i5 760 vs i5 2300 which is better

If you compare with each other, it should be said that there is no comparison, because the technology used is different.

The two CPUs are just inherited from the name, the core structure, the technical indicators can't be said to be completely different, it's almost the same, at least from the most basic platform, it can be seen from the most basic platform, and it can't be known universally at all.

In terms of performance, the new instruction set, named as a physical 4 core, has graphics processing power. So this can't be compared like that.

Of course, i5 750 can be overclocked, but that's only a matter of time, and now the second generation has just been launched**slightly higher** when it is stable, it can be upgraded to the second generation cough overclocking version. However, the i5 750 uses the 1156 platform, which cannot be upgraded to the new version of the core. Moreover, if it is the pursuit of performance, it is better to buy the CPU of the i7, so it can be said that the focus of the pursuit of the i5 CPU should be focused on the new core technology.

Therefore, at this stage, if you have already bought the i5 750, use it for the time being, since you can overclock, use it for overclocking. Don't waste features, but it's not advisable to upgrade to Gen 2 now. Now the first is inflated, the application is not mature enough, the actual performance is not improved, and the second generation is only for the convenience of future expansion.

There is not much difference between the two CPUs.

The i52300 is nothing more than a GPU

Nothing more. It is recommended to go to the last i5

The motherboard supports SATATIIII and .

There is great potential for upgrading in the future.

Official parameters: i5-7400, main frequency 3G, turbo frequency.

i5-6500, main frequency, turbo frequency.

So a 7th generation, a 6th generation, there is not much difference between the two, so how much difference is there between the two?

Second, the test platform.

Configuration 1: CPU: i5-7400

Heat dissipation: TT Jupiter 8 temperature control version.

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VD Plus

Memory: TEAMGROUP 8G 2400

Storage: Kingston UV400 240G

Power supply: Kangshu Smart 400

Chassis: ICE I (top power supply).

System: win10 64bit 1607

Configuration 2: CPU: i5-6500

Heat dissipation: TT Jupiter 8 temperature control version.

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VD Plus

Memory: TEAMGROUP 8G 2400

Storage: Kingston UV400 240G

Power supply: Kangshu Smart 400

Chassis: TT Voyager S3 (bottom power supply).

System: win10 64bit 1607

In fact, a Chunsen person thinks that for the core display platform, the heat dissipation of the bottom power supply should not be bent like the design of the overhead power supply, because the overhead power supply directly draws away the heat generated near the CPU, and the bottom power supply design cannot absorb the heat generated by the CPU if the rear fan is not added (of course, the specific situation is changeable, for example, if the bottom chassis uses a side-blown radiator?). Let's do it first, but it suddenly occurred to me)

3. CPU-Z score comparison (the two are almost the same).

This is the CPU-Z recognition parameter, i5-7400 minimum frequency, and then a CPU-Z measurement vertical score (although there is no evidence to prove how much reference the single-thread and multi-thread scores of CPU-Z are, but let's take a brief look).

1761 single-core, 6546 multi-threaded

Here is a screenshot of the i5-6500, the minimum clock speed.

Single-core 1789, multi-threaded 6543

Comparison: i5-7400, single-core 1761, multi-threaded 6546

i5-6500, single-core 1789, multi-threaded 6543

The i5-6500 is a little more efficient with a single core, and the multi-threading is almost the same? (Some netizens asked, why don't you compare chess with super pi?) Because I didn't want to compare the two at all, this is the two machines I installed this afternoon, mainly to observe the change of the CPU main frequency, I originally wanted to publish two articles, one thought, it is okay to combine the two into one, so that the amount of content is also large, the article also has highlights, only CPU-Z also has a single core and multi-threaded, the same accessories and systems, with examinability, so the final article became a comparison between the two).

One is 7th generation, the other is 10th generation, and the same i5 processor is three generations behind.

It may be because the processor gap is not as obvious as that of graphics GPUs, but each generation of CPUs has significantly improved single-core and multi-core performance.

In terms of frequency, the default frequency of 7500 is, 10500 is, but the overclocking upper limit is a little stronger than 7500.

In addition, the main thing is that the 7500 is a quad-core four-thread, and the 10500 is a six-core twelve-thread, which is a huge improvement.

1. The number of cores and threads of i5-7500 is much less than that of i5-10500, so the multi-core performance is much lower, and the multi-core performance of i5-10500 is twice that of i5-7500.

2. However, i5-7500 and i5-10500 are both 14nm process, and the architecture has not been greatly changed, so the gap in single-core performance is not so big. The i5-7500's single-core performance is 17% lower than that of the i5-10500.

Contrast.

i5+6600 is good, and i5+7400 is good.

Official parameters: i5-7400, main frequency 3G, turbo frequency, main frequency, turbo frequency in terms of power consumption i5-6500 is a little larger, overall there is little difference. It is generally recommended which one to buy cheaply, and the cost-effective Core i5 processor is a product of Intel, which is also based on the Intel Nehalem microarchitecture.

Unlike the Core i7, which supports triple-channel memory, the Core i5 will only integrate a dual-channel DDR3 memory controller. In addition, the Core i5 will integrate some Northbridge features and will integrate a PCI-Express controller. The interface is also different from the LGA 1366 of the Core i7, which uses the new LGA 1156.