How to criticize others and think twice?

Correct criticism of others, mainly means not to make personal attacks on others in the pertinence of the problem, these are fine, we just have something to say what is okay. It's usually said to be a matter of facts.

those who appreciate, praise, and encourage him; Then there are those who criticize, accuse and insult him. The former makes people confident, determined, and calm, while the latter makes people wise, profound, and inclusive.

Correct criticism is not scolding, and guidance should be given where it is wrong, not by tone.

That is, if you want to criticize others, you must not criticize too harshly, and then you have to give him a certain amount of encouragement, that is, to believe that he can correct this thing well.

Criticizing others is directly and objectively evaluated, so that others can accept it.

If you want to criticize others correctly, you must first explain the mistakes of others, and then point out according to her mistakes, what should you do? Let's find out if you can accept such a suggestion? Only critics of this program will be accepted by others.

In our daily life, we will always encounter unsatisfactory things that make us unsatisfactory, but when we criticize out of reminders, we will always hurt others, so as to be hated by others, so how can we better criticize others to receive good results?

Method steps.

Criticism should be made when you are alone.

When we are ready to criticize someone, we should find a quiet place instead of criticizing someone individually, instead of criticizing someone in public, which will hurt someone and be hated by someone.

Praise should be given before criticism.

As the saying goes: "If you slap someone and give a date to eat", if we can say some good words and praise before criticizing the other party, it is equivalent to giving a date to eat in advance, I believe that the effect is much better than that of the later.

We want to criticize a certain behavior, not a certain person.

In daily life, when we criticize each other, we always like to criticize each other, which is originally to criticize each other's faults, but in the end it rises to criticize the other person's personality, thus hurting others more deeply. The right thing to do is to criticize the wrong behavior, not the personality.

To give the right thing to do (answer).

After criticizing others, we always don't get up, we are too addicted, and hurt others, so that the other party is like a lost boat at sea does not know how to do it, if we can give the other party advice on the right way to do it at this time, just like pointing them out the way forward, most of them will adopt it, and they will thank you.

It is better to cooperate with them than to order others.

When giving the other person the right thing to do, we should not take the tone of command, but rather take the way of cooperating with the other person to help the other person correct the mistake together. This means that you have saved the other person's life, and the other party will be very grateful to you.

Every time we make a mistake, we have to give the right criticism.

When the other party corrects the mistake this time, it does not mean that it is over, as a good friend and leader of the other party, we should always supervise the other party, of course, not follow the other party every day, but when we find that every time the other party makes a mistake, we should give the other party the right criticism.

Tactfully criticizing others, not in person, and requiring private conversations. When talking in private, bring up what he is not doing well or lacking. The tone of the conversation should be calm, speak from his point of view, and remind him that some things are okay to do once, but not to do them a second time.

It is necessary to pay attention to the principle of criticism of things and not people, and other people's things are not done well and have shortcomings. But when you criticize, you can't criticize other people's personalities, especially not the words "only people like you can do this kind of thing".

People get along with others, it is inevitable that there will be some friction, sometimes others do not do well, we will inevitably criticize others, but criticizing others is a science, sometimes criticism is inappropriate, it is easy to make others hate themselves, hate, cause others to rebel.

Criticism without method is not only ineffective, but even counterproductive, and only by treating criticism as a ladder to solve problems and seek progress can we then seek appropriate and effective methods of criticism.

Try not to criticize your friends or colleagues in crowded or public places, this kind of practice is easy to hurt the self-esteem of others, arouse the disgust of the other party, so that the other party can not get down the steps, that will make him feel very embarrassed, not only can not play the role of education, but also may arouse his rebellious psychology I think there is something.

Try to communicate privately and individually, give the other person a step, and don't embarrass the other person too much. On the one hand, they give each other face, and on the other hand, it is not easy to be hated.

As we all know, criticism is the sharpness that makes people face up to their shortcomings and mistakes in order to keep improving. But we often see that some people's criticisms are unacceptable, even though their criticisms may be right; Some people's criticism makes people feel aggrieved, dissatisfied, and even angry. The purpose of criticism is not achieved, but it stiffens the relationship and alienates the feelings.

