Wearing high heels or ancient foot bindings, which one makes girls suffer more?

Updated on vogue 2024-03-10
9 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    In ancient times, foot binding was the most sinful, it wrapped a woman's toes out of shape, which was not only ugly, but also painful. Although it is tiring to wear high heels, it looks good, and good high heels are comfortable to wear.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It must be the ancient foot binding, which has violated the normal growth and development of the foot, resulting in foot deformity, and wearing high heels if the right choice will not lead to foot deformation.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Of course, it's foot wrapping, you can take it off and relax if you feel uncomfortable wearing high heels, it's not the same when you wrap your feet, the process is long and painful, and wrapping it well will bring a lifetime of inconvenience!

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Of course, it's foot wrapping, and wrapping feet hurts the muscles and bones, and high heels are nothing in comparison!

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Personally, I think that these two ways are quite sinful, the most sinful is the ancient foot binding, this pain is far greater than wearing too high heels, it was born when I was a child, and the bones were broken, and it was a kind of small foot that was formed, which was quite painful.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    This depends on which period, the Ming Dynasty was basically popularized, and the Qing Dynasty developed to the extreme!

    Actually, it depends on the conditions!

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Ancient Chinese women's foot binding arose in the Northern Song Dynasty, and Chinese women did not bind their feet five generations ago. The Song Dynasty poet Su Dongpo once made a special word for "Bodhisattva Man", and sang about foot binding. "Don't cherish the lotus to take steps, and worry about Luo socks Lingbo; I saw the dance back to the wind, but there was nowhere to go.

    stealing the palace is stable, and standing double falling; It should be difficult to say delicately, and it must be seen from the palm of your hand. This can also be called the first poem in the history of Chinese poetry dedicated to foot binding. It should be noted that the writing of foot-binding poems is dependent on the emergence of foot-binding customs, which shows that foot-binding customs did appear in the Song Dynasty.

    By the time of the Southern Song Dynasty, women's foot binding was more common, and even at the end of the Southern Song Dynasty, "small feet" had become a common name for women. However, in the Southern Song Dynasty, women's foot binding was not yet popular, and foot binding was mainly limited to the upper class, and foot binding in social concepts had not yet reached the point where everyone accepted it. At the same time, the custom of foot-binding spread from the north to the south, around the time when the Song dynasty moved south.

    The foot binding of the Song Dynasty is different from the three-inch golden lotus of later generations. According to historical records, foot binding in the Song Dynasty was to wrap the feet "straight" but not arched, which was called "fast on the horse" at that time. The shoes used are called "wrong to the end", and their soles are sharp and composed of two colors.

    At present, the actual object of this foot-binding shoe has been found in archaeology. It is inferred from archaeological finds that the small feet wrapped around these shoes were larger than those of later times.

    After the Mongol nobles entered the Central Plains Jianyuan, they did not bind their feet, but they did not object to the foot-binding habits of the Han people, on the contrary, they still had an appreciative attitude. In this way, the trend of foot binding in the Yuan Dynasty continued to develop, and in the last years of the Yuan Dynasty, there was even a concept of being ashamed of not binding feet. Women's foot binding in the Yuan Dynasty continued to develop in the direction of slenderness, but there were still many people who did not bind their feet at this time, especially in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Lingnan regions in the south.

    In the Ming Dynasty, the trend of women's foot binding entered a prosperous period and developed rapidly in various places. At the end of the Ming Dynasty, when Zhang Xianzhong entered and occupied Sichuan, he cut off women's small feet, and piled up into a mountain, called Jinlian Peak, which can be seen that women in Sichuan area are bound to their feet. During this period, there were also certain requirements for the shape of the foot, and the women's small feet should not only be small, shrinking to three inches, but also bowed, and wrapped into the shape of horns.

