Sunday at Flaubert s House What descriptions does the author use to shape the characters personalit

This article describes the portrait, language, and actions of each character, as well as the communication between the characters, showing the author's optimistic, positive, and upward attitude towards life and creative enthusiasm. To study this text, we must first grasp the appearance and personality traits of the four writers about whom the author writes, as well as the writing style.

The author captures the characteristics of the portraits and personalities of the four writers, and each focuses on their portraits, actions, and language. Whichever writer is most distinctive in which aspect is emphasized. Portraits of all four writers are depicted, with Zola being the most detailed and specific, followed by Dude, and the portraits of these two writers are in stark contrast.

In terms of language description, the specific content of the conversations of the four writers was not written in detail, but the authors summarized the content of their conversations, but they made a lot of descriptions of the tone and demeanor of their conversations; Some comments were also made on their eloquence. In terms of action description, there are details and omitting, Flaubert is the central character of the whole text, and the description of his actions is of course more detailed; Zola's sitting posture is more peculiar, and there are more pen and ink descriptions; There is only one description of Turgenev's actions. The portraits, actions, and language of the four writers were written in order to express their character traits.

What is the role of the author inserting some lyricism and argumentation in the middle of the narrative and description?

It helps to reveal the character traits of the characters and make the reader get to know these four writers more deeply. For example, about Turgenev's meeting with Flaubert, the author argues: "...The two often hit it off, and when they met, they both invariably felt a joy that was not so much mutual understanding as an inner joy of the heart.

The argument here tells the reader that because Turgenev and Flaubert shared common ideas and philosophical views, common interests, life and dreams, the same literary ideas and ideas, fanatical ideals, and common connoisseurship and erudition, they had long gone beyond the "pleasure of mutual understanding" but "the inner joy of the soul", so that the reader could have a deeper understanding of the relationship between the two great writers.

Hope o( o thank you.)

Sorry, I really haven't seen it.

== Colleagues, I'm also looking for a solution.

Describe the lack of portrait code, language, and action of each character, and the slow spine communication between the characters.

It shows the author's optimistic, positive and upward attitude towards life and enthusiasm for creation.