In order to better adapt to the needs of society, how should young people choose between generalists

Now the society is a high-speed development society, is a large integration of society, a lot of work needs a compound knowledge talent. Therefore, at this time, young people will be very hesitant to choose between specialists and generalists, and they don't know which one to choose. Actually, for me, I think young people should focus more on professionals.

In many cases, many jobs require us to master a certain skillFor example, if I am majoring in accounting, then my future job will be in the field of accounting, accounting, finance, etc. For this kind of job, we only need to master the skills that are suitable for this kind of job, and we do not need to mix with other functions or learn too much other professional knowledge. <>

On the other hand, a person's learning ability is limited, and a person's mastery of knowledge and skills is also limited, first of all, we must master the skills on the one hand, and we must learn deeply in one aspect, so that we will be more competitive. It's not that we have learned a lot of knowledge, and if we can't master any of them well, then this will not help us in the future. Only when we have a very professional knowledge and skills, so that we can work better, can we make some achievements in our work, and make ourselves have a rapid improvement and development.

However, as an individual, we should also dabble in other knowledge, and if we reach a certain stage of professional development, then we may no longer focus on our own work, but on other jobs. For example, when we go to a management position in a company, we may learn some management knowledge at this time, rather than the knowledge of our own specialty. Therefore, for modern people, the first thing is to master a skill, and secondly, if we have the ability, we can learn other knowledge, which will help us develop higher and better.

I think generalists are actually more popular, but generalists also need to have a special professional place.

Young people should choose generalists, the scope of employment of specialists is very narrow, it is not easy to find a job, but generalists learn a lot, find a job has a foundation to study deeply, and it is easier to find a job.

I believe that in order to better adapt to the needs of society, young people should focus on specialists first, and then think about generalists.

It's better to choose a specialist, after all, there is a specialization in the art industry, and it is still very good if you are strong in a field, after all, people's energy is limited, and you can't do anything.

I think it's best to be a professional, to be proficient in something, and to be able to contribute to society!

First of all, as we all know, our high school in China is a complete generalist education.

Students spend three years improving their grades in various subjects and then strive to get into a good university.

But after college, you don't know what you're proficient in, because you're a generalist in physics, chemistry, politics, history, geography, and English! But at this time, the university school requires you to choose a major! Are you only able to follow your parents?

Teacher? Senior? Advice to choose a major that will allow you to become a professional!

In fact, I think that the reason why we should start choosing majors in universities is because today's society needs professionals, and it is because of the needs of today's society that this rule will come out in order for students to prepare for employment and choose careers.

I hope that today's college students can manage their time well, so that they can become a professional talent with a clear understanding of the future, rather than being a person who is not very good at anything! By the time you graduate, you'll realize what an advantage it is to have a proficient skill!

Secondly, to educate everyone professionally, everyone performs their own duties, is to maximize their own ability, not that you know everything, but only let you do one of them, you will have doubts about your career development, and it is not conducive to the stability of your career future development!

With the progress of society, the division of labor is becoming more and more refined, and the requirements for the fineness and depth of work are getting higher and higher, so the extreme desire and demand for professionals is highlighted. Today's society is increasingly in need of skilled people in a certain field.

People's time and energy are limited, so focusing on a certain area is improvingProductivityThe only condition. Only with efficient work will there be a higher efficiency in cooperation.

At this moment, what society needs more is professionals.

Difference Between Specialist and Generalist:

If a person's abilities are represented in a box plot, then generalists should be evenly distributed, neither too high nor too low; Specialists, on the other hand, have one or even several cones that stand out.

Different from these two kinds of people, there is another kind of person, one is called all-rounder, which refers to many aspects are very prominent, this kind of person can often change an era, and there are very few.

Generalists have a role in society, but as the saying goes: lubricants have their role, but it's the gears that make the car work.

The advantage of a generalist is that (comprehensive knowledge, ability to integrate thinking) (better communication), communication only plays the role of lubricant, but the core function of the car is not lubrication, but forward. In the same way, the healthy operation of a team requires generalists to communicate, but the most fundamental thing is that the professionals perform their own duties.

