How to make yourself hungry has a logical point of view

First you have to know what you're going to say.

Then, you have to analyze what you should follow step by step.

Multi-purpose use "only ............"Because ............Wait, connect what you want to say, and only when it is coherent can it be logical.

For example, I have to tell how to conceive and express in order to be logical, only if you know exactly what you want to say, you will not talk nonsense; Only when you conceive carefully, and all the examples and reasoning are clear, can you be convincing and coherent in saying this; Because your expression is coherent and organized, the audience will find your words very logical.

In fact, speaking is an art, not a difficult art, as long as you speak in an orderly manner, what to say first, then what to say, and finally what to say, coherently without inserting some messy things in the middle, it is logical.

Logical thinking mentions that there is a theory in psychology - the theory of cognitive dissonance.

1.Many people didn't believe in koi fish at first, why did they believe it later? There's a theory in psychology that explains this – the theory of cognitive dissonance.

The reason why they didn't believe it at first, and then they will**, is because their cognition has been out of tune, and they eventually changed their concepts and behaviors.

2.Normally, our cognitions and behaviors will be consistent, but in special cases, there will be situations where cognitions and behaviors contradict each other. This is called "cognitive dissonance".

In this case, it can be a stressful and unpleasant experience. In order to reduce this uncomfortable feeling, people make changes, and it is common to adjust their attitude so that it is consistent with their behavior.

For example, many people know that "smoking is harmful to health", but they just can't quit, what should they do? will use the views of "not so harmful" and "it's okay to smoke less" to convince themselves.

Lu Xiao today draws the focus:

Koi has been very popular recently, just like Double Eleven, it seems that the circle of friends is full of shopping information, and if you don't participate, you will seem to be outdated.

For example, many people don't believe in a certain project at first, but they conflict with the phenomenon of "everyone is buying" and "many people are really making money" in the circle of friends, bigwigs, and friends around them, in order to reduce the discomfort caused by imbalance, some people will change their cognition, "maybe they can really make money", so as to join the ranks of investment.

Hello, let your point of view be logical, first of all, you have your own opinion on a thing. There is a causal link before and after.

You can start with a draft and then explain the problem item by item, and if you have a good memory, you don't need to look at the draft.

Hey!! Luckily, you didn't study philosophy, and what you haven't eaten is always fragrant

It's also a manifestation of psychology, isn't it?

This is indeed an industry that tests one's self-cultivation, it can be said to be a skill, sometimes we think that is a shortcoming, in fact, to the point where we learn from psychology, we know how much that those are just a foot with a shoe, we feel that it is a shortcoming because we have our own set of standards, so we want to put it on others. Personally, I feel that at this point, if we position ourselves in the role of a psychiatrist or a teacher, then we are not qualified.

The predicate of the mandate of heaven is sexuality, the predicate of recklessness is the Tao, and the predicate of cultivation is teaching. The worst psychiatrist is one who makes the people he consults think is abnormal and immoral. There are a lot of such psychologists, and basically I feel that they are everywhere, so I hate this industry very much, and even have prejudices.

There are a lot of mediocrities, so there's no need to make yourself one of them.

Since you know that this is related to your own virtue, then cultivate your own virtue, the "Analects" is very good, and the "Vimala Sutra" is also very good (from infatuation and love, I am sick), some things will only show good results after they have a certain amount of experience and become mature.

No one can say that he is absolutely right, and he has his own shortcomings, and the so-called virtue in this regard is nothing but sparing oneself and others, although we feel that we are not God, but it is a pity that even if we learn all the knowledge in books, we cannot discern everything in the world like God.

The biggest difference between psychology and philosophy is that one is the study of how people behave in a particular situation, while the study of philosophy is a whole. Psychology is more trivial, while philosophy is a bit more general, and the study of the majority of groups is studied. There are only two uses of my sensory psychology, one is to educate people and guide others to a good direction; The other is to use human weakness to achieve some kind of benefit that he wants.

As for you, I feel that you are a little sluggish in learning, if it is someone else, if you know that others are pretending to be high-profile to hide their inferiority, then you should help him regain his self-confidence or another behavior to obtain his own benefits.

