China hits India to his capital

LZ is wrong, right? It's not like I haven't fought with India. In just a few days our troops approached New Delhi, but retreated.

Got it? What is it that fights the war? It's national strength, if you go deep into the battle, you have to ensure logistics, otherwise do you think Grandpa Mao doesn't want to hit their capital?

Why can it be played all the way to New Delhi. On the one hand, it is because our army has rich combat experience, and there is also the lack of senior commanding generals in India (a brigadier general has been captured) The troops are in the rear, and the tanks and artillery are not suitable for fighting in the mountains, so Grandpa Mao let it out, I think that if you fight India, you can let it go to our country to fight, India is a country that is very conceited (so you understand?). Drain their vital forces,) cut off their logistical supply lines, and say that these are nonsense, in a word, India can't do China.

These countries don't know the height of the sky, and Yelang is arrogant, so it's enough to teach a lesson. China's diplomacy adheres to the five cardinal principles, adheres to the principle of active defense, is reasonable, beneficial, modest, and stops in moderation, and does not aim at aggression and expansion.

Fight, you can look up the Sino-Indian War, or the Republic Defense War - Sino-Indian War.

Hit. Instant spikes. However, after the victory, we withdrew from the disputed area. Get ready to negotiate!

Instead, they occupy all the disputed areas!

This is a great shame! Victorious, but lost the land.

If you win a war but lose a large amount of land, can this be called a win?

Territorial disputes did not hit people's capitals.

This is empiricist thinking. China's crossing of the Yalu River with a population advantage created the first defeat for the United States, and also helped Vietnam defeat the United States. The habitual thinking that India's population is growing rapidly, and in the final analysis, the population is young is large, which is a narrow thinking.

In my opinion, China is not a belligerent country, but China is not afraid of war. Because:

1. China's current economic strength is fine.

2. The Chinese nation has a sense of resistance to injustice in its blood.

3. History tells the people that there is no dignity in being occupied, and there are many people who have experienced it.

4. The concept of land is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, and the people support and defend it.

5. The people are well aware of the main and minor contradictions.

Based on the above, China's strength is at its best. will not be afraid of India or any country;

Of course, it is still hoped that a negotiated solution can be resolved.

Whether it is comprehensive strength or future development, China is stronger than India. Modern India is a bit like the Soviet Union at that time, always trying to dominate, and India's strength is far less than the glory of the Soviet Union at that time. They only know how to blindly develop their military and blindly pursue the advanced, but their domestic technology is too far behind China's, and they do not have China's graduality, so India is not China's opponent.

If India has to say that it can win against China, then their population will surpass China's, and this is theirs"Victory".