Which is better, HiSilicon CPU955 or Qualcomm or Snapdragon 821, do any friends know?

955 synthesis is not as good as 820, CPU single-core performance is weaker than 820, but due to 8 cores, multi-core performance is better than 820, the fatal point is GPU, GPU is far weaker than 820 GPU, and 821 is the high-frequency version of 820, it is conceivable that 955 comprehensive is not as good as 821.

The gap between the HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 821: The performance is different, the running score is different.

First, the performance is different:

The HiSilicon Kirin 960 has 8 cores, of which four large cores are A73 architecture, which is also the first time that a commercial processor has used the latest A73 architecture, and the four small cores are still A53 architecture.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 is a SoC that is more used in mainstream flagship mobile phones, using a four-core independent KRYO architecture, large core, small core, GPU uses Adreno 530, and the frequency has reached 653MHz.

Second, the running score is different:

The two mobile phones selected for the benchmark comparison are almost identical in terms of configuration, one is the Snapdragon 820 processor 6GB RAM+64GB ROM, and the other is the Snapdragon 821 processor 6GB RAM+64GB ROM, so the test results are still relatively representative.

Antutu test data shows that the total score of the Snapdragon 821 mobile phone is 163546, while the total score of the Snapdragon 820 mobile phone is 142114, and the performance is indeed stronger than the Snapdragon 821. In terms of comparison of individual links, Snapdragon 821 has almost achieved comprehensive suppression, especially in terms of CPU, image computing and 3D performance, Snapdragon 821 has obvious advantages.

Parameter configuration. The Snapdragon 821 processor has a built-in four-chip Kyro quad-core architecture, with two high-frequency cores at the highest frequency, two low-frequency cores at the highest frequency, and a GPU frequency of 650MHz. As a comparison, the Snapdragon 820 of the previous work, the main frequency of the two high-frequency cores is, the main frequency of the low-frequency core is 624MHz.

In other aspects, the Snapdragon 821 and 820 are the same, both are equipped with X12 LTE modem baseband, support, up to 600Mbps downlink high-speed network, upload up to 150Mbps, carrier aggregation support downlink 3*20MHz, uplink 2*20MHz.

821 seconds garbage Kirin ten streets.

Daily Huawei, 821 look at manufacturer optimization....The game seconds 955 a round trip.

Compared with the HiSilicon Kirin 925 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 801, the HiSilicon 925 has better performance, and the following is a comparison of the configuration parameters of the two CPUs:

Number of cores: HiSilicon Kirin 925 is 8 cores, Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 is 4 cores.

Core architecture: The HiSilicon Kirin 925 is a quad-core Cortex-A15 plus quad-core A7, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 is a KRAIT400 architecture.

Memory bandwidth: HiSilicon Kirin 925, Qualcomm Snapdragon 801.

Integrated GPU: Mali624MP4 for HiSilicon Kirin 925 and Adreno330 for Qualcomm Snapdragon 801.

Main frequency: HiSilicon Kirin 925 is 4-core core, Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 is 4-core.

HiSilicon is an octa-core, four-core operation, and 801 is quad-core, but in terms of normal operation, the 801 quad-core is significantly better than the HiSilicon 925, even if the 925 has a high running score.

Snapdragon 810 heavy performance, Kirin 935 low power consumption and low heat, each has its own strengths, that's all.

HiSilicon Kirin 935 is inferior to Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 in terms of CPU performance and GPU performance, especially GPU, which is even more scum, even Snapdragon 800's Adreno 330 is inferior.