Debate: Do you need an exam to tap talents?

Describe the idea: first write your own argument, then argue your own argument, and finally summarize your own argument. Examples are:

We believe that examinations are required for the selection of talents. Throughout Chinese history, many thinkers and artists with outstanding contributions were born in the champion Jinshi Juren, as one of them, Han Yu.

He once wrote "Ma Said".

Emphasize the importance of talent. Imagine, if we put aside the exam today, the college entrance examination army of nearly 10 million people in the country every year wants the "Bole" to go to "Soma" one by one, how big a unit must this "Bole" army be? At least a million lions, right?

Not to mention the cost of venues, journeys, and time, just the cost of lost work in all walks of life.

It's a huge loss! In his book "The Examination of Chinese Thought in the West", the American sinologist Budd argues that the imperial examination is the most precious intellectual gift from China to the West. Today, even a superpower like the United States.

We all use the examination system and are deeply shocked by it, so why should we deny it?

It is the "test" that has laid a solid foundation for each dynasty; It is the "trial" that opens the door for each era! Yes, it was exams that changed human civilization.

The development process, and because of its fair effect, the examination has become the best way to select talents! It is not difficult to see that the birth of the examination is the starting point of the rise of a strong country and the crystallization of the wisdom of an era.

We affirm exams, not because they are the ultimate goal of life. On the contrary, exams as a means to serve their ends open the door to new platforms for us. We might say that "the exam doesn't select all talents."

Yes, there is no such thing as perfection. But at this moment, we should no longer pay attention to those who have jumped onto the glorious stage, but should be more sad for those who have no skills, but suffer from no platform, helpless to be buried, forgotten ambitions have not hesitated.

We must not only adhere to the college entrance examination system, but also open up more and wider examination venues for those who are depressed because of a failure in the college entrance examination, so that they can find their own place and contribute to the society! Yes, gold always shines, but if it is not dug out of the ground, it will not reflect the brilliant yellow waves. We are positioning ourselves in order not to bury gold in the ground.

When we are trying to find the nearest route between two points, please do not ignore it and skip it for the sake of convenience. Because so far, the examination is worthy of being the fairest, most just, most efficient and most objective authoritative system for selecting talents!

If the other party says that gold will always shine, then the landlord said that it is necessary to wait for the talents to shine together (humor, others will agree with your point of view).

The landlord takes everyone's opinions into account and organizes the language.

Finally, I wish the landlord a successful debate.

1. The selection of talents is to select the best in a specific field, which is a one-sided choice, not a comprehensive measurement, for example, we will not consider whether a singer can cook, and we will not examine the level of his football when selecting a professional manager.

2. Talent, first of all, talent, does not emphasize the issue of morality, in this issue is ahead of morality. But there is a problem here, that is, the lack of emphasis on morality does not mean that talents can lack morality.

3. Distinguish between examination and inspection. Exams should have standards and be quantifiable, but examiners should not.

4. Not measured by the final result. For example, in the case of applying for a pushpin, the applicant is admitted, but the recruiting company does not achieve their goal of selecting talents in a certain field, so there is no logical equality between the recruitment and selection of talents.

If there is no need for exams, then all people with outstanding or average grades can become "talents", so is it still a selection of talents? Instead, it becomes a selection of cleaners, and the exam is not necessarily a question on paper, and it can be proved through practice whether he is qualified to be a "talent"!

This debate is not good. Whether or not there is an examination for the selection of talents can only be made on a case-by-case basis and then a decision is made.

There are no rules, there is no comparison, there is no comparison, there is no gap, so how to judge who is a talent! It is also necessary to pay attention to the method and content of the exam, and do not think that the exam is a traditional kind of answer test, which can be in a variety of forms, and the content can also be moral and other aspects.

There was a person who applied for a job, but he was not selected, he picked up a thumbtack, and then he was moved by the story of the examiner Very good material, the selection of talents does not need to be examined Do a good job

I'm the one who argues three times.

Hope it helps.

I'm square three times, you have to help me find it.

I'm not the opposite, I'm not the opposite, I'm not the opposite.

OK means your point of view is that there is a need for exams to discover talents?

Right. You help me find a four-way argument.

Debate: Exams are needed to identify talent.

You click on this link to take a look.

Hello dear, when it comes to discovering talents, here are some questions and corresponding perspectives that may be early in the morning: Why is talent discovery critical to the success of an organization? Viewpoint:

Identifying talent is critical to an organization's success, as talent is a core competency of an organization. The best people bring innovation and creativity to drive the sustainable development of an organization. They have the expertise and skills to create value for the organization at all levels.

By discovering talent, organizations can effectively allocate and utilize human resources to improve work efficiency and competitiveness. What approach and strategy should organizations adopt when it comes to talent discovery? Viewpoint:

Organizations should adopt a variety of approaches and strategies to discover talent. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: Establish a reasonable talent recruitment and selection mechanism by attracting outstanding talents to the organization.

Develop internal talent and motivate the growth and development of employees by providing training and promotion opportunities. Establish a good performance management system to identify and reward outstanding talents through evaluation and incentive mechanisms. Establish a good talent relationship and teamwork atmosphere, and promote talent discovery and collaboration by encouraging communication and knowledge sharing.

