What do you think about the arms race of the Cold War dragging down the Soviet economy?

You will find that the arms race of the Cold War brought down the Soviet economy, and I think that statement makes sense, because you have to know. The United States and the Soviet Union were both market superpowers at that time, and in order to compete for world hegemony, both sides tried to avoid large-scale wars around the world, and you have to find that the two of them did not dare to easily use force to solve each other's problems, but they both had to store a large number of nuclear ** to ensure that each other could destroy each other. Because of this, the Soviet economy was more prepared for the military armaments, so I think that the arms race dragged down the Soviet economy in part.

It cannot be completely said that the Soviet Union was dragged down by both construction during the Cold War, because the Soviet Union itself had great problems during that period, and the rigid system became more and more obvious in the later development, because too many social benefits were formulated in the past, and a large amount of economic expenditure, coupled with the later manipulation of oil by the United States to further destroy and suppress the internal economy of the Soviet Union, for various reasons, the Soviet Union was directly collapsed in the later arms race and had to disintegrate.

This is a very despicable, but very successful strategy of the US military. The U.S. military appears to be more scientific than the Soviet Union in the use of military spending. The Soviet Union, on the other hand, has always produced military products, but it could not participate in the war.

It's a very serious drag on their economy. And then they themselves dragged down their own economy.

I think there is an arms race, but the fundamental reason why the Soviet Union was dragged down in essence is not this, this can only be regarded as the last straw, because during the period when Gorbachev was in power, you carried out a lot of social changes, and these social changes became the most direct reason for the collapse of the Soviet Union, because judging from the policies of your predecessors at that time, no matter what kind of reforms were made at this time, the national economy could not be recovered.

The USSR was essentially a military empire, not a modern state. Excessive attention is paid to the development of heavy industry and neglect of light industry. Light industry is the basis for ensuring the national economy and people's livelihood and economic development, and is one of the most important factors in determining the strength of a country's economy.

And the USSR was a lame giant. The excessive development of heavy industry and the neglect of light industry have seriously affected the quality of life of the Soviet people.

First of all, I think that the Soviet Union was originally a socialist country, and its military needs were not as high as those of other capitalism, so it would have higher requirements for the people's livelihood security, so I think that the Soviet economy must have been dragged down in the Cold War arms race because of their improvement in the treatment of weapons.

I think this is a very successful strategy of the US military. In fact, at the very beginning, the Soviet Union was not as strong as the United States in all aspects. Therefore, the United States used the strategy of arms race to make the huge military spending of the Soviet Union become unprofitable in non-war periods, and then dragged down the entire Soviet economy.

Looking back at the history of the end of the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union dragged down the Soviet Union in the Cold War for several reasons: 1Sino-US Joint 2The U.S. pushed down oil prices by 3

The Soviet Union was caught up in Afghanistan, and I am mainly talking about the arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union, the economic strength of the Soviet Union was inferior to that of the United States, and the huge military expenditure of the Soviet Union had no economic benefits during the non-war period, which dragged down the Soviet economy.

While the Cold War was marked by the U.S. power from start to finish, even Usain Bolt had to run to the point of near-cramping to exhaust (not just win) an Olympic opponent. The Soviet Union was not killed by the United States with economic warfare, but was the inevitable result of the inefficiency of its own political system. The strongest socialist country in the world, the one that has not changed color is North Korea.

March 5, 1946, former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill.

In the United States, Fulton delivered the "Iron Curtain Speech," which officially opened the prelude to the Cold War. March 12, 1947, Truman Doctrine.

The coming to power in the United States marked the beginning of the Cold War. The establishment of the Warsaw Pact in 1955 marked the formation of a bipolar pattern.

The arms race only began in the 70s of the last century, and in the 70s, the United States and the Soviet Union were in a nuclear position.

Fierce competition. By the end of 1987, the United States had 10,000 nuclear warheads.

**Total equivalent of 100 million tonnes of TNT; The USSR had 10,000 nuclear warheads with a total yield of 100 million tons of TNT. Space technology has been closely linked to the military from the very beginning, and the development of science and technology in the 80s led to the shift of the arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union to space and other high-tech fields.

