Qualcomm 615 and 805 that is good

1. In terms of manufacturing process, Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 uses a more advanced 20nm process, while Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 debuts late, but uses 28nm process, so in theory, Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 has better power consumption and heat control.

2. In terms of core frequency, both chips are 8-core design, of which Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 uses a more advanced A72 core, but the main frequency of Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 is lower than that of Qualcomm Snapdragon 810.

3. In terms of network system, Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 is obviously more forward-looking and supports the Cat 9 network, so the high-speed network experience is obviously better than the Snapdragon 810.

The 801 is much better The 801 is the flagship positioning, and the process is very mature, and there is no heating problem of the new and old 810.

615 positioning in the mid-range, even if it is still hot, 615 currently looks at who buys and who regrets.

801 is good, it is a flagship model, and 615 is a low-end model that Gao GM A53 tests the waters.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs 652 performance comparison:

1.From the comparison of mobile phone CPU parameters, Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 and Snapdragon 625 have their own characteristics, among which Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 has the advantage of using a more advanced 14nm manufacturing process and higher specification network support, and what is not mentioned is that it also adds dual cameras and fast charging technology support. The advantage of Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 is that it has stronger GPU specifications and supports dual-channel memory specifications

2.The Snapdragon 625 and Snapdragon 650 have their own highlights, with the Snapdragon 625 having a more advanced 14nm process, higher-spec network support, and the addition of dual cameras and fast charging support. We know that the Snapdragon 652 is mainly composed of two quad-core architectures, plus the frequency is lower, and the multi-core efficiency is not as good as the Snapdragon 625

Judging from the benchmark test, although the Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 is not as good as the Snapdragon 625 in terms of multi-core performance, the single-core and overall performance scores are much better.

From the perspective of comprehensive performance, Snapdragon 652 should outperform 34% of Snapdragon 625 in terms of running scores, Snapdragon 625 integrates Adreno506 GPU, and only supports single-channel LPDDR3 memory, while Snapdragon 652 integrates Adreno 510 GPU, supports dual-channel LPDDR3 memory, in terms of GPU, Snapdragon 625 is about 60% of 652.

All in all, it's not much worse. In terms of process, Snapdragon 625 is much more advanced, and Snapdragon 820 uses the same 14nm process process, focusing on power consumption and heat balance, so the chip has a lower heat and is more economical, it is positioned in the mid-range, its own power consumption and heating control is good, and the performance is also very good in the mid-range, so it is one of the best in the current mid-range processor. The Snapdragon 652 is positioned in the mid-to-high-end, its own performance is good, and its performance is close to Snapdragon 820, although the 28nm process process can barely be suppressed, but the degree of advancement is definitely not as good as 14nm, but if it is on 14nm, it must threaten the flagship Snapdragon 820, and the more advanced process, the cost will also increase, and the price will increase accordingly, instead of being relatively cheap like the current Snapdragon 652.

Although the performance of the Snapdragon 625 is worse than that of the Snapdragon 652, the models equipped with this processor are not much cheaper, probably because the cost of the two is not much different at all. The focus on performance is that the Snapdragon 652 is stronger, and it is believed that it does not need to be strong enough to use it, and it is not high to save heat when using it, that is, the Snapdragon 625 is more suitable. Regardless of the least up-to-date, they are already destined to be not a level in terms of numerical naming.

The 650 performs better, with 2 A72 high-performance cores;

625 only has A53 cores and no A72 cores, and the performance is much lower, and the advantage is that it adopts a new 14nm process, which has a lower power consumption.

Judging from the comparison of mobile phone CPU parameters, Snapdragon 625 and Snapdragon 650 have their own highlights, of which Snapdragon 625 has a more advanced 14nm process, higher specification network support, and also adds dual cameras and fast charging support. The highlight of the Snapdragon 650 is that it is equipped with a higher-spec GPU, supports dual-channel memory, etc.

In terms of CPU performance, Snapdragon 625 is not inferior to 650, the main reason is that Snapdragon 625 can run at the highest frequency of octa-core full blood, and Snapdragon 650 is composed of two sets of quad-core architectures after all, plus the frequency is slightly lower, multi-core efficiency is naturally discounted, the following is a comparison of running scores.

Judging from the benchmark test, although the single-core performance of the Snapdragon 625 is not as good as that of the Snapdragon 650, the multi-core performance is much better.

From the perspective of comprehensive performance, the Snapdragon 625 can be compared to the Snapdragon 650 in terms of CPU performance, but its GPU performance is quite different from that of the Snapdragon 652. The Snapdragon 625 integrates the Adreno 506 GPU and only supports single-channel LPDDR3 memory, while the Snapdragon 650 integrates the Adreno 510 GPU and supports dual-channel LPDDR3 memory, and in terms of GPU, the Snapdragon 625 is about 60% of the 652.

Here's where the Snapdragon 625 and 650 stand in the phone CPU ladder chart, as shown in the image below.

All have their own advantages and disadvantages, but overall there is not much difference.

The 625 is relatively lower than the 650, so it adopts the relatively new 14nm process, which brings lower power consumption and some new functions (refer to the figure below), but the positioning of the 625 itself is lower than that of the 650, although it is an 8-core processor.

Snapdragon 650 has stronger performance with two A72 large cores and Adreon510GPU blessing Playing games is more stable But the Snapdragon 650 process lags behind TSMC 28nm The power consumption is relatively high While the Snapdragon 625 process is advanced 14nm The main power saving performance is relatively weaker The CPU part is all small cores A53 Adreon506GPU is only two-thirds of the 510 Lacks a large core The game performance is a little worse If you play games, it is also recommended that the Snapdragon 650 has stronger performance Choose the Snapdragon 625 for daily use, which consumes less power and has stronger battery life.

The 650 is more powerful, but it consumes a lot more power.

625 performance is average, but it is more power-saving, depending on your actual use, if you want to have a long battery life, you will be 625, and if you want strong performance, you will be 650

Looking at the picture and speaking, Snapdragon 625 has the latest 14nm process power consumption on Snapdragon 625 is ahead, and on the CPU Snapdragon 625 is an octa-core full blood operation, but it is only comparable to Snapdragon 650.

On the GPU, the Snapdragon 650 directly crushes the Snapdragon 625, but in the Snapdragon 625's higher-spec network support, in addition to adding dual cameras and fast charging support.

Snapdragon 820 processor wireless network parameters: Snapdragon 820 is equipped with Qualcomm Vive, which supports tri-band Wi-Fi and supports Qualcomm's 2x2 Mu-MIMO (multi-user, multiple-in, multiple-out) technology launched in the summer.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 is pictured below