What kind of acting do you think can be called good acting for an actor?

I think for actors, they think that they should take the initiative to try anything. And be dedicated and responsible. You can live yourself in the script. Such an actor is acting.

When people watch a movie, what they really see is the character, not who is playing him, which is called vivid.

I think that for actors, performances that are not superficial and superficial, not exaggerated, pretentious, and have a play in their eyes that can resonate with people can be called good acting skills.

This has to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. For an actor, it is natural that he can come to life when he plays the role he plays.

When an actor acts, the best state is that his eyes can act, and his eyes are all plays, and whether an actor's acting is empty depends on whether the expression of his eyes is in place.

In my opinion, for an actor, the kind of acting that can be retracted freely and can fit the setting of that role is considered real acting.

I think at the very least, you should be able to use the original voice (except for the role or other reasons).

It's the kind of performance that can be fake, and I don't think so, but I can perform that very unique feeling.

To show the character's character, different scenes have different performances, completely shape a person, and convey what the character wants to express.

For actors, what kind of performance can be called good acting skills, it should only be those who have a lot of acting experience, and such people are also very good.

If you want to correctly evaluate an actor's acting skills, then see this play, or the performance in several plays, as well as the performance of the characters in the play, as well as your own own performance, as well as your own style and performance.

First of all, the most basic thing is that the actor should convince the audience that everything that the character has experienced is real, and the audience can feel the corresponding information and emotions through the actor's performance, which is a good performance: "He is really unemployed", "He is really in pain". But more important is the heart of the character, and the authenticity of the performance can only be achieved by exploring the heart of the character.

Every time a character is performed, the actor has to live in that role. If an actor makes us feel like he's just acting, obviously he's not a good actor. The performances of excellent actors are always natural and sincere, and it is this sense of realism that sticks to the heart that makes their performances always bring.

Surprise the audience.

In the movie "Breakup Master".

, Master Tang's bodyguard Lao Liu and breakup master Mei Yuangui have a fight in an old workshop. Mei Yuangui preemptively kicked in the air, but was knocked to the ground by the sixth man with one hand. The sixth child picked up Mei Yuangui and kicked it a few meters away.

The sixth ignored Mei Yuangui and walked towards Ye Xiaochun, Mei Yuangui pounced from the back, and the sixth threw Mei Yuangui back to the ground again. The actor Xu Jia's movements were clean and neat, full of strength, and his fists were to the flesh, making the audience feel how painful Mei Yuangui's injuries were at this time. And the look and aura shown by actor Xu Jia in this scene are similar to the sixth child when he was ridiculed by Mei Yuangui, and the audience feels the identity of the sixth bodyguard and the disparity in strength between the two.

In the movie "The Breakup Master", Master Tang's bodyguard Lao Liu and the breakup master Mei Yuangui have a fight in an old workshop. Mei Yuangui preemptively kicked in the air, but was knocked to the ground by the sixth man with one hand. The sixth child picked up Mei Yuangui and kicked it a few meters away.

The sixth ignored Mei Yuangui and walked towards Ye Xiaochun, Mei Yuangui pounced from the back, and the sixth threw Mei Yuangui back to the ground again. The actor Xu Jia's movements were clean and neat, full of strength, and his fists were to the flesh, making the audience feel how painful Mei Yuangui's injuries were at this time. And the look and aura shown by actor Xu Jia in this scene are similar to the sixth child when he was ridiculed by Mei Yuangui, and the audience feels the identity of the sixth bodyguard and the disparity in strength between the two.

TV series "Seven Heroes and Five Righteous Ways in the World".

Lu Tianliang in , this character's speech and demeanor are not common sense simply looking at it, and there is a line in the play: "You know where you are."

How did he die? Explains the character traits of this character: reckless, self-explanatory, fierce and chivalrous. Actor Xu Jia accurately grasped the characteristics of this role, and grasped Lu Tianliang's speech and demeanor just right, which is in line with the character's personality.

It also makes the audience feel reasonable.

Laugh when you're happy and cry when you're sad, that's what you should do. However, these are a kind of "choice" for actors, who can not laugh or cry, and laughing and crying can also be reflected in many ways. A performance with natural expressions and sincere emotions is good, but that is just the basic requirement for actors, and the real test of acting skills is how to make reasonable and refreshing choices under the same plot.

The way the actor performs depends on the character of the character and the development of the plot. An excellent.

There are many aspects to consider when evaluating an actor's acting skills, and here are some possible evaluation criteria:

Emotional expression ability: whether the actor can truly convey the emotions of the character and make the audience empathize.

Oral expression ability: whether the actor can realistically present the character's voice, intonation, speed of speech and other oral expression skills.

Physical Expression: Whether the actor can convey the character's state, emotion, intentions, and other information through their body language.

Character shaping ability: whether the actor can portray the character image realistically, completely, and deeply.

Ability to cooperate in stills: whether the actor can cooperate with other actors or crews to present a smooth performance.

Visual effects: Whether the actor can make the character more vivid and three-dimensional through expressions, personality, and dress.

When evaluating an actor's performance, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive analysis and consideration from the above dimensions, so as to arrive at an accurate evaluation. At the same time, it is also necessary to take into account the influence of factors such as audience groups and viewing time and occasions.