How are potential talents evaluated and selected? Perspective: Evaluating and selecting potential talent requires a combination of factors.

In addition to professional knowledge and skills, attention should also be paid to the individual's potential, adaptability and teamwork ability. The ability and quality of potential talents can be assessed through interviews, case studies, assessments, etc. In addition, reference to past work experience, academic achievements and recommendation letters is also an important basis for evaluating talents.

Fourth, today we are discussing "whether there is a need for exams to discover talents". Excavation refers to the excavation of hidden things, and since it is excavation, it must be a long-term and dynamic process. The test is for the examiner to make questions about the aspects they want to know, and let the assessee answer them within the specified time and place.

This is a short-term, one-sided, temporary, and superficial process, and the argument that "examinations are a necessary condition for discovering talents" is obviously untenable. We reiterate once again that "there is no need for exams to discover talents"! Throughout the ages, how many talents have been buried because they have not passed the exam, and how many have made great contributions to society by failing to pass the exam.

Wu Chengen, a famous literary scholar in the Ming Dynasty, repeatedly failed in the imperial examination, but this did not prevent him from writing the world-famous "Journey to the West". Warren Buffett did not pass Harvard's entrance exam, but became a great investor in the financial field. He's a man who has been abandoned by exams, but can we say he's not talented?

All this, looking at ancient and modern China and foreign countries, how many people have not passed the exam have become talents! We do not deny that examinations can select talents, but this does not mean that examinations are necessary to discover talents. Blindly emphasizing the necessity of examinations can only lead to self-restraint and ultimately restrict the progress and development of society.

Only by constantly innovating in concepts can we make the development of human society faster and go further!

1。May I ask the opponent's defense friend, are you a talent selected by examination?

a. Yes. (The other party may modestly avoid the word talent, but it doesn't matter, you can treat it indifferently.) B. No. It seems that the exam may not be able to dig out talents!

2。Are you willing to admit that there are many of your classmates who did not get in, and there are also people who have some kind of expertise?

a. Willing. b. Unwilling. I think the audience can tell what is right and wrong.

3。So how can exams be the only means of discovering talent?

Whatever the other person answers, you have to cut it off in time, and then add to yourself: If so, then Edison will be very uncomfortable, because he may not have the money to take the test, and then Bill will also be uncomfortable, because he does not have such a deep idea as he does to study things that have nothing to do with Microsoft.

Let me start with the experience of the two debaters in the team, and the longest way to play the game is to ask the opponent questions so that they can't react in the short term, and I'm going to talk about how to achieve this: the first is to ask questions in a theoretical way, which is that you want to elevate your argument to theory. For example, do you need a way to discover talents?

2. And the examination is just a manifestation of this way, so why not need to take the exam to discover talents? And the way this kind of problem is actually a trap, and as for where the trap is, I guess as long as it's not on the field, you can react slowly, but it's very difficult on the field, and I've tried it again and again. There are also theoretical questions that have been discussed so far, for example:

From ancient times, from Lao Tzu and Confucius to the Bagu Wen Examination and then to the Palace Examination, we can see that our arguments have been selected from generation to generation, and the history of thousands of years tells us that the discovery of talents requires examinations, isn't it?

Then there is the offensive and defense stage, you must ask consecutive questions, and you have to be clear about what kind of question you are asking is to lay the groundwork for yourself, and how to ask this question, the trap is stronger, and then don't guess the opponent's answer before the game, remember that there may be any answer on the spot, and you must be well prepared to hold the whole game.

Good luck, if you have any questions, let's discuss it again.

Talent depends on the mouth and the ability to do things, not the pen. Does society need nerds?

Exams, that is only the embodiment of middle school examination-oriented education, Grandpa Deng once said: practice is the only criterion for testing the truth. Besides, what I got from the exam is not real!!

How did Zhao Kuo fail? Light will be on paper! No time experience!

Summary of the attack and defense.

The opponent's debater today demonstrated to us the advantages of the exam, and we do not deny the advantages of the exam, but the exam is beneficial to you, can you argue that the exam is needed to discover talents? There is also what the opposing defense friend has just discussed between our two sides today"Exams"The scope has expanded indefinitely, and it is absurd to conclude that all activities that embody differences are called examinations, then all actions in this world can be called examinations. We say that Tang Taizong Li Shimin is a good emperor, do we want to argue with us that the Xuanwumen Revolution is also an exam?

As a means of discovering talents, the examination is not conducive to the discovery of talents, and the examination method selects standardized and consistent people, rather than "talents", and its assumptions are wrong; As a means of discovering talents, examinations are not conducive to the cultivation of talents: examinations measure people's knowledge at most, rather than "behaviors" that are important for morality and behavior, and their selection is not called "talents".As a means of discovering talents, examinations are not conducive to talents playing a social role, and examinations are partially valid, and the system is ineffective, and their effects are partial and temporary.

What percentage of the population has made outstanding contributions in social positions without examinations?

Therefore, we firmly believe that there is no need for exams to discover talents! Thank you!