Is it true that there are children who are poor for a long time, and children who are rich and do no

It is true, but this proverb can only vary from person to person.

There are children who are poor, and soon, no children and no wealth will not be long, which roughly means that when two people are together, if there are descendants, even if they are very poor now, as long as they train their descendants very well, go to college, and have their own stable jobs, the income will be very considerable, this is the so-called having children and poverty, and soon their sons will have achievements, and their parents' faces will also have light, and they will also follow, and they will become rich.

The meaning of having no children and being rich for a long time means that the two of you are like rich multimillionaires now, if you don't have children of your own, then your future property can only go into the coffin with you, because you don't have a descendant to inherit. No one will inherit your current business, but I feel that this proverb is impossible to say, so it must vary from person to person.

Just like we are in the countryside, every family will have children, and they must train their children to become college students, or graduate students, if there is only one child in a family, this child will be angry, fortunately, if you don't fight for luck, you will not go to college, and you can only earn two or three thousand in income, and you can only be a commoner, so if you have a child who is poor for a short time, this sentence can only vary from person to person. The children of their own family will not be poor for a long time, and if they do not become poor, they will be poor until the next generation.

It's like a relative's house of mine, and he calls it son. My relative's family is really very rich, and all our relatives are envious, they will go home every year to get a good car, and they have a house in other places, and the family has a house, such an economic situation in our rural area, is already considered a rich man, but his son is particularly unlucky, did not go to college, and is addicted to games all day long.

I always feel that his parents earn enough money for him to spend, so she doesn't need to work hard, I feel that a person like him, even if he is rich now, may not be in his next generation, because his own son does not work hard, and he does not struggle like them, so I feel that this proverb still varies from person to person, and it can't be said so deadly.

Maybe it used to be like this, but in terms of the current society, this sentence is not true, there are children who have been poor for a long time, and there will be blessings if they have no children, Xiao Ke feels that this sentence should be said now.

It is not long to have a son who is poor, which means that as long as he has a son, even if he is poor now, he still has hope, he can cultivate his son well, maybe his son will be on the gold list in the future, and at this time he will not be poor anymore, even if his son is not successful, then he will have a grandson, and there will always be one of the three generations who can succeed, which is what people say has a son to have a chance.

Childless and rich does not last, which means that even if you are rich now, you have no son to inherit your career, and no son to inherit your great future, because in ancient times, only sons could enter the court as officials, and daughters could only stay in the backyard, so it is said that no son can be rich for a long time.

But in the society we live in now, it is not necessarily this kind of sentiment, the family has a son, may treat the child as a baby and spoil, no longer the original poor child, now the son and daughter are raised as ancestors, at this time, most of the sons are not promising, and in this era of job competition pressure, men and women have begun to compete fairly for positions, and at this time men need to marry wives and buy houses.

And the daughter, only need to raise her rich, whether it is rich in life or rich in knowledge, at this time the daughter will generally have some good jobs, and the excellent and knowledgeable daughter can jump to a higher level through marriage, and the man, his family situation is the same as that of a girl, so he may marry a woman who is the right one with him, or lower than his own family, and even if the girl's family situation is the same as that of a boy, but she has knowledge and literacy, At this time, her family conditions are also good, so the choice will be larger.

And because parents need to help boys marry wives and raise children, the family will basically be hollowed out, and now there are really few boys who are promising, even if he is talented, he is just an ordinary person, so he will have a hard time like his parents, and the parents of girls, because there is no such pressure, their daughters are knowledgeable and worthy of anyone, so their lives will be easier and happier.

This is an old Chinese saying, a product of the period of China's agricultural society, which is very applicable in the ancient Chinese society dominated by agriculture, but with the development of the times, this statement has fallen far behind.

China's thousands of years of ancient history, generations to agricultural production, agricultural production requires huge manpower, from the physiological characteristics of men are strong, more suitable for manual labor, women are delicate and frail suitable for weaving and cooking at home, this is the form of China's patriarchal society, there are children who are poor for a long time, and no children are rich for a long time is the product of this era. At the same time, in the ancient patriarchal society, women were not allowed to show their heads, they were not allowed to learn to read and write, and their careers were also men's worlds, so if they wanted to get rich and developed in ancient times, as long as they relied on multiple children to engage in manual labor or study to enter the official career, they could glorify their ancestors and lead their families to get rich, which was correct in ancient society.

Nowadays we are in an economic society, where all people are created equal, and women and men have the same opportunities. Therefore, this statement is not true in modern society. There was an old lady who gave birth to 6 sons in this life, and she worked hard to raise them for them to go to school, but when the old lady was seriously ill, none of the six sons cared for her, and finally died because she had no money for treatment.

A female office worker stayed up late to drink coffee during pregnancy because she worked overtime all the year round, and she didn't pay attention at all during pregnancy, and as a result, she gave birth to a son with autism.

Each era has different products, and as the times progress, so does culture.

This sentence can only be the "golden sentence" recognized by the old society, it is okay to have a son in the current society, but if there are more than two very rich, my husband's family is two sons, his family is poor, and the two sons really don't feel good.

My brother-in-law's family also has two sons, and after they each have a family, the two brothers have not been in contact for three or four years, this is the so-called "brother"!

There are such examples around me, many families are like this, raising two sons, desperately fighting for the old man's property, each living their own life, old and dead do not get along, where does "wealth" come from?

There is indeed nothing wrong with this sentence in the old society, most of the past relied on manual work to earn money, men's physical strength is indeed much better than women's physical strength, of course, it is easier to get rich, plus the brotherhood in the past is still real, "brothers work together, work together to break gold", but now brothers are not as close as before, and the relationship is not so good.