An actor's acting skills should be comprehensively evaluated from his capture of the character's personality, eyes, expressions, movements, emotional substitution, lines and other aspects. It also depends on whether his rivalry with his partner is natural.

is a real actor with good acting skills, a line, and a look can make the audience enter the plot.

To evaluate an actor's acting skills, we must first look at the actor's character, which is relatively good, and secondly, whether the acting skills are attentive, whether they study seriously, and whether they are willing to devote themselves to a certain role, which is a fundamental requirement for judging an actor's acting skills.

The so-called acting skills refer to the skills of acting. The so-called performance has two meanings, one is the public level, performance is to conceal, process or distort a certain reality through some techniques;

The second is artistic, where performance is the use of professional skills to interpret events, stories, imagery, and specific works of art.

No matter what level it is, acting requires some skills, in simple terms, sound, form, emotion, and meaning. Referring to these kung fu exams in the admissions of film schools: recitation, vocal music, body and performance, it can be seen that what kind of inner qualities do you care about in cultivating an actor.

Sound. An important part of an actor's performance is reading his lines. Therefore, the skill of reading lines can be regarded as an important parameter for the actor's acting skills.

Whether or not you have received special line training can be seen as a sign of whether you are from a professional class, because this is a very important course in a professional college.

Among domestic actors, there are more obvious lines with good skills, such as Wang Zhiwen. You can easily compare the differences from the actors playing against him. To evaluate an actor's acting skills, you can start with the lines, because this is the basic skill.

The actors who can't read the lines well are basically three-legged cats and halfway monks.

In addition, it should be noted that many singers also like to sing and perform well, because they have received similar vocal training and feel that it is not difficult to read lines. It may be better to pass the lines, but the problem is that acting is not as simple as reciting the lines.

Shape. We know that less than half of what people say when they convey information, and their bodies also account for a large proportion. Performing pantomime is also a traditional training and examination subject in the Department of Acting.

Back in the days of silent films, there was no dialogue, and physical performance and expression were almost everything. To this day, physical performance is still an intermediate to advanced performance technique. It's not uncommon to see reports of a film director leading the film's main cast on an experience, or an actor training for months to play a role.

There are several aspects to consider when evaluating an actor's acting skills:

Character restoration: Whether the actor can truly restore the character's inner feelings, words and deeds when playing the role, so that the audience can resonate.

Acting skills: Whether the actor is able to use various acting techniques, such as body language, facial expressions, etc., to convey the character's emotions and allow the audience to understand the character more deeply.

The actor's shaping ability: whether the actor can shape the role more vividly and three-dimensionally through the delicate depiction of the heart and the in-depth understanding of the character's background when playing the role.

The ability of emotional resonance: whether the actor can make the audience have emotional resonance and deep psychological resonance through the grasp of emotions and the portrayal of the character's personality.

In short, the evaluation criteria for the quality of an actor are multifaceted, and they need to be considered from multiple perspectives such as acting skills, shaping ability, and emotional resonance. At the same time, it is also necessary to consider the impact of factors such as the complexity of the role, the quality of the script, and the director's guidance on the performance of the actors.

The best criterion for evaluating an actor is whether he really acts with his heart. The actor should convince the audience that everything the character has experienced is real, and the audience can feel the corresponding information and emotions through the actor's performance, so that the audience can enter the play, which is a good performance.

Because of a charming film and television work, no matter who plays this role, they will be able to get the greatest display of acting skills from the overall quality of the movie, but if the actor is closer to this role in terms of personality or performance expertise, I believe that this role can also achieve the perfect release of the role through the actor's interpretation, and truly make the stuffy artistic appeal deeply rooted in the hearts of the people!

More precisely, it should be that the actor and the role complement each other, if an actor has not met a suitable role for her in his life, then the actor is an incompetent actor first, and the second is too unlucky, not reaching a divine favor, allowing himself to succeed by playing a role that suits him.

If we observe carefully, we will find that many actors will rely on a role to eat a lifetime of old books, because they are really familiar with this role, maybe they are the realistic version of this role, their own temperament and character is the perfect interpretation of this role, they will also be familiar with it when they play a role that fits their own personality, it can be said that as long as they follow the script a little, they can create a good role, this kind of role is an actor, can be met in a lifetime, if her acting skills are enough to support his character building, I believe that these successful actors do not need to be in a hurry to find those roles that are very suitable for them in personality, they can create the roles they want through their acting skills, but this kind of role is also a great test of the actor's acting skills, and it is not as smooth as the role that conforms to the actor's own temperament.

The actor's brilliance is not only because of a good script, but also because of his own life experience to create the role he understands, which is known to the public, resonates with him, and sublimates the role.

When I first started watching the old Sherlock Holmes detective books, I felt that this person was simply out of the book, his performance was just right, the rational analysis performance did not make people feel divine, he was a genius, not a simple addict or a sadist, energetic and obsessed with solving complex cases.

I believe that there are many actors in front of him and behind him who can do this or even better than him, and the one who is close to Watson's pen is a little cold-blooded, ignorant in some aspects, and an absolute expert in the detective area.

Until I saw the scene of the Red Circle, the lover walked into the prison car, as one of the law enforcers, he chose the law, but after witnessing this scene, I don't know if it was originally in the script, I prefer to believe that the person in the film is him in reality, seeing the life and recalling the death of his deceased wife, this Sherlock Holmes burst into tears and chose to say goodbye.