What does the vertical wing of the Su 27 actually do???

That is the rudder (tail rudder), used to control the direction of flight, B2 This kind of aircraft without tail rudder relies on the flaps on the wings, speed brakes to change the resistance on both sides to steer, not at all to maintain flight stability crash B2 is because the moisture in the speed sensor is not blown out, resulting in the speed reading error, causing the automatic flight control system to control the aircraft to do a large angle climb at a very low speed to cause the wing stall, resulting in the plane crash.

The vertical tail is used to maintain flight stability. I remember that when B2 fell last year, some experts said that because there was no vertical tail, the flight was unstable, and it was easy to fall as soon as there was a small failure.

First of all, this is my personal opinion, and if it's not right, don't spray me. I used to call Sukhoi's plane, and the rudder upstairs was right, but it could be smaller. Personally, I think there are other aspects.

Su-27 heavy jet (anyway, I call it a jet, you casual, jet fighter or something) nicknamed Flanker, I don't think it's interesting, but there is also a nickname called the air scalpel, in '87 the Su-27 hit the Norwegian reconnaissance plane, the Norwegian plane's propeller was cut to the vertical tail of the Su-27, and the Norwegian reconnaissance plane was damaged. You think about how sturdy. There is also an aerodynamic layout, which also requires a vertical tail to coordinate.

Electronic jamming device, visible part of which is the outer fairing.

It's an electronic jamming device!

The Su-27 and various modifications with names starting with the Su-27 do not have canard wings.

The Su-30MKI of India has canard wings.

The Russian Su-34, Su-35, Su-37 have canard wings.

Various Su-27 series in China do not have canard wings.

The Chinese Su-30 does not have canard wings.

In fact, the owner said that the Su, as well as the unmentioned Su, all belong to the Su-27 series, but the Su-27 as the prototype, according to the needs of different tasks to develop the improved type, and its different model numbers only Su-30 obtained the first and the military officially gave the number, the rest are all issued by the Sukhoi Design Bureau in order to show its advanced needs in the export market, and are not recognized by the first and the military, therefore, in Russia (the former Soviet Union) or use its original internal model number.

For example, the prototype number of the Su-30 is Su-27PU;

The prototype number of the Su-33 is Su-27K (K is the special number for carrier-based aircraft, and there are also such as MiG-29K), and the prototype number of the Su-34 is Su-27IB;

The prototype of the Su-34 training aircraft was designated as the Su-27KU;

The prototype of the Su-35 was designated Su-27M.

It can be seen from this that in fact they are all different modifications of the same series of fighters.

In addition, the Su-27 series is equipped with coupled canard wings of the Su-33 (carrier-based fighter), Su-32 (Su-34 naval shore-based attack aircraft), Su-35.

This is a misconception.

Only one Su-37 was produced, numbered 711, and later crashed.

That's why it is said that 711 (numbered) is a substitute for dust oak table Su-37

The Su-37 built only one prototype, the 711 machine, which should be the factory number.

The numbering rules of the former Soviet Union and Russia, the fighter attack aircraft is used in singular numbers, and the sail bombers are used in even numbers, and the front is the abbreviation of the research institute that designed the aircraft.

The SU is the Sukhoi Design Bureau, and the MIG is the Michaeljan-Grevich Design Bureau.

No, because it is not equipped with a downward thrust vectoring nozzle.

VTOL fighters include the British Harrier and Sea Harrier, the Russian Yak-38 and the American F 35

The F 22 cannot take off and land vertically, it is the Air Force type, and the F 35 of the Navy type has the ability to take off and land vertically.

The SU27 cannot take off and land vertically.

Vertical take-off and landing fighters include the British Harrier and Sea Harrier.

In addition, I heard that the F22 can also take off and land vertically.

Today I also watched the live broadcast of Jingshi, the flight stunt show done by the Su-27 Warriors, and tomorrow I can see Viktor Pugachev's Cobra maneuver performance, and the Su-30. I didn't know anything about this, so I forgot to explain the knowledge about the scene. Hey.

