Apple Games Magic Tower gives the ring to the princess or the same person

Who is the Tower Love Adventure Ring for?

There are a lot of friends who ask this question.,The main thing is the witch Selita and Rapunzel two choices.,Here the personal choice is for Rapunzel.,The reason is very simple.,The game is for you to rescue the princess.,Why give it to the witch? However, after looking at the choices of other players, some said that the game would be lost if it was given to the witch, and it was said that either of the two would not have an impact on the plot, but here it is still recommended to give the magic tower love adventure ring to the cute Rapunzel.

The format of the games running is not the same. The reason why it is said that Apple's configuration is lower than Android's but it can run smoothly and fast, is because of its basic UI rendering, and Apple's smoothness lies in this. There are many Android background programs, so the only way to increase the smoothness is to improve the configuration.

Many Apple games work perfectly as long as they are ported from the past.

Difference. It is generally described as poor when what is below a certain standard. This difference is generally universal.

Poor. Generally, this is applied in comparison with the same kind, and the one that is at a weak disadvantage is called poor. And the better ones are not necessarily universal.

In terms of tone, the worse tone should be lighter, because the worse is produced in the same kind of comparison, and the better than the (poor) can be excellent, for example, the runner-up relative champion in the Olympic track and field competition is the worse one! Generally we say that the runner-up is a little short of the champion. But ordinary people who dare to say that he is poor.

In scope, the worse contains the poor. For example, in school, we call the lower middle grades poor, and the bottom ones poor. But compared to the second-to-last, the first-to-last is the worse one, but the first-to-last is also the worst one.

Here, if not for the sake of criticism but for the sake of taking care of other people's ideas, we often put the penultimate into the worse category in our mouths and position ourselves as the worst in our hearts.

Therefore, I think that the tone of the poor should be lighter because of 1The better of the comparison can be higher than the universal, or even the top, then the comparison (worse) is not necessarily below the universality, or even higher than the universal. 2.

When we say worse, most people think that poor means a little worse, a little worse, and take this comparison for granted. I didn't expect that the worse can also be compared among the differences with universal significance, so as to produce the worse one! 3.

Several words in our vocabulary that are combined with (poor) have a heavier tone than (worse) ones, such as worse, worst, very poor, very poor. I didn't expect that poor is actually a combination of words and bad words. The difference in tone between them is actually the difference between the word and the word more-most-very-very.

Rather than a (worse) and worse tone difference.

There is a difference between poor and poor, so it is also different in application. However, in terms of human thinking, poor generally refers to below the standard. Worse is not necessarily.

In general, we rarely compare the first to last with the second to last to compare which is worse. Therefore, in life application, I take it for granted that poor is the kind that is almost out of the way. So it's (poor) even worse.

The difference and the worse of the worse can be higher than the standard. Good and relatively good are different from each other, and better can be below the standard.

I gave it to Rapunzel. Because this game is mainly about conquering the princess. But it's actually casual. Does not affect the game.