Generalists with multiple skills are better able to adapt to the changes of modern society than those with only one skill, and generalists are more likely to adapt to the development of society than specialists.

Because generalists have a wider range of knowledge, in the case of going it alone, generalists have more opportunities to integrate than specialists, but the opponent seems to have forgotten that the background of our discussion today is modern society, in such a context, people are not isolated, scientific research is often done by teams, in recent years, the Nobel Prize awards, almost all of the winners are composed of top professionals in many fields, which just proves that the cooperation of experts can collide with huge sparks.

To sum up, generalists are broad but not refined, specialized is specialized but not complete, both kinds of talents have their own roles, but the progress of society needs more professionals to make breakthroughs, so contemporary society needs more professionals.

1.Comparison of generalist and specialist contributions.

The general trend since the end of World War II has been one of increasing importance of expertise, and the world is indeed becoming more and more specialized ......But the importance of expertise peaked in 1985, and then dramatically. Generalists and all-rounders are becoming more and more important.

Since then, the role of professionals has remained stable for a while, but after 2007 it began to decline again. Researchers analyze that this is likely because now that with the Internet, professional knowledge is becoming more and more easily recognized, and the scarcity of professionals has further declined.

So now the world is probably a generalist who has overtaken a specialist. The more serious problem for professionals is that the fields they specialize in are relatively narrow, and the uncertainty of this direction is relatively low. The result is a lot of competition, and if you make a breakthrough, others will learn from it right away.

2.Generalists are worth more.

Today's society is becoming more and more detailed, and many specialists are needed, and the education system also cultivates specialists, but the real value is generalists. In particular, a leadership position, such as the CEO of a company, should be involved in various fields.

A survey of the biographies of 4,500 CEOs revealed that they had worked in more than 35,000 different positions. The researchers looked at the diversity of the CEOs' previous occupations to determine whether they were "specialists" or "generalists." The result is that "generalists" are more popular.

The average salary of a "generalist CEO" is 19% higher than that of a "generalist CEO"—which equates to $1 million more per year.

If it is a particularly complex business, such as skills involving mergers and acquisitions, generalists can earn 44% more than specialists.

3.It's better to be an all-rounder.

The characteristic of a generalist is that he has a core field of his own, in which he delves deeper than generalists, but not as deep as specialists. But the all-rounder doesn't just focus on this one area, he is able to apply skills from his core areas to neighboring areas. In this way, he was able to learn new things, so much so that in the end he was even more versatile than a generalist.

Versatile people can often span dozens of patent types! The creativity of all-rounders is the strongest.

What kind of people are the most innovative? Our conclusion is that you can delve into it very deeply, or it can be very broad, preferably both deep and ......broadWhat I am most afraid of is that I can't do it deeply, nor can I do it widely.

4.The world needs generalists, but it also needs specialists.

Some mathematicians are birds, some are frogs. Birds fly high and have a wide view of mathematics, and they like the concept of unity, which can connect different territories in mathematics. Frogs live in the mud and can only see the flowers and plants around them, and they delve into the details, solving only one problem at a time.

I happen to be a frog, but a lot of my friends are birds. What I'm trying to say is that math needs both birds and frogs. —Freeman Dyson.

That's definitely more specialist. 1.The existence of professional talents is the foundation of all-round talents!

The society needs professional talents even more! 2.The knowledge that a person has learned and the skills he has mastered cannot be exhaustive, and he must have some emphasis, which is his "specialization", and in his professional field, he can contribute to social development; And when a person lives in the world, he will naturally have his own hobbies, just like Einstein loved **, but this is just a hobby, which is of little use to society, and is not enough to be called an "all-rounder"; If you force it to be perfect, you will not have enough time for professional research, and in the end, it will be half a bottle of vinegar in all aspects, and what is the use of society?

3.It is the professionals who promote the development of science, because only by investing enough energy in research can it be possible to discover the shortcomings of old knowledge and create new knowledge; Extra-generalists, on the other hand, have reached their current heights in one field, and then move on to other fields, because there is new knowledge created by "specialists" who can only learn from behind.

Generalists, of course.

First of all, the society is changing rapidly, and it is difficult for only one skill to gain a long-term foothold, and it is difficult to cope with the changing social environment.