No wonder people say, "Good medicine is bitter, but good advice is against the ear!" ”

Can we do it: it is good medicine, not bitter taste; Is it a word of advice, but not against the ear?

In 1831, Goethe, while criticizing Hugo's play Marien Delîme, said: "...In this case, we can only see one merit, that is, the author is very good at depicting details, which is of course an achievement that should not be underestimated. This may seem like a compliment, but it is actually a criticism of Hugo's penchant for putting too much effort into depicting details and not being concise enough.

To criticize others, we must first have sympathy for the person being criticized. Sympathy here does not mean sympathizing with his mistakes, but understanding the reasons for his mistakes and understanding his sadness when he has already made mistakes. Only in this way will we not be nitpicky when we criticize him.

It is only when the person being criticized realizes that you are with him and not against him, that he is likely to accept your criticism.

The critic must fully respect the personality of the person being criticized. Even when a person is criticized for making mistakes, his self-esteem does not disappear, and this often prevents him from accepting criticism. "Why are you so embarrassed to come to see me?

I've never seen a fool like you! Such critical discourse is undesirable precisely because it only stabs the other person and makes it unbearable. In contrast, "How can you be so frustrated?"

I'm sure you've regretted it. Such words can make the person being criticized feel that you are not imposing your critical opinion on him, and that he corrects his mistakes not because of your criticism, but because of his self-knowledge.

Criticize anyone and keep it short. It's best to get the other person to understand in a sentence or two, and then move on to another topic very naturally. Don't repeat the same criticism many times or mention his mistakes after a while, as this can easily make people feel that you are holding on to his shortcomings and mistakes, which is most likely to put the other person in a difficult situation and resist them.

Some criticisms often have unexpected effects: "Do you think that changing your learning methods will make learning better?" —This is inquisitive criticism; "Being organized in your own living environment can have a good impact on a person's mood.

Is that right? —This is implicit criticism. "Actually, the idea of your essay is quite good, but it is a little messy and a little problematic in structure.

- This is consolation criticism.

In short, as long as you are full of kindness to the person being criticized, and as long as you carefully choose the appropriate way of criticism, criticism may produce the desired effect.

A slap pasted over and said: Don't be obsessed with brother, brother is just a legend

First of all, there is not much thought about the key work and central work of the town, there is a lack of communication with the team members, and some ideas in the heart only stay in the brain and are not spoken, let alone put into action, so that the communication with the team is not enough, and some work has caused passivity. For example, it is not good enough to actively collect the opinions and suggestions of the people's congress deputies, especially the members of the presidium, on the key and difficult points of the town, and provide reference for the decision-making of the party committee.

Secondly, I dare not take responsibility, and I dare not touch the hard. The spirit is slack, accustomed to old experience and old methods, the sense of pioneering and enterprising has weakened, the enthusiasm and creativity of taking the initiative to plan the work are lacking, the initiative is not to think, to think of ways and ideas, to report on the work to talk about many problems, and to put forward few countermeasures and suggestions. For example:

There is no determination to check the purity of varieties in the large red area of flue-cured tobacco production this year, and in the work of hanging point villages, the promotion of the tea industry and the response to sudden floods are not effective, and the three bays of human drinking water projects are not asked or tracked, although they have been urged many times, there is still no result.

What are the requirements of criticism.

In criticism and self-criticism, we must persist in seeking truth from facts, stress party spirit rather than personal feelings, stress truth rather than face, persist in "unity, criticism, and unity," and seriously put forward opinions in accordance with the requirements of "looking in the mirror, dressing properly, taking a bath, and curing diseases," and help comrades with enthusiasm; we must never turn self-criticism into self-praise and mutual criticism into mutual praise.

It can be seen that criticism requires at least the following points:

First, seek truth from facts. The problem should come from the reality. We can't make subjective assumptions, let alone make something out of nothing.

The second is seriousness. Mutual criticism is a serious intra-party activity and is not allowed to be treated as child's play.

