How did the harm of good guy doctrine come about?

The main reason for the harm of good people is that many people want to be good people and don't want to offend other people. Then there will be a lot of things in the process of signing each other, or in the process of passing the buck to each other, and that will not be able to do things well, so this is the principle of good people. Fountainhead.

How is the harm of good guy manifested? This means that people are too good, others are easy to bully you, and when a good person is oppressed, he will become a harmful person to a certain extent.

How did the idea of good guy come about? That is to say, the good man, the good man, this sentence should be this from this sentence, the main thing is that this person has no bottom line in doing things, blindly agrees with others in everything, and then promises others that even if they suffer losses, they must say to help others do things.

How did the harm of good guy doctrine come about?It must be some cult elements who bewitch the elderly and children at a very young age, and then carry out harm to this society.

Good guy doctrine means that good people are used to being bullied, and if they are suppressed for too long, they may explode and become a bad person.

How did the harm of good guy doctrine come about?Well, that's how an adult kicks out a good person, well, the idea is that he sees you very well, so he kicks you out.

The doctrine of good people has existed for a long time, and everyone is a good person, and they are all good people at work, which is very harmful to the whole work, including construction.

The harm of good man doctrine means that some people don't have a good grasp of their own lives without making money, and they are going to be called good people with others.

The harm of good people can come out a lotWell, good people are a lifetime of peace and happiness, but there must be feelings.

The doctrine of good people is what Confucius said, the hometown wishes, and the thief of virtue is also. Unprincipled harmony seems to be a harmonious mess, but the inability to distinguish between good and evil and right and wrong will only make the bad people more rampant and the good people more guilty.

Good humanism is the spirit of always doing good deeds for others and being selfless.

I think we must be a good person, this is one thing that everyone must do, the most basic.

How did this come out now, if you are a good person? You may still be abnormal, and then you will let the family help you with all the poop.

If you want to explore this theory, you can make a study based on one of its books, and you can come up with its specifics. What does it mean to harm people at will?

How the harm of good man doctrine is raised, this is what the state is proposing.

Writing ideas: The harm of good humanism, that is, the harm caused by good humanism, can be illustrated as an example, for example, many cadres make mistakes, and the beginning is often just a small gap, if someone bites their ears in time, pulls their sleeves, reminds and corrects early, they may not go further and further, and slide into the abyss of mistakes or even crimes, etc.

Text: The doctrine of being a good person seems to be "good" to people, but it is actually irresponsible to comrades. People are not sages, who can do nothing, inevitably have shortcomings, make mistakes, need to often pick up criticism and self-criticism**, "look in the mirror, dress properly, take a bath, and heal".

Many cadres make mistakes, and the beginning is often only a small gap, and if someone bites their ears and pulls their sleeves in time to give early warnings and corrections, they may not go further and further and slide into the abyss of mistakes or even crimes.

What's more, some people look like "good people", but in fact they are two-faced people, who don't say anything to their faces, talk nonsense behind their backs, raise their hands at the meeting, shake their hands down, make promises to their faces, turn around and dig holes and traps, how can they look like "good people"?

Humanism is about making oneself good by pleasing others. Needless to say, the reason why the doctrine of good people prevails is that many "good people" have benefited from it, and they have imitated and followed the trend, so that "unspoken rules" have become a common practice. If the selection of cadres is simply based on votes, under the baton of "vote-only," cadres will inevitably pull ties, worship people, and compete for votes.

Those who follow it have benefited, and those who speak principles and dare to criticize are not only not encouraged and praised as they should be, but are even regarded as outliers. The result of this kind of "bad money driving out good money" and "reverse elimination" can only be that there are more and more relations and fewer and fewer people who stress principles.

The most important thing is to adhere to the correct orientation of employing people. Only by making those who tell the truth and are able to do things be put to good use, by letting those who do not do things and who are superficial have no place, by not allowing those who dare to uphold principles to suffer, and by not allowing "good old people" to take advantage, can we completely lose the market of the doctrine of being a good man and truly reverse the unhealthy tendencies.