What is the reason why you chose to study psychology in the first place? Do you think psychology can easily analyze the shortcomings of others? What humans do best is disguise.

The common denominator between psychology and philosophy is that both have a lot of objective opinions, which are acceptable, but from the questions you react, can I think that you are very frivolous and proud, and think that you are capable of analyzing a person thoroughly? And then does this feel like dismantling a machine? There is contempt in it.

If I'm wrong, that's okay, I didn't study philosophy and psychology, I just look at things from a mortal perspective. Everything that can exist in the world has a certain rationality.

The first is the physiological basis of mental activity. The second is the social basis of psychological activity.

On the one hand, it is combined with biological sciences, the physiological basis of mental activity. It extends into the field of technical sciences, linking with computer science and contributing to the development of cognitive science. Psychology also studies the occurrence and development of the human individual, providing a developmental view of people's cognitive abilities and personality socialization.

On the other hand, psychology is combined with social sciences to study social, political, economic, and cultural influences, as well as psychosocial phenomena in interpersonal interactions. Nowadays, psychology has developed more broadly and complexly, which requires a theoretical generalization of it from a philosophical perspective. Theoretical psychology is the ideological system of psychology from a macro perspective.

Philosophy is the study of the essence of things, not the great truth, and it is not the same thing as the books you mentioned.

Psychology points to the microcosm, while philosophy uses the macrocosm to guide the understanding of the world, so both are important, philosophy is especially important, and it has the role of dialectical guidance for everything.

To be honest, I studied psychology · · If you study psychology directly, you will find that psychology is very boring·· So I recommend studying philosophy first, then psychology... By the way, tell you about it... Many psychologists who have made achievements in psychology have a bachelor's degree in philosophy, a master's degree in psychology, and a doctorate in everything. After studying psychology with a philosophical foundation, you will find psychology wonderful, and I hope my answers will help you

You might want to consider taking sociology at the same time.

The study of sociology can recognize the psychology and behavior of many groups, which is more interesting.

Depending on your interests, you can also minor in college, which is not a contradiction.

Where to study psychology, it is easy to go from psychology to philosophy, and it is difficult to go from philosophy to psychology.

Psychology is more practical, if you can study it, and you have a psychologist qualification, it is better to find a job.

Philosophy sounds good, but, you think, what can you do after learning this? You can be a teacher, what else? Unless you're a good learner.

Psychology is good.

Psychology has practical implications.

It can be used in many ways.

Help you understand the other person's heart.

Thus overwhelming the other party with momentum.

And philosophy is not suitable for actual combat.

So I think psychology would be better.

Philosophy is good, psychology is easy to distort.

Although there is logical reasoning and logical reasoning in both, philosophy may be more helpful or practical in our lives than psychology.

Although psychology is concerned with real entities (humans or animals), this entity is only a carrier, and psychology studies an unspecific thing (i.e., mental activity) through this carrier, and in this kind of behavior (referring to psychological research), it always refines rational thinking through perceptual activities and finds out its laws and things that are close to laws, but the ambiguity and unpredictability of mental activities are destined to make it difficult to derive generalized laws in this aspect of research. In other words, it is difficult to reveal the essence of phenomena in this field, and the guidance and application of the research results in real life will be very limited.

Human beings start from understanding the relationship between themselves and themselves, and then resolve confusion and conflict, change their inner spiritual world, so as to obtain the meaning and value of life, so that human beings study their own problems.

Psychology has a long past, but the history of psychology as an independent discipline is short. Western psychology originated from the philosophy of ancient Greece, since Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and others, philosophers of all ages have regarded the "heart" as one of the main problems in philosophy. The word psychology is a Greek word that means the science of the soul.

The soul also means gas or breath in Greek, because ancient people believed that life depended on breathing, and when breathing stopped, life ended. With the development of science, the object of psychology changed from the soul to the mind. Psychology, on the other hand, is the science of the mind.

This doctrine does not contain scientific concepts, but only philosophical significance.

It was not until the end of the nineteenth century that a separate discipline began to form due to the influence of biology.

Psychology is a major component of philosophy, especially the philosophy of mind or the humanities, and a major branch of the sciences of the future.