Should China retain the imperial family?

Many countries in the world do not ... Often in these countries there is a history of revolutions that completely overthrow the original regime... The Qing Dynasty was completely overthrown by the Xinhai Revolution led by Sun Yat-sen, and the dynasty no longer existed.

It has ended the history of Han rule for hundreds of years by foreigners, which is also the wish of many Han people! Later generations were very vigilant about the corruption of the imperial dynasty, and there was no need to set up a royal family if they were overthrown, and the revolutionaries at that time were also determined to eliminate backward systems such as the imperial dynasty.

The royal families of Europe and Japan are different from ours, firstly, they are the same people, the main thing is that hundreds of years ago it was under the leadership of the royal family that they became stronger and stronger, and the people's feelings towards the royal family were completely different, and the people admired the king very much. On the contrary, our Qing Dynasty is leading our country to corruption and decline, and the people hate the Qing Dynasty to the core!! After the Xinhai Revolution, these Aisheng Jueluo were driven out, and it was not like the British who set up a parliament to retain the royal family...

The Japanese worshipped the emperor like a god, because the Meiji Restoration turned Japan into a powerful country. Even the defeat in World War II was short-lived, and it did not weaken the people's worship of the emperor. It's hard to compare our former dynasty with others...

I had thought about this before, but then I felt that an unsuccessful royal family would be the symbol of our country. Absolutely not suitable. The royal family is passed down from generation to generation, if you don't look for Aisheng Jueluo, who can you find? New to the new position? Why bother !!

This is a problem of the system and a problem of tradition ... If we hadn't overthrown the monarchy back then, where would we be living today? And you see that the British and Japanese imperial families basically have nothing, it's just a matter of faith among the people.

Why didn't China keep the royal family like the West?

No, the royal family uses taxpayers' money. Doing nothing, a bunch of rice buckets, is a symbol of the oppression of the working people, they keep it because their people are stupid and cheap, this is the result of the bourgeoisie's compromise with the feudal landlord class, it is a manifestation of the incomplete revolution, what is this garbage going to do? Moreover, there are many things that symbolize China, such as the Great Wall, Tiananmen Square, Confucius and so on.

No, but there may be royal descendants, just like ordinary people, who will not have royal privileges like the Netherlands.

There was no abolition of the monarchy as early as 1911.

After the fall of the Qing Dynasty in China, the small Qing court was retained at that time, but only in the imperial palace. In 1924, Pu Yi was driven out of the Forbidden City by Feng Yuxiang. The Chinese imperial family cannot be considered to exist, because it is not recognized. After Pu Yi's death, there were no descendants, and there were no so-called heirs.

The imperial family came into existence based on the existence of the emperor, and now that there is no emperor, of course there is no royal family. Otherwise, the descendants of the three emperors and five emperors in history, Qin, Han, Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming, and Qing all belong to the descendants of the royal family, especially the Qing Dynasty of Xinjueluo is closest to us, and it can only be said that they were once descendants of the royal family, not the royal family. And Liu Bei has done his best to the point of weaving mats and weaving shoes, but the Han still exists, he is the royal family, and he can be called the emperor's uncle.

Don't listen to the nonsense upstairs, the descendants of Xinjueluo have already reached tens of thousands, not to mention now, but most of them have been incognito, and their surnames have been changed to Khan, Pu Yi's biological brother, Pu Ren is still alive...

Why didn't China keep the royal family like the West?

China has a kind of democratic ideology of princely general Xiangning, the emperor's blood inheritance is weak, mainly talent, so the imperial family will not be retained, and China's republic is mainly the result of the development of its own political theory, not the result of learning from the West.

Why didn't China keep the royal family like the West?

1. Today, capitalism is highly developed, and it is the concession and respect of the imperial power in the last few centuries, which helped establish the famous parliamentary system in Britain while giving up most of the secular power. The parliamentary system provided capitalists, social activists, politicians, and commoners and aristocrats with equal opportunities to participate in the country's affairs and maintain the functioning of the state power system. Thus, the royal family was thus able to move away from the disputes of secular politics and gradually from the center of political struggle, so that it would not be hostile and overthrown by the capitalists or other people involved in politics.

2. Although feudalism and the monarchy were far removed from secular politics, yet as a right reserved after the concession of imperial power, the British royal family, and especially the British monarch, was established and respected by Parliament and the people as the protector of the English religion, the head of the Commonwealth and the lord of the British territory, enjoying a high position in name, and being the head of state representing the British nation, transcending all parties, and thus, the remnants of the British monarchy and monarch, for the unity of the state.

