducing fuel consumption of traditional cars is almost the same, all of which require the technical cooperation of various components of the vehicle, not a single part to do a good job, and now many independent brands have high fuel consumption because of the lack of powertrain, the core technology of vehicle lightweight, and the same is true in the field of new energy.

100 kilometers of power consumption is now also one of the important criteria for the national assessment of new energy vehicles, BYD does not develop on the three electric technology, but blindly increase the number of batteries, this ingenious approach will inevitably be eliminated by the market.

Tang is positioned as a medium-sized SUV, Song is positioned as a compact Huai state SUV, Tang is, Song is, the official acceleration of 100 kilometers is the same, if you want better comfort and not bad money, choose Tang. If you want to disturb the fuel consumption for long distances and low lead sources, choose Song. There are advantages and disadvantages, just consider yourself.