What if some leaders just like to strike a balance?

After grasping the right to reward and punish and use human rights, the rest of the power can be moderately liberalized and authorized to do it, and it is not a good thing to grasp all the power in your own hands as a leader. Rather, it is necessary to use authorization to stimulate everyone's enthusiasm, but the scope of this power must be limited, and the reasonable distribution of power is the core of balance and containment. For example, the legislative, executive and judicial powers of the state, the separation of powers is the distribution of power.

The company is also responsible for its own finance, business, technology, etc.

The balance is right, no matter what is good and evil, what to do is to consolidate power, strengthen authority, eliminate dissent, re-establish the relationship between superiors and subordinates, clarify the hierarchical consciousness between organizations, clarify where power lies, and smoothly implement their own ideas and policies as a leader.

In fact, this kind of situation can be seen in many places, don't be too surprised, just take care of your own work, and don't care about what other people do, just do your own work.

If you are a person with a lot of ability and ideas, and since he likes to strike a balance, then you have to try to prove that you are the best, or give up the job to find a leader who can find your talents.

If you can't make a better suggestion, then accept the leader's way of dealing with it. In fact, it is better for both sides to achieve a balance of powers, checks and balances, and to improve the work efficiency of both sides.

In short, what the leader likes is sleek, listen to his arrangement, of course, I prefer to be capable and sleek, can be his right-hand man, a good leader will take into account everyone in the team, and the bad one may be biased, targeting, in the end, the leader is very poor, and the team does not have a little cohesion and combat effectiveness

In fact, there is nothing wrong with people's thinking, people are in order to make everyone more satisfied, there is no sense of gap, there will not be too much pressure, it's good, it's also to retain more people.

Two groups of people fought, the leader gave the A faction project, and then gave the B faction project for the sake of balance. In fact, the project is better for faction A, but the leaders in the system like to achieve balance, and of course it is possible that the leaders do not want faction A to be too prominent.

When there is a conflict between the work tasks given by the leader and the personal philosophy, here are some suggestions:

1.Communication: First, try to communicate openly and honestly with your leader and explain your philosophy and why you think a different approach would be more appropriate. Try to be calm, respectful, and rational so that effective communication and constructive discussions can take place.

2.Explain why: When communicating with your leader, highlight your point of view and rationale, and explain why you think this approach makes more sense. Having clear and well-reasoned arguments helps your argument be more persuasive.

3.Explore compromises: If your leaders don't agree with you, try to work with them to explore compromises.

Look for a way that meets the expectations of your leadership while maintaining your commitment to what you do. This may require compromise on both sides, but it can promote a good working relationship and mutual understanding.

4.Follow the leader's instructions: If you can't convince the leader or reach a consensus, it's best to follow the leader's instructions to complete the work task.

In the work environment, the leader's decision-making is a kind of power, and respecting and abiding by the leader's instructions is an important factor in maintaining organizational order and good cooperation.

5.Seek the right trade-offs: In some cases, you may face moral, ethical, or legal considerations. If you feel that the requirements of the leader conflict with these aspects, you may need to seek appropriate trade-offs and may seek advice from management or professional bodies.

Most importantly, actively seek ways to resolve conflicts and maintain good working relationships. This may require flexibility, compromise, and exploring a variety of solutions. Trace circle.