-
Well, if you chat, it's enough to have 1G memory, CPU, general, good, your large memory+AMD U can play the performance of the integrated graphics card very well, and it's enough to make a small picture or something, if you want to install Vista, it is recommended to use a good U 3600 double and above. P 4 is fine.
-
1.Dual-core is not very needed.
2.Integrated irrelevant (you don't play games).
shop has a certain optimization for dual-core (not much faster with dual-core)4with a high-frequency p4
Do you want to play Vista's dual-core installation!!
INETL Core 2 has good performance and AMD is cheap.
Choose one of the two.
-
p4 631 599
pd 820 615
These are all good.
The performance of the first two is very good, 631 or 65 nm.
The 820 is dual-core.
The 4200 performance is also good.
It's not bad for you to see for yourself.
-
AMD is suitable for surfing the Internet, playing games, and also for overclocking, AMD does not measure the performance of a CPU at the main frequency, including system optimization, and a variety of complex instruction sets, acceleratorsGood value for money.
3800+ is better, and the L2 cache is higher.
-
If you have the conditions, of course, the higher the configuration, the better.,Dual-core CPU + 1G memory,Good thing。
-
You don't need a dual-core, single-core Celeron can do the job with a large memory.
-
If you have enough money, buy it, dual-core is the trend.
-
No, you're OK in this case P4!
-
There is nothing wrong with the processor, and a single core is enough.
I guess 1G memory is not enough.
It is even more not enough to use Vista in the future.
Recommend 1G x2, the best dual-core with the ability, recommend X2 3600+, cheap and practical, good overclocking ability.
-
Dual-core is not much more expensive, buy it, and regret it later!
-
I recommend a low-end dual-core CPU to you Pentium D820, dual-core processing power, and the price is not high, it is more than enough to cope with these problems If you don't play 3D games with Core 2, it's a bit wasteful
lz misunderstood, it's not like that, 4 cores are only better than dual cores when dealing with multi-threaded (more than 2 threads) tasks, and at present, except for a few professional tools, there is no software and games that support multi-threaded tasks, so the family uses 2 cores out of 4 cores at all, and when 4 cores are used to process dual-threaded tasks, only 2 cores work, and the frequency of 4 cores is not single-core frequency multiplied by 4, if a program requires it, then dual-core is stronger than 4 cores. >>>More
Don't ghost the system.
To put it on step by step, it's good. >>>More
Available platforms: AMD
CPU Species: Athlon64, Athlon64, FX, Athlon, 64, X2, Sempron >>>More
yes, there's lankyu here, so let's shut up.
Hello landlord: Found a problem Could it be that the dual-core we bought is running with a single core? >>>More