Hit by how much money did Xiaomi Bu Children s Shoe Store lose in this deal

Lost 50 yuan because the cost is 15 yuan The price is 21 yuan 21-15 = 6 This 6 yuan is the Xiaomi Butong shoe store because it should be earned can not be subtracted, people even spend the cost and contribute (people from a distance wholesale also wasted a lot of energy), If it is your hard-earned 100 yuan was robbed by others, do you say it is a loss or no loss? (If you don't think there's a loss, then give me a month's salary, you won't lose).

Remember.

There are four steps: Step 1: The shopkeeper has shoes 15 yuan Young people hold fake money 50 yuan Neighbors hold real money 50 yuan = real money 21 yuan + real money 29 yuan Step 2:

The shopkeeper has 21 yuan in real banknotes Young people hold shoes 15 yuan + real money 29 yuan (this is the final state of young people, omitted in the future) Neighborhood holds fake banknotes 50 yuan Step 3: The shopkeeper has real banknotes 21 yuan At the same time, the real banknotes are added 50 yuan Neighbors hold fake banknotes 50 yuan Step 4: The shopkeeper has real banknotes 21 yuan Counterfeit banknotes 50 yuan Neighbors hold real banknotes 50 yuan Conclusion:

Comparing the state of the first step and the fourth step of the shopkeeper, we can conclude as follows: Shopkeeper: 21 yuan for genuine banknotes - 15 yuan for shoes - 50 yuan for counterfeit banknotes = -44 yuan That is, the shopkeeper loses 44 yuan.

The crux of the matter is that holding shoes, genuine banknotes, is positive in terms of income, while holding counterfeit banknotes is negative in terms of income.

There are two answers: first, cost loss: 44 yuan.

Second, profit loss: 50 yuan.

Detailed analysis of 44 yuan: before buying shoes, the shoe store owner 0 yuan, got 50 yuan in counterfeit money for the neighbor's real 50 yuan, the boss earned 50 yuan (+50), gave 15 yuan (-15) to a pair of shoes that bought shoes, gave him 29 yuan (-29), was found by the neighbor, gave the neighbor 50 yuan (-50), that is, (+50) + (15) + (29) + (50) = -44 yuan.

Detailed analysis of 50 yuan: first of all, Xiaomi Butong shoes store took 50 yuan counterfeit money to the neighborhood for 50 yuan change, when the neighborhood knew that it was counterfeit money, Xiaomi Butong shoes store lost 50 yuan, so this process can be understood as: Xiaomi Butong shoes store took 50 yuan of real money to the neighborhood to exchange 50 yuan for change, this link Xiaomi Butong shoes store did not lose.

In addition, the transaction between the millet step children's shoe store and the young people, it is also the main link, the young people use 50 yuan counterfeit money (that is, they did not spend a penny) from the millet step children's shoes store to get a pair of shoes with a cost of 15 yuan and the recovered 29 yuan in cash, which is the loss of the millet step children's shoes store, it should be 15 29 44 yuan, if this is the case, the friend on the 6th floor will answer correctly, but is this really the case? No. Because, the Xiaomi Butong shoe store is traded with young people at 21 yuan, so if it is calculated at 15 yuan, the Mi Butong shoe store will lose 6 yuan of profit, therefore, the loss of the Xiaomi Butong shoe store in this transaction should be 15 29 6 50 yuan.

If 50 yuan is not fake money, Xiaomi can earn 21-15 = 6 yuan.

If it is fake money, the net loss is 50-6=44 yuan.

In fact, it is equivalent to Xiaomi using its own real 50 in exchange for 50 change in the neighborhood, this step has no skin pulse loss, and then find a young Ranyuan person 29 yuan is a loss, a pair of shoes is a loss, the cost of 15, a total loss of 44 yuan.

Fake 50 is not worth much, it is counted as 0, so the net loss of silver jujube is 44 yuan, and if 50 is true, it will earn 6 yuan.

Obviously, the so-called satisfactory answer below is wrong.

Xiaomi children's shoes lost 94

50 yuan to return to the neighbor (-50).

Find the vertical change and give the young man the sail beam (-29).

The cost of shoes is more than 15 min

My cousin is like this.

According to the cost, the customer earned 15 yuan for shoes, plus 29 yuan for earnings, which is equal to 44 yuan, which is a loss of 44 yuan.

According to the benefits, I lost 50 yuan of fake money, and the rest did not change.

exchanged 50 yuan with the neighborhood, and later the 50 yuan returned to his hands, and Hungry Li could be regarded as a fake 50 yuan and did not change it, but borrowed 50 yuan from the neighborhood, and finally repaid 50 yuan, so it was 0 yuan.

Sell shoes to earn 21-15 = 6 yuan. Receiving 50 yuan of fake money is equivalent to losing 50 yuan. then 50-6 = 44 yuan.

So this confrontation is easy for the shopkeeper to lose 44 yuan.

The loss of the Mi Bu children's shoe store: the cost of a pair of shoes is 15 yuan, the change is 29 yuan, the change is 50 yuan and the change is 50 yuan. There is no loss.

The cost price of security is a loss of 15 + 29 = 44 yuan, and according to the profit from sales, it is 21 + 29 = 50 yuan.

Big mistake, big mistake.

That's it.

Miscalculated, yes, the customer's counterfeit money is equivalent to a piece of waste paper, so it can be assumed that he did not pay, and we instead found him 29 yuan, and gave him a pair of shoes with a line of 15 yuan, and we gave him 44 yuan for nothing.

And it doesn't matter if the counterfeit money is exchanged or not, anyway, that one is a piece of waste paper. If it is changed to 100 yuan, it has nothing to do with this. Ran Dao said that someone paid 100,000 yuan for this counterfeit currency and gave it to us.

After that, he repented and had to return 100,000 yuan. According to the above algorithm, we are not going to lose 100,000 + 15 + 29 = 100044 yuan. Hundreds of thousands, hehe!

It should be a loss of 29+15=44 yuan.

Suppose Xiaomi originally had 100 yuan, the neighbor had 50 yuan, the young man gave Xiaomi 50 yuan, Xiaomi borrowed 50 yuan from the neighbor, found the young man 29 yuan, Xiaomi also had a sliding cover tremor of 121 yuan, and gave the neighbor 50 yuan, Xiaomi still had 71 yuan, and the loss was 29 yuan, plus the cost of 15 yuan, which is equal to 44 yuan.

I believe that defeat is temporary, I don't know if it's right, you yourself are bored under the research, and you are willing to be jealous for me) Hand fight.

Direct loss: 15 (shoe cost) + 29 (change for the young man who bought the shoe) = 44 yuan.

Indirect losses: The costs in the process of the transaction (such as the time and effort spent exchanging change with the neighbors, the time and energy spent exchanging counterfeit money with the neighbors, the mental loss suffered by the counterfeit money, the subsequent impact of the shopkeeper exchanging the counterfeit money, etc.) can be considered large or small.