-
Impossible、1.Italy is too weak.
2.There is no actual evidence that Germany, Italy or Japan possess nuclear weapons**.
3.China, the United States, Russia, and NATO are not vegetarians.
-
Forget about Italy, the Axis powers are used to sell cuteness, and they will join the Allies in the later period. The German Army is strong so it dares to fight, and the Japanese Army is scum, but it has a navy and aviation so it dares to fight.
-
Its leaders were arrogant, unobtrusive and miscalculated the strategic situation, and did not expect the mobilized people to be so brave and invincible, and finally relied on two atomic bombs to solve the problem.
-
For heaven to perish, it must first make it mad!
-
Because she is self-righteous. I thought I was the most powerful. Or too ambitious.
-
The most important thing is to look at the size of the country and determine the degree of need for the army!
It is undeniable that there is also the result of the tough suppression of the United States, (the Pearl Harbor of that year, the United States cannot forget).
Japan is now a puppet state of the United States, a military pawn in Asia!
-
Japan's so-called Self-Defense Forces are in fact an army, and their strength is only stronger than that of Germany and Italy.
-
The Wehrmacht in Germany is called the Wehrmacht in nature.
And then there was the fact that Germany was divided in two, and East and West Germany were in a state of quasi-war, and pure self-defense would not work.
So Germany returned to the defense needs of a normal country.
-
At the end of World War II, MacArthur was the Supreme Commander of the U.S. Occupation Forces in Japan, and it was under his auspices that Japan's pacifist constitution was formulated. This constitution stipulated that Japan would forever renounce the right to wage war. There was no army, only the Japanese Self-Defense Forces were established.
-
Because the United States won't let it, it's as simple as that. The peace constitution is all floating clouds. Although it cannot be called an army to the outside world, it can rank among the top five in the world in defense spending.
-
Italy smiled at us at the time: "Actually, I'm the biggest spy." ”
-
It was difficult to figure out what the situation was at that time, what was the situation in China at that time. How much Chinese land was occupied by Japan at that time. and whether Germany and Japan were willing to fight with this weak country that had just come out of feudalism at that time.
You must know that China's oil and steel at that time were almost zero. And once such a union appeared, do you know how much territory in Southeast Asia was occupied by Britain, France and the United States at that time? The Great Powers would never allow China at that time to fully exploit its war potential.
In their minds, China had better continue to mess up, that the division of the world's colonies was their game, and that countries like China belonged to them. Even if all this did not prevent the three countries from coming together. I'm sorry I'm afraid I'll still lose, but I'm afraid I'm going to find out how much industrial output the United States had at that time.
How huge the navy and army of Britain and France were at that time. Although Italy is as stupid as a pig in North Africa, without Italy as an ally, Germany will undoubtedly have one less way and one more obstacle to the oil fields in North Africa. However, Germany's natural geographical restrictions make it unable to develop comprehensively by land, sea and air, so it cannot cross the English Channel.
As for relying on Japan to make up for China's industrial shortcomings? I'm afraid that this wish is only half fulfilled The US aircraft carrier fleet has already taken Tokyo. And if I'm not mistaken, when Germany attacked Poland, China and Japan were already at war.
-
Let's put aside the justice of World War II, and let's talk about it.
First of all, in the European theater and in the African theater, Germany is unstoppable, this is a fact, but China and Japan are at war, and the warring parties cannot reconcile so quickly and form an alliance, this is the first and second, even if the Sino-Japanese alliance succeeds in meeting with Germany in the Soviet Union and defeating the Soviet Union, after that, the United States will definitely enter the war without asking (the arms and money have also been made, and the largest hostile camp has also been destroyed. After investing a lot of manpower and material resources to invade the Soviet Union, who could stop the American attack? Japan's surprise attack on Pearl Harbor in 41 years, the U.S. military entered the war, less than 3 years, 2 naval battles, 2 atomic bombs, Japan's surrender, and the United States also aided China and Europe.
To deal with Japan, it is enough to rely on the navy. As for the U.S. Army, it can be sent to support the European theater or the African theater (Britain did not fall at this time), and Britain still has a large colony and population, so the Asian theater can be dragged by the colonies, and Britain and the United States will solve the European theater first, and then move to Africa. Under the attack of the countries with the most vast territories and resources, plus the most economically developed countries, who has the better chance of winning?
-
No, at that time, Japan had already launched 918 and invaded the Northeast, and the domestic contradictions were also very fierce.
-
In that case, the United States would have dropped its first nuclear bomb on China. It's so cool that there are so many people. And then throw it at Japan and raze it to the ground.
-
There is no comparison. Industry is not a grade. Japan's industrial level is higher than that of the Czech Republic in Europe, not even as good as Italy, and still compared with Germany? In World War II, relying on deformity to build a navy is a bit large, but can it be compared with Europe?
If nothing else, the shipyards of North America, Great Britain, and Western Europe started together, with an annual output of at least 20 fleet aircraft carriers and a dozen battleships; The aircraft factory will start together, that is, more than 100,000 strategic bombers, and then Germany will have to worry that there are not enough airfields and ports on the front line, and the planes will not be able to stop.
-
Germany, because the Japanese are too conservative in their thinking, the higher the level, the more stubborn their thinking becomes, the hierarchy is strict, and when the top makes mistakes, all the people below are all at fault. Japan has only conquered half of Asia because all Asian countries are relatively weak.
-
This needs to be analyzed comprehensively. As far as war is concerned, the four elements of science and technology, population, energy, and economy are the most important, and Japan has no upper hand. It would probably be better if it could be distributed to the whole territory of Russia.
As far as the time of the war is concerned, the sooner the war starts, the better, otherwise the gap will widen. On the whole, Japan will win 3 percent.
-
Sure Japan loses There is no detailed content Everyone should know it when they think about it.
100 percent Germany wins.
The Soviet Union and Japan fought in the northeast of our country on the eve of World War II, and the Soviet Union won without much effort, but the war between the Soviet Union and Germany was extremely difficult. >>>More
First, Steinberg was not a German piano.
Second, the regular Japanese piano and the German piano are good. >>>More
Beat it. But at a great cost. The United States can be stronger than Germany and Japan because of the huge scale of its industry. >>>More
If that were the case, Japan would have lost much faster. >>>More
<> the saying that Japanese cars are not safe, let alone car lovers and prospective car lovers who are concerned about the car market. I'm afraid that everyone from the ancient old man to the yellow-mouthed child is already familiar with it. As the saying goes, three people become tigers, is the unsafe of Japanese cars a lie deliberately brewed by people with ulterior motives, or is it true, the truth that will not change through the ages? >>>More