How much of an impact will the live streaming industry have on teenagers right now?

Webcasting is quite harmful to teenagers. Due to their poor self-control, teenagers are easily addicted to it and cannot extricate themselves, wasting time, wasting their youth, and abandoning their studies. Adolescence is an important stage in the formation of life values, and the erosion of adolescent values by online live streaming is particularly vigilant.

Affects adolescents' perception of right and wrong. There is a lack of adequate supervision of online live broadcasts, the quality of anchors is uneven, and most of the attitudes towards society, life, and feelings disseminated by them are negative and wrong. Adolescents have poor discernment and are easily misled.

The live broadcast platform has indeed created a kind of value orientation guidance for teenagers. You see that most of the 'Internet celebrities' are beautiful, and then ask for red envelopes in the live broadcast, and there are many people who earn more than one million yuan a year. In fact, these will invisibly affect the values of young people, and my value orientation will appear to pursue beauty and money, which is what I am more worried about.

Influence the concept of labor. Some Internet celebrity anchors earn 100,000 yuan a month, as if they can easily make a fortune without having to work hard and labor, sit in the house, and move their mouths. If this perception becomes mainstream, teenagers will become a languishing, sinking generation. ‍‍

Affect aesthetics. In order to gain popularity and attract attention, many live broadcasts constantly challenge the lower limit of vulgarity, challenge the bottom line of traditional morality, aesthetics, and culture, and distort aesthetics into "ugliness". ‍

Now the live broadcast industry will have a great impact on teenagers, and many young people don't go to school anymore.

Personally, I think that if this continues, many students will not study seriously, and many people will not want to go to work, which will bring great harm to the society.

It should have a big impact, after all, teenagers will not have strong self-control, and it is easy to lose themselves.

Which live streams? The live broadcast of teaching must be conducive to learning, and it would not be good if it was the kind of live broadcast of beautiful women, which would make people addicted but not get practical things. ‍‍

In the field of online live broadcasting, there are many people with a monthly salary of three to five thousand who are willing to reward the anchor lavishly. This phenomenon may seem irrational, but there are profound reasons for it. ......Specifically, the reason why these people with low incomes are willing to reward anchors lavishly is because they seek an illusory sense of identity, a sense of dependence and companionship in their hearts, and a sense of impulse caused by vanity.

1. In order to seek an illusory sense of identity, many people with low monthly salaries go to reward anchors.

The reason why many people with low monthly salaries will go to reward anchors lavishly is to seek an illusory sense of identity. ......These people are more introverted and often do not get recognition in their daily lives and work, so they are more depressed in their hearts and want to be recognized. And through the anchor, they can get this sense of recognition, so they feel very happy, so they will reward the anchor.

2. Some people reward anchors because they feel dependent and accompanied.

Some people give tips because they have a sense of dependence and companionship on the anchor. ......These people are often lonely in their daily lives and lack the company of filial piety. Therefore, they are very eager to be cared for and loved by others.

Through the streamer, they find this feeling of dependence and companionship, which is why they will be rewarded.

3. There are also some people who reward the anchor because of vanity that leads to impulse.

In addition to the above two reasons, there is another kind of emotional stool situation that cannot be ignored, that is, some people go to reward the anchor because of the impulse caused by vanity. ......These people didn't want to tip, but in the process of communicating with the anchor, they were influenced by other people and had vanity, so they would tip the anchor on impulse. ......All of the above behaviors will cause the people who reward the main spring sowing to suffer losses, so it is necessary for them to sober up in time and correct their wrong behavior.

1.Positive impact on young people.

2.Negative impact on adolescents.

I think there are pros and cons to this, the disadvantage is that teenagers are easy to indulge in that kind of game live broadcast, and the advantage is that teenagers can learn from excellent teachers through live webcasting.

To a certain extent, it will affect teenagers, teenagers' minds are still immature, and they are still in the cognitive stage of society, and some bad thoughts or behaviors in the live broadcast will affect them.

Yes, many people pursue "rapid followers" for the so-called data, which gives teenagers a very impetuous social atmosphere, thinking that they can succeed by participating in live broadcasts, but in fact, we still need to study hard to be useful.