The first is the market economy system under the liberal international order dominated by the United States, and the second is the highly centralized political and economic system, and the economic development of the Soviet Union is seriously unbalanced. It only focuses on heavy industry, a large amount of national income is spent on national defense construction, and national consumption and productive investment are seriously insufficient. Economic development was hampered by the drawbacks of the highly centralized political or sail economic system of the Soviet Union, and the proportion of the national economy was unbalanced.

The overemphasis on the hegemony of the world made the Soviet Union despise the resolution of domestic contradictions, which led to the intensification of domestic contradictions and the outbreak of armed conflicts in some places. Since the mid-70s of the 20th century, the pace of development of the national economy of the USSR has significantly decreased and has come to a standstill. Gross national product of the USSR in 1987.

Falling behind Japan, the gap with the United States has actually widened.

The surging military spending seriously overdrew the national strength of the Soviet Union, and the economic situation in the Soviet Union began to deteriorate from the mid-to-late 70s of the last century. But in order to win this superpower.

In the struggle for hegemony, the Soviet top leadership did not reduce the military investment and <>

The fact that the Soviet Union, in the face of serious political and economic problems, was still engaged in a special arms race, which undoubtedly became the last straw that broke the camel's back. Therefore, whether or not the Soviet Union engaged in an arms race with the United States, the final result would be a failure.

The reason why the Soviet Union lost this game was mainly because their national strength could not support it, and the main reason was that there was a huge gap between the two sides. You must know that when the Soviet Union was not yet founded, Liang Luo's American brother at that time had been founded for more than 100 years, and a series of industrial developments and technological innovations in the tibia had made their economy reach the first level in the world.

During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union made very big changes in their strategic materials and military adjustments, and formulated corresponding strategic guidelines. The end result was that at the end of the Cold War, the United States and Western European countries launched a large-scale war against the Soviet Union, which eventually led to the Soviet Union being severely damaged.

In the 70s, Nixon launched an arms race, and the end result was that the Soviet Union was affected by the race, which led to the complete collapse of the Soviet Union.

During the Cold War, in addition to the military, the United States was extremely developed economically, politically, and culturally, and the United States established a complete industrial system. The U.S. military is built on the U.S. economy, science and technology. In the arms race with the USSR, economic developments were not neglected.

And the USSR was the opposite.

The main reason is that the United States has always been grasping with both hands, and it has always been engaged in strategic plundering in the economic aspect, so it has not been dragged down.

The main reason is that the economy of the United States and Liang is relatively special, and the hail will not affect the overall economic development with the cold war, and their scientific and technological capabilities have always been very strong, leading the world.

Because at that time, the economy of the United States was also very high, and the development of the United States at that time was also very good.

During the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, although the Soviet Union had more than twice the land area of the United States, its gross national product was only 1 10 of the United States. Another difference is that the United States makes money on its strong industrial production capacity. The USSR made money mainly from energy, that is, mainly from the export of oil, but oil ** was in the hands of European and American countries.

They set up OPEC to lower the oil market by adjusting oil production**. In this way, the money earned by the USSR was in the hands of the Westerners, led by the United States. In this way, the USSR suffered huge losses.

In order to bring down the USSR economically, the United States adopted a Cold War policy, that is, to compete with the USSR in military development. We all know that military development is the most expensive. In order to compete with the United States, the USSR also went hand in hand with the United States.

The U.S. military investment accounted for about 3% of its GDP, but the Soviet Union also accounted for 30% of its GDP, and in order to compete with the United States, the Soviet Union invested most of its limited funds in heavy industry and limited investment in agriculture and light agriculture, which also led to a very uneven economic development in the Soviet Union. Their heavy industry is well developed, while agriculture and other industries are very backward and <>

As far as the Soviet Union was concerned, it was a violation of the laws of the economy and the forcible development of a military industry. At the same time, the Soviet Union was a technologically backward party. His ** equipment is useless for civilians, and the technology is not common to both military and civilians.

So the USSR could produce first-class tanks, but not first-class trucks. In order to catch up with the gap with the United States, its own efficiency is relatively low, and it can only use several times the scale of the United States to invest, including manpower, material and financial resources.

The industry of the USSR was crippled. Unable to create a virtuous circle for the national life and the combined strength of the country, this industry can only sacrifice the overall well-being of the Soviet people and the agricultural subsidies of the USSR unconditionally and indefinitely. The more developed the industry of this model, the more serious the damage to its own economy and agriculture.

