When was the last time the Earth entered the photon belt?

Updated on science 2024-02-09
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    b3253415 Are you talking nonsense?

    I'm going to tell you, it's true that the Earth went into the photon belt, and it's true that humans went from three to four dimensions, but in the process of going from three to four, humans will go from three to zero, and a lot of people will die in the process. As long as there are humans who live from zero to four dimensions, they will evolve from zero to four dimensions, and when they get to four dimensions, they won't be what they are now. Evolution, that is, the photon belt splits and reorganizes human cells Humans will go to a strange space in the fourth degree, and in the process, some humans will be shaken, and some evolutionary errors or death will be caused (and I forgot to mention that when humans go back to zero, they will go to a very cool down to zero, and a lot of people will die at this time).

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    I dreamed that I became a Namek, I am very smart and very kind, is this also a kind of foreknowledge? Maybe I believe I was a Namek in my last life.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    We're living in four dimensions now, big brother. The four-dimensional space is the three-dimensional plus timeline. Dimension 3 is a space at rest.

    Photon belts, not hadron belts. It doesn't have that much energy to generate a hundred million spaces, and you put a hundred hearts. Besides, who told you that the Earth is going to pass through the photon belt.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Kids and cartoons you've watched too much, right?

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    In addition to star clusters and black holes in the Milky Way, there is also a very peculiar thing called the photon belt, which is rich in high-energy photons and has a very strong seismic force, which was first discovered by our scientists around 1961.

    The photon belt is a donut shape, its center overlaps with the center of the sun's orbit, and its radius is the same as the radius of the sun's revolution, but its plane is perpendicular to the sun's orbital plane, which means that the solar system will encounter a photon belt every half revolution, and it will take 12,000 years to pass through the entire photon belt. The last time we left the photon belt was.

    Lakh. The Atlantean dynasty of years ago is now over.

    Lakh. years, which means that we are going to enter the photon belt again.

  6. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    It is impossible for the Earth to enter the photonic belt because the photonic belt does not exist at all.

    Photons are particles of light and are a state of being in the propagation of light. Whereas, the photonic band is the band of light that is formed when light travels, it is an energy state. As a state of energy without energy, there has been no "real" discovery so far.

    Since it is a state of energy wave transmission, it is different from physical particles and cannot constitute any "independent" photon band. After the light is emitted from the light source in all directions, it will never stop moving at the speed of light until it encounters the interaction of other physical particles, such as absorbing reflux. It is unlikely that they bend in a local cosmic region to form some photon bands.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The definition of the photonic belt is not correct, the correct definition should be called the electron belt, this needs to be demonstrated by the "Theory of Everything", we are no strangers to electrons in microscopic physics, and there are many contradictions in microscopic physics and macroscopic physics with the current physical definition of argumentation, but under the "Theory of All", all things are of the same origin, and all forces can also be the same. Newton's classical mechanics defines electrons in microscopic atoms as if they are planets orbiting the sun, which is extremely incorrect, under the "Theory of Everything", electrons are due to the pull of the surrounding negative space (it can also be said to be the pull of gravitational force or weak nuclear force) or because of the tendency of positive space to attract the trend of positive space (positive and negative space tends to be the form of space generated by 0 space as the midpoint, and the positive space tends to be the visible volume, and the space that tends to negative space exists outside the universe, invisible volume but perceptible mass or gravitational pull) (expansion - dark energy also exists in the universe), but the expansion is controlled by gravity and is re-compressed, resulting in the random production of particles with antimatter properties - electrons.

    The only difference between the microscopic electron and the macroscopic electron band is their temporality, the generation and extinction of the microscopic electron are random, but the electron band is relatively stable. Now scientists have discovered its existence, but now physical theories have not been able to explain its cause, and it is mistaken for a photon belt, and the principle of photon and electron generation is the same, both are particles of antimatter properties generated by the recompression of the released space, but in a different way.

    In our universe, there are many such spaces that are pulled by the surrounding gravitational field and the positive space tends to dominate, and it is normal to generate electron bands, just as there are electrons in atoms, and some electrons also randomly appear in the interior of the atoms.

    The Sun is surrounded by a large area of mass space (dark matter) that protects and repels the so-called photon belts, which are the emptiest margins of cosmic space (microgravitational zones).

    I can't prove whether the earth can enter that photon belt (so to speak, whether the solar system can collide with the photon belt) because I am not an astronomical expert, and in the microscopic world, particles of this antimatter nature often collide with positive particles, which is also the main source of visible energy.