There will definitely be an impact, but the whole impact is also two-sided, and it's also great to be able to learn a lot about society without leaving home.

There are good and bad, the good thing is that the information is more developed, and children can broaden their horizons without leaving home, and the bad thing is that the live broadcast platform of information will affect the young people's view of right and wrong, and it is difficult for children to distinguish between good and bad information, and it is easy to go astray.

It will definitely have an impact, and many teenagers** live broadcasts have delayed their normal life, work and study,

I think it's good, because through the media, we can learn more things, for example, the animal world, news broadcasts, which are all things that everyone should watch. The disadvantage is that some students watch TV without moderation, which not only affects their eyesight, but also is not good for learning. Still, if you watch TV in moderation, it's still beneficial.

The enormous power of the mass media has become an important factor influencing social processes in modern society. Its subversion of social traditions, filling of social gaps, and transformation of social forces are all areas that we must pay sufficient attention to. In particular, its structure and reconstruction of contemporary Chinese values is the decisive factor in the formation of new values, which in turn guides people's social behavior.

How can we use this tremendous power? The great changes of the times have caused the whole society to be in extreme turmoil, of course, this change does not exist in the form of war, but is achieved by the drastic change of concepts, the disappearance of tradition, and other changes in the internal cultural factors of society. The concept of value determines that the subject is based on the reference system of its demand system, and will take the initiative to integrate the value or value relationship between the subject and the object, which fundamentally embodies the subject's wishes, requirements, desires, ideals, needs, interests, and so on.

The correct use and interpretation of the mass media has endless guiding significance for the theme's wishes, demands, desires, and interests under this concept. And with regard to the many social ills of modern society, such as the vigorous rise of vulgar culture, the spiritual crisis of the younger generation, and so on, is there not the slightest fault of the mass media?

We interact with the media every day, such as books, television, etc., and don't people say that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages for us?

Those students who get worse and worse because of watching TV are because they have poor control ability, and if they can consciously watch TV on the premise of completing their study tasks, there will be no such results. So, you can't blame the TV, you can only blame them for their poor control.

Since you think that TV is bad, you don't watch TV if you have the ability, can you do it?

Media includes: books, newspapers, magazines, television, radio, the Internet, etc. Obviously, we can't do without books every day, and we have to deal with books every day, so it can be seen that books definitely do more good than harm to us.

Magazines and newspapers can also help us expand our horizons and increase our knowledge. There is also television and radio, although some of them are not good for us teenagers, but most of them are also good for us.

The growth of our young people is closely related to the media all the time, and it helps us learn a lot of unknown knowledge and tell us a lot of principles of life, which is enough to show that it is more beneficial than harmful to us young people.

Although there are more live broadcast platforms now, they have also set up projects for teenagers, you just need to click into the youth version, and it's okay, it shouldn't have an impact on the worldview of teenagers.

It will definitely affect, and the values declared by many live broadcast platforms are problematic. To be honest, a lot of streamers are not of high quality, and 95% of the side you see from streamers is carefully dressed. Adults have fun and teenagers are better off staying away.

There are a lot of live broadcast platforms now, and the anchors are talking about some meaningless topics, many of them are selling goods, and watching them eat, and some of the speakers ridicule that there is no level, and watching the live broadcast will also be addictive, try not to watch it, watching too much will also affect your worldview, it is better to read more books, which will also be meaningful.

It's been affected for a long time. It's just that no one cares.

This depends on the remarks in the live broadcast room and the civilization of the anchor.

You're right, anything is possible.

It's still going to have an impact.

That's right, there are all kinds of anchors now, they waste students' study time, do some crooked things, so that it affects children's minds and makes them rebel against the family.

It will have an impact, so now many live broadcast platforms are also out of the youth mode, but parents should try to restrain their children, don't always play with mobile phones to watch live broadcasts, and teach them the correct values and outlook on life.

Nowadays, there are not only many live broadcast platforms, but also chaotic, and the management is not in place, anyone can broadcast live, and any topic can be talked nonsense, confusing the mainstream thinking, causing a decline in national cohesion, and to a certain extent, affecting the formation of young people's world view, which should be paid attention to.

Definitely! Therefore, the state issued a red article, which explicitly ordered anchors to pay attention to their own words and deeds.