The third is to help improve the foundation. The original intention and purpose of criticism is to help comrades discover problems, face them squarely, and improve problems.

Fourth, it is not allowed to praise each other. It is necessary to divide the problem and the achievement in two. Put forward opinions, resolutely do not tout in disguise.

For example, there is a classic saying that a subordinate committee member put forward advice to the leader, which is as follows: "Comrade XX's problem is that he does not pay attention to his body, and in order to work overtime every day, he does not eat well and sleep well. The body is the capital of the revolution.

I really don't know how you came up with such an opinion?

I think that if you want to criticize someone in a democratic life meeting, you must first praise someone and praise him for his many merits, and if you can improve this point a little more, it may be better, and this form may not offend people.

When criticizing others in a democratic life meeting, you must pay attention to the wording of the language, so as not to cause unnecessary contradictions, so to speak, I hope that someone will consult with everyone more at work.

If you want to criticize others in a democratic life meeting, then you must first have a good reason to point out the shortcomings of others. And come up with your solution, as well as suggestions for him.

When criticizing others, it is best to give others the opportunity to make corrections, so that others will accept them calmly.

For this kind of formalistic activity, we can only use formalistic criticism, for example, criticizing the leader for not paying too much attention to the body and working too hard. Criticize colleagues for working too seriously, volunteering to work overtime and wasting electricity, etc.

Criticize others realistically, change them if they have them, and encourage them if they don't.

Criticism and self-criticism, I think it is necessary to separate people. If the other person has a good relationship with you, and you can be sure that you are incapable, no matter how vicious it is, as long as you point out his shortcomings, he will not be angry, then you can boldly point out the other person's shortcomings at this time.

But if the other person is a hypocrite, and you know that if you say something that hurts her, she will definitely get angry, then you better just fool around.

The process of criticism and self-criticism is a necessary part of a person's work. One of them first does self-criticism, finds his own problems, and then makes other comments.

Criticism needs to learn to be right about things and not people in principle, and first of all, it is necessary to point out the key, what is the key issue that needs to be changed, and why this issue is the most important. Secondly, pay attention to the details, and it is clear that those areas are doing well and those areas are not satisfactory. Vague and general, you can't, it's wrong to do this, confusing, and beating around the bush will only increase the cost of communication, so it's better to directly ask what the problem is, and the specific fault lies in ** and one of your own attitudes.

Everything must be specific, and this problem is very common in life and in the workplace.

1. Criticize the parties individually. Don't criticize someone in public or when there are many other people, because the original intention of criticizing him may not be effective but will cause him to rebel.

2. Criticism should only be directed at a certain behavior and mistake, not at an individual. When a person makes a mistake, he can criticize, but only to criticize a certain behavior, not to target individuals and other aspects, let alone verbal attacks.

3. After criticism, the corresponding correction methods and answers should be proposed. When criticizing others, we should not blindly emphasize mistakes, but should give corrective methods and suggestions that we think are feasible. Tell the other person why they made the mistake, how to improve it, and how to avoid the same mistake next time, and make it clear that criticism is not a problem, but a way to make them better.

So is it useful to criticize the other side?

John Warnermaker once said, "Thirty years ago, I understood that criticizing others is stupid. ”

In addition to being able to vent your emotions, satisfy your superiority, and warn the other party, criticism probably can't achieve any other effect you want to achieve. Moreover, people who have a bad temper and can't control their emotions will get angry about it, and they may feel uncomfortable for a day after criticism.

When it comes to the people who are being criticized, it basically doesn't work.

Dale Carnegie once said, "Ninety-nine percent of a man who does something wrong, no matter how serious his mistake, does not blame himself." ”

Criticism is often useless, but rather allows the person being criticized to try to justify his mistakes and put himself in a state of self-preservation. If you don't want to communicate well with the other person, the best way to do that is to criticize.

Not only that, criticism can also hurt a person's self-esteem, people with sensitive hearts will deny themselves and slowly become inferior, and some people will even resent the other person or harm themselves.