    But in the macrocosm, this phenomenon is much less likely.

    The properties of electrons and photons have a lot in common, and if we enter the highly dense electron band, it may give humans a better opportunity for energy and DNA evolution, but one thing is for sure, entering the electron band, our time, movement, space, and perception will have a great and fundamental change. We may make it to another world alive. Actually, it's not much different from dying and entering that world, if you believe in God, it's actually the game of life.

    No big deal.

    Then again, it's all speculation, and we don't have to believe it that way then. Our material life can only grasp the last 1 second of the cycle we feel now. (We can't go back to the past, and we can't take a step in the future.) )

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Photon belts: In addition to star clusters and black holes, there is also a very peculiar thing in the Milky Way, called the photon belt, which is rich in high-energy photons and has a very strong seismic force, which was first discovered by our scientists around 1961. The photon belt is doughnut-shaped, its center overlaps the center of the sun's orbit, the radius is the same as the sun's orbital radius, but its plane is perpendicular to the sun's orbital plane, that is to say, the solar system will encounter a photon belt every half revolution, and it will take 2,000 years to pass through the entire photon belt.

    The last time we left the photon belt was the Atlantean dynasty 100,000 years ago, and now 100,000 years have passed, which means that we are entering the photon belt again.

    The photon belt contains dense and high-seismic photons, once it enters it, the entire solar system will undergo drastic changes, the electromagnetic field of the earth will be completely changed, and the photons will become our main energy source, making interstellar travel very common, but the focus is on the change of human beings. Photons will change the structure of the human body, our vibration force will be increased instantly, the body will become more transparent and lighter, the consciousness level will also be increased, many illusions in life will disappear, we will have incredible abilities, those abilities that God has given us a long time ago, you can also say that we live in heaven, a planet with high vibration power.

    2012 was deliberately fabricated by some people with ulterior motives.

    I don't dare to judge anything else, but in astronomy, where I know a little bit, the arguments for the 2012 apocalypse are always so ridiculous, just to name a few.

    Planet Nibriu.

    The photon belt is a line between the Sun, the Earth, and the center of the Milky Way.

    Solar storms. I am a shallow talent, and there are some imprecision in my answers. But what is the credibility of the so-called apocalypse, where the arguments in astronomy can be found so many questions by an astronomy enthusiast? The same is true of other arguments.

    The people who made up the end of the century in 2012 are people who don't understand astronomy, and if I were willing to do these things, I would be much more rigorous in science than I am now, but my sense of social responsibility will not allow me to do so.

    The landlord found that all the arguments in 2012 have a commonality? It's hard to verify.

    The argument cited is that it is a civilization that has long disappeared and is far away on the other side of the ocean, which is difficult to verify.

    Speaking of celestial bodies, the time that can be observed has been pushed back again and again (for example, the time that can be observed has been pushed from 2009 to 2011), which is difficult to verify. And the latitude and longitude are never given, and it is difficult to verify.

    In 2012, all the arguments landlords may wish to take a look, how many of them can be verified? Why can't I get it? It's simple, because it doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

    The 2012 Apocalypse Theory is now again touting that in 2012 there will be seven planets in a straight line. After reading it, there is helplessness in addition to laughter. The arguments found by apocalyptic theorists in 2012 are really getting more and more ridiculous.

    However, such a clumsy theory is still believed by some people, which is really thought-provoking.

    2012, a farce, it's time to end.

Related questions
7 answers2024-02-09

3 times absolutely not. Because the hair around the mouth is relatively fine and the hair follicles are relatively small, it is not easy to be irradiated by photons, and the effect is much better in about 12 times. >>>More

11 answers2024-02-09

Equatorial length: 40,076 km Meridian length: 40,009 km Polar radius length: >>>More

6 answers2024-02-09

Song Title: The Earth Is Weeping.

Singer: Liu Genghong. >>>More

15 answers2024-02-09

Don't simply look at things as they look!

The relatively stable relationship between the earth and the sun is the balance of the gravitational pull of the sun on the earth and the centrifugal force of the earth's revolution. >>>More

3 answers2024-02-09

When was the primordial earth born? According to the widely circulated scientific opinion, the primordial Earth was born about 50 million years after the formation of the solar system. But a new view put forward by Jacobson, a scholar at Harvard University in the United States, is that the primitive earth was formed much earlier than that. >>>More