If you want human civilization to progress, which one is more useful, atheism or theism?

Since ancient times, why have theistic Western countries been stronger than atheistic China?

Everyone has their own beliefs, people in many countries believe in gods, but most of the Chinese have been atheists since ancient times, many people believe in their ancestors, this is China's unique belief culture, this culture has also made China a global domination for a long time, but the industrial age began, Western countries began to catch up, most countries surpassed China.

Now that China is the world's second largest economy, we have to admit that most of the developed countries in the West are still more powerful in science than China, which makes one wonder why the Western countries, which are predominantly theist, are more powerful than China, which is predominantly atheist.

Since Jesus, various religions began to rise gradually, they began to constantly suppress all kinds of science and technology, hindering the development of human civilization, many people think that faith hinders the development of science in Western countries, but in fact, it is the hearts of the people who are doing tricks, some religions just to control their own rights, using faith to imprison people's minds.

There are many great scientists who are people of faith, because they believe that faith is a powerful existence, so faith has promoted the development of Western civilization and Western science to a large extent, which is fundamentally different from China.

Ancient China does have a lot of belief in ghosts and gods, but most of them are used to control the props of civilians, no one really has a faith, which is also a pity, but fortunately now China has found its own way of development, I hope that China can go its own way, let science develop, we actually do not need to let Chinese change their beliefs, now the unique ancestral belief of Chinese is also a very powerful force.

I think that human progress is scientific development and progress, not some kind of human argument or something. Atheism and theism, I don't think it's too useful.

Atheism. Because science and technology promote the progress of human civilization, theism will only make human civilization more superstitious, and it is not conducive to the progress of human civilization.

Atheism. Atheists are more focused on self-development and promoting progress through their own efforts, rather than pinning their hands on God for human development.

Atheism is greater because of unscrupulousness;

Theism can easily degenerate into mystical superstition, and superstition is not insignificant.

Superstition: Blind pursuit without knowing why.

"Theism" and "atheism" are both a kind of belief and a kind of world view, and both are harmless in themselves.

Within the "theistic" system of thought, God is certainly correct. Within the "atheistic" system of thought, atheism is certainly correct.

I am afraid that one side will insist that the other party admit that its own point of view is correct and that the other party's point of view is wrong, then there will be a fight.

In order to prove the correctness of its arguments, it is understandable that any religion will use various arguments (basis, evidence) and methods of argumentation to prove the correctness of its views.

There is no distinction between high and low in any faith, no religion.

There are gods and men who have fear, and people without gods are presumptuous.

Science has nothing to do with godlessness.

The true meaning of science lies in logic and utilization. A thing that cannot be explained logically cannot be confirmed and understood by people as it is, and the inability to understand it indicates that the thing cannot be accommodated and used in the system of scientific creation. A thing that cannot be used, even if it exists, has little to do with science.

Science is only a means of arguing that all things in an event, even the gods. In a broad sense, science does not deny the existence of gods. But in the absence of scientific evidence.

Gods are not included in the scientific system. In other words, the existence of gods is not recognized within the scientific system because there is no evidence. But this does not prevent people from using science to verify the existence of gods.

No. The essence of a theist is that the world is governed by an absolute idea, which is truth itself. Atheists, on the other hand, believe that there is no absolute truth in the world at all, and that truth is always transferred with the transfer of conditions, which is conditional and relative.

From the perspective of Buddhism, there are no people and gods.

Human beings do not need to develop to a god-level civilization to overthrow atheism, and extreme atheism does not exist. After all, human beings can create intelligent machines through their own brains, and in another sense, human beings are equivalent to gods. <>

1. Creationism seems to have our impression that immortals are all around our thoughts, whether it is Nuwa and Pangu in China, or various gods and immortals in foreign countries. Creationism seems to revolve around the history of human civilization, and even influenced human thought and values. For example, Pangu in China opened up the world and used his own flesh and blood to incarnate heaven, earth, mountains and rivers.

Foreign gods created the heavens and the earth from the chaos, and used magic to transform all things in the world. And from all kinds of myths and legends, it seems that the legends of the East and the West seem to be the same. <>

2. God created all things and created mankindIt seems that in some religious thoughts, God created everything in the world, and human beings were also created. But the universe is naturally generated, and life is derived from the time and years of the universe. Since life can be formed, the possibility of being created cannot be ruled out.

Ordinary atheism is logical, but extreme atheism is contrary to the common sense of facts. Because we don't know if the universe was created or not, and we don't need humans to evolve into gods, we can overturn atheism. After all, with the development of human technology, we can already create countless creatures by using our magical brains.

In the eyes of those who were created, human beings were the gods of civilization. <>

3. Atheism is contrary to common senseMoreover, the atheism propagated by those religions simply does not stand up to logical scrutiny, and has long been unrecognizable through the evolution of time and transmission. Those atheisms are just a belief in people's hearts, in fact, whether there are gods or not depends on what individuals think in their hearts, and nature is also a god relative to human beings.

Overthrow, but we also have to respect atheists.

The degree to which human civilization can develop is determined by the culture of the Axial Age of mankind. Kick-start Axial Age culture, right now. The culture of the Axial Age was human, not divine.

Therefore, what mankind will build will not be a society of God, but a society of man. For example, in the future, the people of the Datong world will be pure and kind, and this is the state of life that people should have, not the state of God. In other words, the state of God, even if human beings reach the world of Datong, is still a myth.

It is God who has passed on to man the proper state of human culture, not God. In this sense, atheism is correct.

It can be overturned that atheism is the manifestation of reason and the embodiment of the progress of human civilization under the development of science.

I think there will come a time when atheism can be overthrown. Atheism is a view of life that respects knowledge and reveres nature, and is an expression of being a guest and believing in oneself.

Different views exist and are justified, so we cannot completely dismiss atheism.