If without looking at the price, Xiaomi Mi 2A and Redmi are better than that phone!

Look at the speed of the game to try the card?

2A is better The components used in 2A are all big foreign brands Redmi is obviously a product that compresses costs.

Even a 2A dual-core CPU is enough for PK MTK's quad-core, and the 2A is almost twice the price of Redmi. You get what you pay for.

In terms of cost performance, Redmi is a good deal, and the performance of the 2A will not be much better than that of Redmi, but it is so expensive.

2A is good, just look at the CPU, 2A is Qualcomm, super red rice a few streets!

Now the mobile phone is compared to the speed,Resolution,And the screen display effect,Although the speed of Redmi is quad-core,But it seems to be worse than the dual-core of Xiaomi Mi 2A,Not to mention Xiaomi Mi 2S,Redmi's display effect is said to be worse (I personally think it has no effect)

Xiaomi 2S is positioned as a high-end, processor Qualcomm 600 is stronger than MediaTek, compatibility is better, memory is 2G, and Redmi mobile phone is positioned in the low-end, due to cost constraints, I have to make compromises in details, such as thicker screen bezels, the appearance of the charger is also different from 2S, and the screen and camera are also different specifications from 2S.

In addition, the CPU of Redmi mobile phone is directly provided by MediaTek to provide an integrated solution, which is in place in one step, while the 2S Qualcomm 600 also needs to be matched and optimized, resulting in a gap in debugging costs, so the difference is large.

Hi! Xiaomi mobile phones use the most high-end components of the world's top manufacturers for enthusiasts, and Redmi mobile phones use high-end components from first-class manufacturers for public users, and there are differences in configuration. You can buy it according to your needs.

A more detailed description of the problem will help netizens understand the troubles you are encountering and help you solve the problem more accurately. Thank you for supporting Xiaomi phones!

The most obvious is that the price and configuration are not the same.

To put it simply, in terms of cost performance, Redmi is more cost-effective, but if you compare it comprehensively, it is better than Mi2A, in fact, Mi2A is mainly better than Redmi1, the shell grade is higher than Redmi2, Mi2A's 8960Pro dual-core chipset architecture is more advanced, and the performance is stronger, while Redmi's MTK 6589T chipset is A7 architecture, so even the quad-core performance is not as good as Mi2A3, Mi2A's memory is relatively large, saving you money to buy a memory card. Everything else is pretty much the same. Actually, if you want me to choose, I'll either buy Redmi cheaply or wait for Mi 3, and I'm not going to buy Mi 2A for an NFC.

Agree with the first floor, these two are not the same grade products, Redmi is MediaTek's quad-core, which is not much better than a single core.

The 2A uses Qualcomm's CPU, and the performance is not the same.

Compared to you're stupid... Qualcomm S4 and MTK ??? To put it bluntly, the 4 cores of red rice are a ratio.

Otherwise, it sells so cheaply? The CPU used is the same as those quad-core copycats on the Internet, although it is 4 cores, but it is really bad. Really NB is Qualcomm's S4 Samsung Orion HiSilicon V3K2 MTK doesn't count.

It seems that there is no more, and there are Huawei, ZTE, Coolpad, Lenovo, and the hardware seems to be better than Xiaomi.

The introductions you made to the manufacturer downstairs are useless, they're just gimmicks. You have to believe that you get what you pay for, and you would rather take the low configuration at the same price than the high configuration, especially if you spend so much money on advertising, you can think about its workmanship, how poor the quality is, and the performance is at least 30% false. If you don't play games much, you might as well buy a Sony or Meizu one.

Huawei A199, 4 cores 5 inches 1280*720 screen 2gram 1999 yuan.