Modern life is changing day by day, and the rate at which things change is amazing. If professionals can only do one thing, AI will eventually replace them, and at the same time, these professionals will not be able to accept knowledge in new fields in the short term, and it will be difficult to gain a foothold.

For example, the sudden epidemic has caused many professionals who cannot work to lose their jobs, while generalists can adapt to changes more quickly in the face of the same situation, and quickly find their place in the right field and find a way out.

Secondly, modern society needs generalists more, because compared with specialists, generalists involve a wide range of knowledge, and can be organically connected from multiple fields and angles, helping to open up thinking and overcome technical difficulties. Of course, society needs generalists, but that doesn't mean that you know a little bit about all fields. A true generalist is able to penetrate in simple terms and has attainments in many fields.

Generalists should also have the excellence of specialists. Only by learning more extensively on the basis of becoming a specialist and continuously acquiring knowledge with an open and inclusive mind can one become a generalist in the true sense. This puts forward higher requirements for people in the new era.

Professionals are valuable, and generalists are even more expensive. However, this does not mean that you should give up becoming an expert in a certain field, nor does it mean that you only care about a broad understanding of shallow knowledge, but that you should pursue "generalism" on the basis of "specialization" and become a generalist who can better cope with changes and has comprehensive strength.

Modern society needs generalists even more.

It's like if you're an IE engineer, you don't just have to know the process things, you have to be able to read financial statements, you have to know some basic programming, and you have to know some basic mechanical knowledge, especially to read drawings.

If you let all these tasks be done by professionals. What would have taken one person to complete, it would take seven or eight to complete. The combination of several aspects of a person's ability, and the combination of several people's ability in one aspect, let's compare.

It must be one person who can deal with these aspects, and it will be better to cooperate, and the optimal solution can be made.

I think modern society needs professionals more. Expertise refers to a certain field with a certain knowledge base; Specialized high-precision talents, while generalists refer to general talents across multiple fields. The two have a relative advantage, the advantage of a specialist over a generalist is that his knowledge is more profound, and the disadvantage of a specialist over a generalist is that his knowledge is not as extensive as that of a generalist.

Only on the basis of such strengths and weaknesses can we discuss what kind of talents are more needed in modern society. Today, when we discuss what kind of talents the society needs more, we are actually looking at who can better promote the benign operation and sustainable development of modern society.

First, from the perspective of personal development. A person's energy and time are limited. Life is short for decades, we concentrate on one field and can not guarantee achievement, if we disperse our energy to all fields to taste, not only can not better reflect the value of the individual, but also cause irreparable waste of social talents.

For example, we can compare human energy to a certain amount of water, if there are more cups of water, then there is less water in each cup, that is to say, the more fields of study, the less knowledge in each field. In the same way, professionals who devote themselves to a field are more able to have a deeper understanding of the profession, and can grasp the high-speed updated knowledge in this era of knowledge, and constantly improve their self-strength, so as to be more promoting.

into the benign operation and sustainable development of modern society. Just like Mr. Lu Xun said, it is better to be fine than mixed, and it is better to specialize than more.

Second, from the perspective of social needs. A high degree of division of labor is a distinctive feature of modern society. A brief history of social development.

Social development is spiraling, while the social division of labor is developing in a canopy. In the first chapter of Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations, he also says that "the more delicate the division of labor, the more developed the economy." "With the continuous refinement of the division of labor, it is particularly important for professionals to maximize the use of their knowledge in each detailed field.

The generalists are not specialized enough, resulting in the blurring of their division of labor, and even if the division of labor is made, it is difficult for the generalists to make a greater breakthrough in this field than the generalists. After the division of labor is integration, integration is the first thing we think of is cooperation, cooperation between professionals to avoid duplication of work, and at the same time more efficient.

Third, we should talk about the contribution of professionals to society. Professionals can extend and broaden their knowledge, and this is what we call innovation, and we emphasize that professionals are more capable of making breakthroughs, and their creative thinking is not possessed by all-rounders. As we all know, many creative ideas and inventions that lead to social change and promote social progress are put forward by professionals.

For example, the steam revolution, the electrical revolution, the information revolution.

To sum up, modern society needs more specialists.