You have to write about the good of good people first, and then you have to write about the good harms. And to illustrate with examples. In this way, through a comparative discourse, the topic of the essay can be argued.

The specific manifestations of the good guy doctrine are as follows:1: Everything is wise to protect oneself, nothing to do with oneself, hang high, have the intention to "plant flowers", unintentionally "plant thorns", know that it is wrong, it is better to say less, engage in "hello, I am good, everyone is good", unprincipled, bottom-line "and mud";

2: Lack of assertiveness at work, willing to be a "setter", follow the crowd, never take the lead in expressing a position, even if you make a statement, you have to look left and right to see what colleagues say, typical "wall grass, both sides down";

3: Afraid of affecting popularity and losing votes, greet each other with a smile, hold up and down, and no one can be offended, so that "superiors to subordinates, coax and protect; Subordinates to superiors, holding and carrying; The same level to the same level, wrapping and letting".

The doctrine of being a good man is a vulgar style of stressing personal feelings rather than party spirit and relationships rather than principles, and its harm to the party's cause should not be underestimated. Criticism and self-criticism are effective ways for the Communist Party to uphold the truth, correct mistakes, and always maintain its advanced nature, and are also an important embodiment of Party members' adherence to the principles of Party spirit. The doctrine of being a good person, proceeding from the vulgar theory of relations, covering up the truth, avoiding contradictions, abandoning criticism, and abolishing active ideological struggles are manifestations of the abnormality of party life.

The prevalence of the doctrine of being a good man has actually played a role in shielding and conniving at erroneous thoughts, words and deeds within the party, and will inevitably greatly weaken or even lose the ability of the party organizations to resolve their own contradictions and promote unity and progress. The doctrine of being a good man is an "anesthetic" and a "soft knife" that stifles the revolutionary will of the communists, erodes the physical health of the party, and ultimately weakens the party's fighting capacity and the foundation of its ruling power.

Practical essence. The concrete manifestation of the doctrine of being a good person seems to be "good" to people, but in fact it is irresponsible to comrades. People are not saints and sages, who can do nothing, and it is inevitable that there will be shortcomings and mistakes. At present, in particular, China is in a critical period of building a moderately prosperous society in an all-round way, various deep-seated contradictions are becoming increasingly prominent, various ideologies and cultures are agitating each other, and some negative things can easily invade the party and corrupt comrades.

This requires us to constantly pick up criticism and self-criticism to "resist the erosion of all kinds of political dust and political microorganisms". When comrades are found to have shortcomings or mistakes, they should promptly point them out and help them correct them. "Small holes are not filled, big holes suffer".

When many cadres make mistakes, there is always a process of changing from quantity to quality, and there is often only a gap at the beginning. At such a time, a criticism is like an initiation, and when the head is drunk, the cadres will be alert and will not go further and further and slide into the abyss of mistakes or even crimes.

The specific manifestation of the doctrine of being a good person is intended to please and be good, but in the end it is not beneficial to oneself. The doctrine of good people pursues the philosophy of self-preservation. Such a person may have "good popularity" and may also get certain "benefits".

However, we must understand that what is needed for the cause is cadres who are upright and upright, and only such comrades can stand the test of practice and win the heartfelt support of the masses of the people. And those "good gentlemen" who plan for themselves first, look ahead and look backwards, and suffer from gains and losses, have lost their own prestige while losing the principles of party spirit. Moreover, it is often difficult for such cadres to concentrate their minds on work and study, which will affect the improvement of their own quality and ability, and in the end it will inevitably be difficult to adapt to the requirements of the new situation and new tasks and to shoulder heavy responsibilities.

Those who are "good people" tolerate and connive at erroneous ideas and behaviors, and use "harmony and mud" to maintain so-called unity, and do not stress principled relations, safety, and harmony, resulting in unimpeded violations of rules and discipline. "Good manism" seems to be "good" to people, but in fact it is irresponsible to comrades, and in the long run, it will only make the parties farther and farther away from safety, and eventually slide into an irreparable abyss; It will only allow the potential safety hazards to accumulate more and more, and eventually lead to irreversible consequences.