Why is it said that in capitalist society, capital has the final say? ”

For example, the social security system in Europe and the United States, which makes Chinese dream of obtaining a green card and the power to distribute social wealth, is in the "capital", please note that it is not the capitalists who have the final say, but the voters who have the final say. Obama is not chosen by the capitalists, it is the choice of the American people, and we respect the choice, and it is the capital that has the final say.

Because without administrative intervention such as socialism, capital is the primary productive force of managers.

First of all, it should be said that the part of China's textbooks studies the part of Marxism that is scientific socialism, so we must look for the answer from Marxism itself. According to the Marxist viewpoint, communism is the highest stage of social development, and socialist society is the primary stage of communism, so socialism is a new thing compared to capitalism. At the present stage, the course of socialist development is still relatively short, and its strength is still relatively weak, while the history of capitalist development is quite long and has reached a relatively mature stage, and it is normal for capitalist countries to be stronger, but capitalism itself has a fatal contradiction -- the contradiction between socialized large-scale production and private ownership of the means of production, and this is the fundamental reason why many developed capitalist countries have suffered from serious economic crises, and capitalism can only try to alleviate this contradiction. But it is impossible to solve this contradiction, and now the capitalist countries are in a stage of relative stability, but this does not mean that they will continue to be strong, and when they reach a certain stage, that contradiction will inevitably erupt and capitalist society will collapse with it.

This is an explanation given in accordance with the principles of Marxism. However, I personally believe that Marxism is not a self-consistent logical system, and although it has indelible and tremendous achievements, there are still many contradictions in it, but China now excessively admires Marxism and regards it as an absolute truth, and textbooks are also written in accordance with Marxist theory. In addition, I personally believe that the level of productive forces in our country at the present stage has not yet reached the stage of socialism, and in fact many of the development processes in our country are no different from those of other capitalist countries, because the law determines that it is impossible for our country to surpass the level of productive forces of socialist countries at once.

I have no intention of exalting or belittling either capitalism or socialism, but I think that this is the law of development, and that our country will inevitably go through the process of development of the productive forces, and we must learn some methods from the advanced capitalist countries. Although there are still various problems in our country, and there is a gap between our strength and the developed capitalist countries, every hero has changed from a rookie, and those developed capitalist countries have also had underdeveloped times, so we should have confidence in our country!

Because socialism is about people helping people, and capitalism is about helping people!!

Capitalism "is a social system based on private ownership of the means of production. The main content is the exploitation of the capitalist class that owns the means of production through the purchase of labor. Under this system, capital, in its various forms, is the main means of production.

The characteristics of capitalist servantism are: production is for the purpose of sales, there is a market for buying and selling labor, and money is used as a medium of exchange; Capitalists own capital, dominate the production process and financial decisions, and economic behavior is aimed at profit; There is competition between capitals, but in essence they tend to monopolize.