-
It's definitely the United States. Our only advantage is that there are a lot of people.
The Chinese soldiers who trained hard were actually on the real battlefield. The effect is not very large. There's a lot more important stuff. Can't grasp it. I haven't fought in many years. Now for a fight. As you can imagine,
The U.S. has investigated if China and the United States carry out. 60 percent of the United States can win... There should be too many Chinese.
-
This is also asked, of course it is the old beauty!
The American soldier is the best in individual combat ability!
You can't blow it around!
-
If it is equipped with security **, China will definitely not work, but according to the quality of soldiers and the degree of training, the United States will definitely not be able to do it, because they lack the spirit of our Chinese!
-
China's strength! From the physical strength, quality and mental outlook are very strong!
-
Objectively speaking, the physical fitness of the American GIs was good.
-
This is divided into environments, and the results will be different in different environments.
-
The United States, judging by the current situation, is definitely stronger than us, but in a few years it will be different! Because China is one of the fastest growing countries in the world!
-
Germany had the strongest individual combat capabilities.
Reasons: 1. At that time, Germany's human resources were relatively rich, so the supply of soldiers was sufficient.
2. The training time is long, and newly recruited soldiers need to pass 24 weeks (half a year) of training, and to become technical troops, such as armored soldiers, the training time is up to 28 weeks.
3. Germany has a complete reserve system, adopting the practice since the Prussian era, and mixing reservists and active soldiers.
4. After the completion of the training, the recruits were distributed as supplementary troops to the supplementary battalions in the rear areas of the various army groups on the Eastern Front, after 4-6 weeks.
and participate in 1-2 low-intensity combat operations against the guerrillas before they are distributed to the front line.
This is the reason why the German army's individual combat capability ranked first in World War II.
-
China's individual ** strength is obviously insufficient. What's more, China has been developing peacefully for nearly 30 years, and its combat effectiveness will definitely be reduced. The United States is fighting the war on terror every year, and its soldiers have been baptized by fire and have extremely high fighting quality.
Not to mention the American night vision devices, individual soldier radio distributions to individuals. The United States can command every soldier in real time on the battlefield. And American soldiers are capable of fighting at night.
So the gap between China and the United States is huge. The equipment of one person of the US military is more than enough to be distributed to one squad in China. Moreover, individual soldiers in the United States are issued with body armor, while China only has special forces.
-
It's pretty good, it's not bad.
-
Let's rank high!
However, the combat effectiveness of the troops is basically not considered by individual combat, and the current battles are systematic, integrated, multi-functional, and global!
Besides, there is no point in fighting alone!
-
If Germany looks at the performance of the German army in World War II, it is definitely not a cover, and the current German army still continues the fine traditions of the Germanic nation. The military system is reasonable; Soldiers are generally highly educated, basically at the university level; The Germanic peoples of devotion will never lag behind other countries, and the European human abilities are generally stronger; Technical and tactical capabilities were the strength of the German army. The Germans have always been rigorous, so the level of training in the German army is also very high.
The German army's individual soldiers are fully equipped with fierce firepower, and they pay great attention to the cooperation of the arms, especially the mechanized equipment and air-ground cooperative operations, all of which have a high level of literacy, and they also do not ignore melee combat, so their combat effectiveness is very strong. In addition, many of the tactics of special forces operations were pioneered by the German army.
What is the strongest individual combat capability in the world?
The strongest class should be the Scout. The strongest individual combat capability is the scouts, including the scouts and marines in the army special forces forces.
-
It's better not to compare like this - objectively and fairly comment that soldiers of all countries, including China and the United States, have bad races and heroes, and the battle of life and death on the battlefield often stimulates the maximum energy of people, often leading to rapid changes in the war situation, and the heroes under the wrong command are powerless to return to heaven even if they are a hundred, and the bad race in a desperate situation has to resist desperately no matter how afraid of death - here and now with "equipped facilities and physical fitness....and so on" is simply inexplicable - throughout the ages, on the battlefield of bloody battles, a small commander and an ordinary soldier can create earth-shattering achievements, but war is cruel and ruthless, especially heroic and good warriors often really take the lead in sacrifice, which makes people infinitely nostalgic and regretful.
-
Technically speaking, China is not much behind the US military.
The problem is that the United States continues to maintain a state of war, and if there is no war to fight, it will also find a war to fight, so the front-line troops of the US army are equipped with relatively complete individual equipment; And there is no actual war in China, so most of this high-end individual equipment is only embodied in special forces, and ordinary front-line soldiers will not be equipped with or will only be equipped with a part.
This is similar to other equipment in China, if there is too much equipment and there is no war, after a period of time a new one is developed, and the old one has not expired, it will become a chicken rib.
Under normal circumstances, China only produces a part of it, and hands it over to the front-line troops for use, and improves it through the feedback opinions, and when the new generation of equipment is developed, the old ones are almost at the end of their life because of the high intensity of use, and this aspect is both economical and practical, and should be a very good method.
When you become a soldier, you will know that you practice every day, you can't practice if you don't believe it, five kilometers, standing examples, walking forward, etc., you have to shout songs to the party when you eat.
The U.S. economy is currently in the midst of a full-blown financial crisis, which has led to many banks on the verge of collapse due to losses. The banking industry is generally more concerned with balancing its balance sheets, leading to a borrowing crunch or even a drying up of borrowing, the inevitable consequence of which is that the US economy falls into recession. Now that we are entering a recession, the United States** is taking steps to inject capital into the banks and hopefully develop effective policies to end the financial crisis. >>>More
American clothing size imitation sedan chair and Chinese clothing size comparison reference: >>>More
First, the frequency of power generation is different.
The frequency at which electricity is emitted in the United States is 60Hz; The frequency of electricity generated in our country is 50Hz. >>>More
At present, the biggest flaw of China's rule of law, I personally believe that the law is still in the natural stage in many cases, that is, many times it only stays on paper, and does not really penetrate into the hearts of the people, and the people do not regard the law as the highest standard of their own behavior, and do not have a deep sense of identity with the law (let alone as a belief).This is mainly due to the fact that traditional cultural factors and the development of the rule of law are external reasons. >>>More