First, national unity plays an important role. No party or organization can completely overthrow and abolish the supreme nominal status and the head of state that exist in the royal family.

3. The British monarch still retains three important secular rights: the right to be consulted, the right to give advice, and the right to warning. As the nominal supreme ruler, and de facto the unifier of the British cross-party and organisational community, she, he often has supreme honour, status, prestige, and experience, and as a result, the British monarch is often, and always is, consulted the British monarch on all aspects of governance.

The British monarch can also take various opportunities to provide various suggestions to the **, parliament and the prime minister, and because the monarch is the highest symbol of the country, he or she can also use various opportunities to give policy warnings to the **, parliament and head of state who have seriously violated discipline and disappointment, and use him, her prestige and status to force the other party to accept.

4. The British monarch can exist as a king or queen, depending on the gender of the first heir. If the gender of the first heir is male, it is His Majesty the Prince. If the first heir is a woman, it is Her Majesty the Princess, who will be the king or empress when she ascends the throne.

Britain has a constitutional monarchy, and of course it is necessary to retain the royal family.

This was the result of a compromise between the old and new aristocracy and the new capitalism in the Glorious Revolution.

Because Britain is a bourgeois constitutional monarchy.

The people of the royal family, there should be no Qing Dynasty fell in 1911. It's been more than 100 years.

Yes. Love Xinjue Roche. Due to historical problems, most of them now changed their surnames to Jin, and they called their parents Ama and Eniang, and most of them said that they were nobles of Zhenghuangqi (at that time, the children of the Eight Banners, the purest bloodline was Zhenghuangqi).

There is basically no orthodoxy, the orthodoxy of the Qing Dynasty should be regarded as nothing, and now it is a side branch like Puyi, there should be a Ming Dynasty, no one knows where the singular Zhu Yunwen is, the descendants of Emperor Chongzhen are no, and the Zhao family of the Song Dynasty is also a side branch, and there is no way to find it.

It depends on which royal family, it seems that the surname Li can be traced back to the Tang Dynasty royal family, and many of the people surnamed Zhu belong to the descendants of Zhu Yuanzhang, of course, those who love Xinjueluo must be the descendants of the Emperor with big braids.

Yes, there are still descendants of King Ning of the Ming Dynasty. It seems that he lives next to the tomb of one of their ancestors, and he is considered a tomb keeper. Even the descendants of the Liao royal family still have it now, and they have changed their surname to Yang.

There must be something for the Manchus. But none of these descendants belong to the orthodox. In fact, there are a lot of them, but most of them don't know it, the country has perished, and the treatment of the royal family of the previous dynasty is definitely not much better, and most of them have been sent on the road for free.

ps: Even Li Zicheng seems to have descendants now.

There are definitely yes, several of China's big surnames Li, Wang, Liu, and Chen have been emperors, and the major surnames can more or less find the source upward, and even if the dynasty is destroyed, the royal family may not all be killed, for example, at the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty, there are more than 40,000 children of the clan on the register, and there are countless others with royal blood who have lost their titles due to various reasons.

There were Manchus named Aixin Jueluo, but most of them changed their surnames to Han during the Cultural Revolution.

Yes, there have always been people in the Aixin Jueluo family.

The royal family refers to a group of families that use imperial power to rule in a monarchy.

Yes, descendants of the Qing Dynasty.

Also, we are the descendants of Yan and Huang.

Yes, the Aixin Jueluo clan association is still alive, and the younger brother of the other Xuantong brother is still alive.

No, Pu Yi has no queen, so there should be no direct lineage.

Of course, there are, especially the royal descendants of the Qing Dynasty, and there are also stars surnamed Aixin Jueluo.

Pu Yi has no children, but the Aixin Jueluo clan still exists, and I heard that many of them live a rich and privileged life.

The Manchus should still have descendants of the Eight Banners.

I think there are some descendants of the royal family.

The orthodox emperor should be gone, but there must be side branches, and there are a lot of them, but due to the problem of the age, many of them have faded, but the Qing Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty should have them, and there must be those who want to love Xinjueluo.

Descendants of the Qing Dynasty royal family are now in Beijing.

Yes, but most of them have already changed their names and surnames.

Yes, the descendants of the royal family are now living an ordinary life like ordinary people.