The old man tripped over a dog leash and died, the woman walking the dog turned around indifferently

This is not a rope, but a chain, an iron chain, the chain that ties the dog, or "dog chain" for short, and must not be called a "dog leash", so as not to mislead the reader and make them wonder how a rope can be so powerful that it can easily knock people down? When it is known that this is a very thick chain, it is not difficult to understand. Therefore, it is better to nickname it "dog leash".

The woman's actions are very immoral and disgusting, and should be punished by law.

No, the woman walking the dog can only say that she is afraid of being responsible, she does not dare to take responsibility, and she is afraid that the old man will lie to herself, so she will run away.

Let's coordinate the reparations. It's an accident. But the girl's attitude afterwards. A little bit of that... Never mind. As for what the girl thought at that time, only she knew. One word.. She's still a child.

A teenager is just a teenager, and the first reaction in the face of emergencies must be Meng, this is a normal reaction!

A 12-year-old girl probably didn't dare to face it, so she chose to turn around and run away, hoping that she could grow up in the future.

The old man is gone. A twelve-year-old girl's heart can't be let die again.

When drunk, people's family members don't pursue a group of people to condemn here, why don't everyone condemn this dog and chase other dogs?

It's only 12, what do you ask her to do? She was scared.

Maybe it's because this woman is relatively young, and she doesn't know how to deal with this kind of thing, so she is very scared.

1. Responsibilities to be borne by dog owners:

Article 79 of the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that if the animal violates the management regulations and fails to take safety measures for the animal and causes damage to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear the tort liability.

Article 83 stipulates that if an animal causes damage to others due to the fault of a third party, the infringed party may claim compensation from the animal keeper or manager, or may also claim compensation from the third party. After the animal keeper or manager makes compensation, he or she has the right to recover compensation from a third party.

Judging from the information available, the girl is sure that she is not the owner of the dog, nor is she the manager (referring to the situation of dog fostering, as the manager of the dog), but to play with the dog, then she is the third person mentioned in Article 83 of the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China.

The girl led the dog out to play and did not hold the dog, causing the dog to run and causing the old man to fall to the ground and die, which is the fault of a third party as mentioned in article 83.

According to the law of our country, as a dog owner, regardless of whether it is at fault or not, you must bear the corresponding responsibility, but in the end, whether it is the actual bearer, according to Article 83, the family of the elderly can ask the dog owner for compensation, and can also ask the girl's guardian to compensate.

It should also be noted that the dog owner leashed the dog in front of a big tree in front of the house, which made it easier for the girl to take the dog away, and the dog owner did not fulfill the management and control obligations. If the owner of the dog keeps the dog on a leash at home, and the girl takes the dog away from the owner's house without the consent of the owner, the nature is completely different.

2. The girl's guardian shall be held responsible:

Article 32: Guardian responsibility, where a person who lacks or has limited capacity for civil conduct causes harm to others, the guardian bears tort liability. Where guardians fulfill their guardianship responsibilities, their tort liability may be reduced. Where a person with property who lacks or has limited capacity for civil conduct causes harm to others, compensation is to be paid from his or her own property.

The guardian shall compensate for the shortfall.

As previously analyzed, according to Article 83 of the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China, the girl is at fault of a third party and must be held responsible, but according to the official report, the girl who took the dog out this time is only 12 years old and has no civil capacity, and according to the law, the girl's guardian bears the corresponding responsibility.

In the end, it was determined that the incident was an accident, that is, no one will be criminally dealt with, but the civil liability depends on the attitude of the victim's family.

In the end, the old man's family did not let the little girl compensate. The little girl's family was poor and the family had no money, so the old man's family did not let the little girl lose money. Moreover, the father has been an old man for more than ten years and lacks education for his children, and the children are relatively pitiful, in a forgiving place, and the psychology of forgiveness is not investigated.

The official report said that the incident was preliminarily judged to be an accident, and the relevant aftermath work is currently underway.

The main responsibility for the dog walker is that she not only steals the dog, but also harms others; Dog owners take a small part of the blame for not taking good care of their dogs.

The dog owner is primarily responsible because the care is not good. Women are minors and need a guardian to be responsible.

Since the dog walker died because the dog walked the old man and died, the dog walker needs to pay a certain amount of responsibility. The owner of the dog is also responsible for a certain amount of responsibility, after all, it is the death caused by the dog to the elderly.

The girl walking the dog is primarily responsible, and the dog owner is secondarily responsible. The girl walking the dog was not well supervised during the dog walk, and the consequences caused by it need to compensate the elderly.

Yes, the girl didn't hold the rope properly, and the rope came out of her hands, causing the dog to run around and have an accident.

Not a dog owner. The little girl took advantage of the dog's owner's inattention and stole the dog out to play, but unexpectedly tripped the old man.

The girl who led the dog was not the owner of the dog, she was leading other people's dogs out to play, and she didn't take a good look at the dog, which would cause the old man to trip over the dog leash and die.

No, the owner of the dog is someone else, but the little girl took the dog away without the consent of the dog owner.

In fact, all this has something to do with his home education, although he is 12 years old and is about to enter junior high school, he is still a primary school student, and he may not have a lot of experience in these things. Therefore, in the final analysis, as long as civil compensation is made, it is still excusable.

I think the blame for all this lies with her, it was she who secretly walked the dog and did not lead the dog properly, which led to the death of the innocent old man.

Although the law did not provide for the girl to be held criminally responsible, it was necessary for her to apologize to the family of the elderly.

I think this kind of behavior of girls is really bad. And I also feel that the girl's parents are not disciplining their children well.