There are three sons in the family, such a day is worse than death, my aunt's three sons, the youngest son can't even marry a daughter-in-law, the current girl heard that the two sons of the family have no discussion, the three sons' family doesn't even give a chance, seeing that it's almost 30, even a girlfriend has not been found.

The relationship between the three brothers is not so good, and they go back to their hometown for a day every year during the Chinese New Year, and they usually don't contact each other, can such a brotherly relationship be "rich"?

On the contrary, only the daughter in the family is more affluent, there is an aunt who has two daughters, the eldest daughter is a doctor, and the second daughter is also engaged in research, my aunt and uncle are both disabled, and it is a joke to say that making money for the two of them to go to college, both of them are student loans and relatives to fund the university.

After the two daughters worked, one of them contributed part of the money to build the family house, and they both bought a house in Wuhan and settled in Wuhan, and my aunt also helped them take care of the children.

It is no longer the society it used to be, and it still needs sons to use brute force and physical strength to support the family, and now they all rely on their own ability to make money, so the previous saying that there are many sons and many blessings has also been broken by reality.

First of all, I think this is a kind of patriarchal thinking, and there are really not many people who are so modern and Westernized in today's era, and there are still people who are so complacent about their thinking.

In reality, there are many examples, and now there is only one child, and all of them are girls' families, very, very many. My uncle is like this, the eldest daughter is four years old and the youngest daughter is four months old, because the current two-child policy is in general practice, they responded to the policy to have a second child and a girl, but their family of four is also very happy.

My uncle's business is doing well in Chengdu, and he has not caused a little trouble or influence in the business because he has two daughters. Not now and not in the future, because his current life is based on his own hard work, and he doesn't believe in those traditional old ideas at all.

Let's go back and look at the current situation of the families of those who have more sons. I had a male classmate, when he was 19 years old, his mother gave birth to twin brothers, their original family was not very wealthy, because of the birth of two younger brothers, he had to drop out of school and go out to work.

Because the education is not high, so some of the work he does can only be manual work, the current society is so realistic, all enterprises have to look at the academic qualifications, but because the family is poor, he does not have the education that others want, and the monthly salary is about 2000 yuan.

His father was building walls and moving bricks for others on the construction site, and his monthly salary was no more than 5,000, and his mother took care of his two younger brothers at home and could not work.

Now my male classmate is about twenty-five or sixteen years old, but he hasn't even had a family or even a girlfriend. It's not that he can't find a girlfriend, but because, first, he has no education, second, his family is poor, and now girls are also very realistic, they can only see the current situation in front of them.

If their family continues to maintain the current status quo, then the two younger brothers will also be forced to study because of life, which will lead to a series of life problems in the future.

Therefore, looking at the poverty and wealth of a family has never had anything to do with having a boy or a girl, what needs to be seen is a family's outlook on life, values and worldview. Only with the formation of these three views will they have a good life in the future, not that the more sons the better.

The saying that children are poor for a short time, and that no children will not grow rich is actually quite reasonable.

China has always been a patriarchal country. This is due to China's 5,000-year history. In ancient China, it was a small-scale peasant economy, mostly self-sufficient, and needed to support the family's expenses through labor.

At this time, boys are particularly important, and if they have a son, they will have a labor force. <>

Maybe the family was poor at first, but if they had a son, they would have been able to work to get more food. With food, you can exchange it for better things. So they will get better and richer the better.

And if there are boys in the house, and they can marry wives in the future, then they will add more people to the house, and there will be one more person who will do this, and they will have no worries when they work in the fields. If the wife gives birth to a son while pregnant, then there will be more and more people in the family, and then they will become richer and richer.

And for those who are rich, maybe they are very rich, they can be rich. They live a carefree life, but the only thing that bothers them is that they don't have a son. If you don't have a son, it means that no one will inherit your wealth, so when you have no one to inherit your property, no matter how much money you make, it is useless to keep it for your wife and daughter.

When the daughter grows up, she will marry someone who will take away part of the dowry, then. The wealth of the rich will be divided into a part. After the death of a rich man, if his wife remarries, then these properties will change owners, and the rich man will become poorer and poorer.

Careful consideration of this sentence is still very reasonable.

Personally, I feel that there is some truth in this sentence. The situation of having a son is completely different from not having a son, but we have found that some people will work harder when they have children and they are constantly struggling, but if they do not have children, they will lose the motivation to struggle, and thus they will be poor.

From the specific situation analysis, after having a son, we need to be busy for him from an early age, whether it is milk powder money or school money, or future living expenses, we need to take into account from all aspects, and under the pressure of these motivations, we will work harder and make money, so as to slowly improve our living standards, and after we have worked hard, we will find that there is still surplus in our lives, so this is the wealth that struggle brings to ourselves.

For people who don't have a son, even if they have some wealth at present, they will slowly find that life is very boring, so they have been squandering their property, and they don't have so much motivation to make money, and they always feel that their pressure is not enough, so they will slowly let themselves dispel the idea of struggle, so that they will become poor after they squander, and these are the consequences of their continuous squandering.

In fact, no matter whether you have children or not, in the end, the main thing is the happiness of family life, so you still need to work hard to see good results, when we find that there is some lack of motivation, it will lead to our own poor life. And these things are just like our life principles, whether we are motivated or not, we have to put some pressure on ourselves, and we also need to make our lives normal in life, so we still have children to support us.