But the United States has handled this very well. First of all, it has a very good economic base. At the same time, the post-war military industrial system of the United States also entered the civilian field, improving the social life and social system of the United States, and enabling the people to realize the development and well-being of science and technology.

This is the whole reason for the collapse of the USSR.

First, the struggle for hegemony between the United States and the Soviet Union is actually a competition in the economic model. The Soviet model denied the role of the law of value and the market mechanism, managed the economy by executive order and even by violent means, and subjected all economic activity to a directive plan. With the development of heavy industry as the core, we should use the means of depriving the peasants and restricting the improvement of the living standards of the residents to achieve the goal of high accumulation and more investment.

The defeat of the Soviet Union was, first of all, the failure of the economy of the planned economy. Second, the struggle for hegemony between the United States and the Soviet Union triggered a new technological revolution in the United States. Microsoft's Bill Gates and Apple's Steve Jobs used the computing technology incubated during the Apollo era to create miracles.

3. After World War II, the United States became the formulator of international finance and international rules by virtue of its strong strength. The United States established two major international financial institutions, the International Monetary Organization and the World Bank, which ultimately established the hegemony of the dollar.

It is a virtuous circle that the military products of the United States can be sold for their own use in addition to their own use, and the military products of the Soviet Union are all for their own use.

It is because the economic strength of the United States has always been relatively strong, and the country's savings are particularly large, so they can hold on well at all times.

Because during World War II, the U.S. economy was relatively sufficient, so it was difficult to bring them down.

It doesn't have much of an impact. Ordinary people still do their own thing. It feels like a cold war thing.

People are happier and have a sense of superiority. You can ask the people who have lived in this matter. I don't want the gap between the rich and the poor to be so big now...

There was still a lot of satisfaction and pride at that time.

There are more and more atomic bombs. It will ruin the world later.

The important military manifestations of the Cold War in the United States are as follows:

The United States is building an integrated, refined, and adaptable force based on the concept of system integration starting from the top-level design. The U.S. demands of this force that it can fight any adversary on a global scale in all circumstances; It must have five characteristics: a flexible operational doctrine, a strong strategic mobility capability, a modular organization that is easy to combine, the ability to effectively conduct joint operations and multinational force alliance operations, and the ability to conduct a wide range of military operations, including war and non-war operations.

Maintaining and expanding the security environment that has been extremely favorable to the United States since the end of the Cold War, with NATO's eastward expansion as the main symbol, proposes to "maintain stability in key regions of the world and prevent them from being controlled by hostile forces; Maintain the prosperity of the global economy and freedom**; promoting democracy and human rights; tightly control the proliferation of nuclear, biological, chemical and other potentially destructive technologies; Strengthen the leading role of the United States in the international community, cooperate with allies around the world, and play a guiding role in countries that may affect US interests.

Without warning, the U.S. military can carry out preemptive strikes against terrorist organizations and countries that support terrorism at any time and in any place that pose a threat, and even use nuclear ** if necessary.

The measures taken by the USSR were as follows:

The Soviet Union initially established a triad of strategic nuclear forces, and the supreme leadership of the Soviet armed forces was the CPSU**, the Supreme Soviet and the Council of Ministers. The National Defense Council is the highest decision-making body in peacetime and the highest military leadership organ in wartime. The Ministry of National Defense is the leading organ of the armed forces, the General Staff Headquarters is the main command organ, and the General Political Department is the leading organ of the Party in the armed forces.

The Soviet Union's military policy has been greatly readjusted, and the building of military strength has been strengthened in an all-round way, with emphasis on expanding its strategic nuclear arsenal in an attempt to achieve a nuclear balance with the United States; since then, the Soviet Union has entered a period of large-scale production and deployment of nuclear weapons, and the rapid growth of defense spending from 1964 to 1972 has fully reflected the Soviet Union's psychology of not sparing a huge price in order to achieve a status of parity with the United States.

There were two important breakthroughs in the development of the Soviet strategic nuclear forces: First, the accuracy of the Soviet Union's land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles had been markedly improved; second, the technology of split-guided multiple warheads, which was decided to be developed in the late 60s, was successfully developed during this period.