    After the Manchu rulers came to dominate the Central Plains, they at first vigorously opposed the Han people's custom of binding their feet, and repeatedly ordered that women's foot binding should be forbidden. But at this time, the wind of foot binding was difficult to stop, and it had to be banned in 1668 AD (the seventh year of Kangxi). This incident was once rendered by people as "men surrendering to women who are not satisfied" - the Qing soldiers entered the customs, there was a "shaving order", and under the high pressure of force, the Han men finally had to give in to the execution, so the men.

    Shaving, seen as a symbol of submission to the Qing court. At the same time, although women's foot binding was also ordered to stop by the Qing court, it did not achieve the purpose of prohibiting it later, so there is a saying that "men descend to women do not descend". This shows that the practice of foot binding is deeply rooted.

    It is precisely because of this that women's foot binding reached its peak in the Qing Dynasty, and women from all walks of life, regardless of rich or poor, all bound their feet. Even some ethnic minorities in the far northwest and southwest have been infected with the custom of foot binding.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    This is a morbid aesthetic caused by the ancient people's admiration for women's small feet - three-inch golden lotus for beauty.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Foot binding first began in 969-975 AD during the reign of Li Yu in the Southern Tang Dynasty, when a lady of the Empress Li was ingenious and used silk to wrap her feet into a crescent moon shape and dance on the golden lotus to please the Son of Heaven. Later, this custom gradually spread to the common people, and women regarded foot binding as beauty. At that time, the feudal literati and scholars had a morbid aesthetic, regarded women as playthings, and it became a habit to play with women's small feet.

    In addition, in ancient times, there was a traditional custom of "men are superior to women" in a patriarchal society, and women would go out less when they were unable to move after binding their feet, so foot binding has also become an important way to restrain women.

    In ancient times, after the women's feet were bound, people called them "three-inch golden lotus". This little foot covered with strips of cloth became the most private part of the body, and it was reserved for his own man. At that time, small feet were never to be seen or touched by other men.

    If she is accidentally touched, this woman will be regarded as the greatest shame in her life.

    Binding small feet first began during the reign of Li Yu in the Southern Tang Dynasty in 969-975 AD, and some people believe that as early as the Warring States Period in 770-476 BC, binding small feet appeared, and perhaps even earlier can be traced back to the Shang Dynasty. In short, the custom of feudal society has a long history, and it has killed countless Chinese women for thousands of years. It can be said that binding small feet is one of the most prominent manifestations of "male superiority and female inferiority" under the patriarchal tradition.

Related questions
7 answers2024-03-10

When an organization transforms into a platform, this is definitely a challenge for functions that are positioned as "back-of-house", especially for HR. The main dimension of the traditional bureaucratic organization is "wealth", and "people" and other resources revolve around "wealth", and it can also be said that traditional management is "seeing things but not people". The main dimension of the new platform organization is "people", and "finance" and other resources revolve around "people", and if "people" cannot be revitalized, the organization cannot be revitalized. >>>More

15 answers2024-03-10

If you are middle-aged, of course, it is love, and if you are young, it is best to put your career first, so that you can have the foundation of love. It is often difficult to distinguish between the two, because they are so important to us, indispensable, but which is more important depends on when, you can tell your her (him), for example, at the critical intersection of your career, your focus may be biased towards the career, and after this period of relief, you must give you a promise of her (him) love, and at the critical moment of love, you must temporarily sacrifice your career for love. There are many things that are important, but it is also difficult to deal with them for the rest of their lives, just like everything has priorities, and the same is true of the intersection of love and career, and when necessary, a little sacrifice is needed in exchange for accomplishing more important things at that moment, I think if she (he) should be able to understand. >>>More

6 answers2024-03-10

The U.S. has used the war between the tests to describe the relationship between the SAT and the ACT. Open the Common Application Form for U.S. universities, and in the Standard Level Test field, there is an option: whether you are taking the ACT or SAT test. >>>More

11 answers2024-03-10

In the workplace, which is more important, emotional or rational?

9 answers2024-03-10

Nightmares are fast and do high damage. The late teamfight cut is great. Moreover, the visual obstruction caused by the ultimate move can easily make the opponent confused. >>>More