No, because it is an Al-31F turbofan engine, not vector-propelled.

The Su-33 is a carrier-based modified version of the Su-27, with the same original wingspan, and the serial manufacturing number should also be the same.

The canard wings of the Su-33 are only for the purpose of lifting, and after taking off and retracting the landing gear, they will be locked, and they will not participate in any flight maneuvers, and together with other ship equipment, they will increase their weight by 2 and a half tons, and naturally become the worst aircraft in the Flanker family.

In addition, the canard wing has nothing to do with maneuverability per se, but is only a performance patch for aircraft with specific needs and undesirable original layouts, and is almost exclusively found in medium and light aircraft and bombers. For example, the J-10 Liangfeng JAS-39 JA-37 is a body that, in fact, has no other reason to be a duck, It's all because the aerodynamic design is not up to par, the wing size can't be pressed, and most of the fuselage space has to be occupied by lift, and the math is not good, and the experiment is not done to hold the big edge strips, and it is necessary to use a controllable vortex generator to prevent rollover, so you can only choose to put the flat tail on the nose and take into account the vortex generator and trim.

In fact, it is the scene of the make-up examination.

For aircraft that do not require ducks, such as the Su-27, F-15, F-16, MiG-29 and other well-known traditional powerhouses, the installation of ducks does not bring any kind of benefit to the flight.

As for why ducks were installed on the early Su-27 modifications and F-15 experimental models, it was actually because of the relevant attempts to CCV, and for statically stable aircraft such as Su-27 and F-15, there must be a means to move the aerodynamic center forward to become statically unstable, and the duck wings are easy to debug and can control loading and unloading, and they are adopted without changing the original design of the body, nothing more. And after trial production and testing and perfecting the flight control, we can see that the regular models of the Su-35 and F-15 have left the duck wings behind, and they don't even want to see the hairy things, so what is the use of thinking about it ourselves.

As for what are the aerodynamic characteristics of duck wings, it is estimated that the principle is useless to people who see J-20 on the head of chicken blood (I don't necessarily understand the knowledge level of chicken blood for 100 years), it is recommended that people with conditions play with fluid simulation by themselves, and they can make a water hole by hand, and the visualization should be well understood, so as to ensure that you laugh out loud.

In addition, there is a brush J-20 in the comments, but at present, the side strip of the miniature machine Thunder Dragon does not dare to change even a little bit, all kinds of stall side slippery and yaw things, and even the ** data does not show higher mobility than the F-4, and even the photographer turned the mobile phone 180 degrees to help it multi-disc and half-turn** acceleration times The recorder's own voice is nitrogen's "furious maneuver" is not faster than the F-15 air show circling, excellent or not.

In order to get on the ship, the fuselage structure was strengthened, and the weight was increased a lot, but the same engine was still used. The wing was enlarged, and the size of the fuselage was also increased. Moreover, its canard wing system is backward, and can only be deflected in the same direction and cannot be deflected differently.

In order to get on the ship, the fuselage structure was strengthened, and the weight was increased a lot.

I see that this ** is ps.

You look at the Bayi emblem like a fake.

This one should be the Indian Su-30MKI

and typhoon confrontation drills.

The logos on both planes are fake ......

The duck front wing, the tail is lowered and it should be an MKI of India! As for the typhoon, every no opinion!

There are about 300 of them, and I don't want to talk about those verbose words. Among them is the J-11A, which is a part of China Gas Huiguo assembled leather finger Russia. The J-11B was produced by China after it thoroughly ate Russian technology.

The J-11B is in many ways better than the Soviet Su-27.

Imported + domestic Su-27 series, foreign reports by the end of 2010 about 272.

I don't know what to say upstairs, there are only 175 original ones, and there are more than 200 of them that are modified by themselves, that is, replicas. More than three hundred in total!