What lens is good for Canon 450D? If you want to bring anti shake, don t be too expensive

First of all, it is highly recommended that you grit your teeth on the last 24-105 4L, more than 6000, I don't know if it is too expensive for you. After all, Canon users still have to take the L head as the ultimate goal, this head is a very practical and will never regret the cost-effective L head, Canon's original universal head masterpiece, tourist portrait sweeping street taking into account, with IS anti-shake, must be given priority.

If you can't afford to go up to 24-105, choose the original 55-250 IS, which happens to be connected to the 18-55 focal length, and the telephoto is also available. But the imaging really can't be compared with the L head.

I don't think the stabilization of the head of the factory is very reliable, so I don't recommend it.

Digression: There is no need to be so obsessed with anti-shake, buy one that is not anti-shake, and save the anti-shake money on a good tripod is the ultimate destination of most SLR users.

Addendum: 17-85 is okay but I don't recommend it very much, the reason is to buy one sleeve and buy another sleeve, I think I can't accept it psychologically. The reason why 24-105 or 55-250 is recommended is that since there is already a sleeve, it is better to consider focal length complementation first.

Traveling? That's still the last big zoom lens is more convenient.

18-55 is indeed a bit short, if paired with 55-250, that's fine, but with two lenses to travel I don't know if you can accept --- travel or light. In addition to this, the original factory also has 17-85is to consider, the deputy factory has Sigma's 18-200, this head has two versions, one is non-anti-shake, the other is anti-shake, the price of anti-shake is higher, the cost performance is average, not as good as the non-anti-shake 18-200

24-105 is a full-frame 5D jumper, used in 450D on the lens will be discounted, that wide-angle advantage is immediately gone, if you travel, the wide-angle is still very necessary, so on this head, be cautious.

It's often more worthwhile to bring a lightweight tripod. Anti-shake is not a panacea, and if the light is too dark, it is still not good.

You just buy a Canon 40d pullover, which is already very useful to you. It's about 4100 fast to buy a lens alone. However, you can find a dealer to buy a 40d dismantling head, which only costs 3000 to get on the second floor.

Sigma's 18-200 has a stabilization version, just to mention.

24-105, red circle. **Within 10,000. It is a 5D set lens.

The 28-300 I use myself, but the weight is a bit heavy, and everything else is very good, so you can consider it.

1. Professional macro heads are all the same.

Fixed focal head. That is, the focal length of the lens is fixed, such as Canon. The prime head is macro because of its large aperture, good image quality, and the ability to shoot 1:1 or even larger magnification.

Look no further. 2. The so-called 1:1 means that the actual size of the photographed object is the same as the size of its image on the photosensitive component. 1:, it's worse, the image size is only half of the original size, and there are even those who take larger images than the original object.

Sharpness. Bokeh has nothing to do with it.

3. Canon has a total of 5 macro heads, leaving aside the top macro 180mm

Super Macro. The three heads, 65mm and 50mm, which can only shoot 1:, are the only ones left with the big names.

Baiwei. and non.

Full frame. Lens.

That's all it can use.

The only option. Already:

Canon EF100mm. The latest**3680 yuan.

Depending on the situation you provide, it is used to shoot long-distance moving objects,**Around 2000 yuan-3000 yuan,There is no particular suitability,It should be okay for this one:Canon。

ef70-300mm

f There is also the Canon.

ef-s55-250mm

fi, Canon.

ef75-300mm

f iii ** is not expensive, the focal length is at the long end.