What does historical interpretation mean in legal interpretation?

Legal Interpretation. Depending on the method of interpretation.

1. Historical interpretation: Historical interpretation is a legal norm.

The study of the economic, political, cultural, and social historical conditions for the creation, amendment, or abolition of the new legal norms is explained, and the new legal norms are compared and compared with previous similar laws in order to clarify the significance of the law. It emphasizes the use of legislative historical materials to explore the facts, circumstances, and objectives of the legislator when formulating laws to find out the meaning of the legislator.

2. Purpose interpretation: Purpose interpretation refers to the explanation of the law from the purpose interpretation of the law. Interpret legal provisions in accordance with the legislative intent.

3. Ex-officio interpretation: Ex-officio interpretation refers to the explanation of the application of the provision when a certain act should of course be included in the scope of application of the provision according to the existing legal provisions in the absence of express provisions in the law.

4. Sociological interpretation: Sociological interpretation refers to the interpretation and explanation of laws based on social effects and social purposes 5. Constitutional interpretation: Constitutional interpretation refers to a method of interpreting lower-level legal norms in accordance with the Constitution and higher-ranking legal norms.

Read more.

This sentence contains two meanings, interpreting history by law, that is, what can happen in the local area at that time is determined by the objective facts at that time, and the law here cannot be simply understood as the officially promulgated laws and regulations, but the pronoun of objective laws and objective reality; It is better to understand the law by interpreting it in terms of history, that is, the policies and regulations of different historical periods have historical roots, and the implementation of specific laws under specific historical conditions is determined by the history of the time.

The development of the law must be in line with the progress of the times, and at the same time, the direction of the times will also be affected by the laws and policies of the time.

Historical interpretation refers to the ability to rationally analyze and objectively judge historical things on the basis of historical materials and historical understanding.

1. Distinguish between historical facts and interpretations, and be able to understand and evaluate various historical interpretationsTeachers should guide students to realize in concrete study and practice that historians themselves will choose historical materials according to their own needs (although historians try to avoid them) due to the limitations of the times, experience, concepts, and the adequacy of materials, which makes it inevitable that historians will deviate when interpreting history. With this "historian-centered" understanding, students will distinguish between historical facts and interpretations, and boldly look at various historical interpretations, so as to lay a psychological foundation for understanding and evaluation. Different historical interpretations can be divided into two types.

One is that there is no substantive conflict between different historical interpretations. In this case, teachers should not only help students recognize the diversity, complexity, and relativity of historical perspectives as a lens through which history is observed, but also help students define and understand various historical perspectives. The other is the opposition of views, that is, there are discrepancies between different interpretations, which constitute a substantive conflict.

This involves the question of the correctness and depth of the different interpretations. Teachers should guide students to understand the differences in the interpretations and judgments of all parties by analyzing the expositions of different historians on the same historical event, and can explain the essence of each other's contradictions and conflicts from many aspects, such as **, basis, concept, and purpose.

2. Be able to objectively discuss historical events, people and phenomena, and express their own opinions in a reasonable and well-founded mannerIf you want to be objective and reasonable, teachers are required to provide sufficient and appropriate materials and preset a logical line for students' thinking advancement.

3. Being able to find problems from historical appearances, explain the causal relationships between historical things, and find problems from historical appearances is more manifested in the classroom through the efforts of teachers to "problematize teaching materials" and build static teaching materials into problem materials. Fourth, to be able to view and judge the problems in real society and life from a comprehensive, objective, dialectical, and developmental perspectiveIf all history is contemporary history, then the so-called taking history as a mirror means to give birth to historical wisdom through the interpretation of existing history, so as to form and provide a special perspective to cultivate a "comprehensive, objective, dialectical, and development" vision, so as to more effectively examine real life and solve practical problems.

Historical interpretation: With the assistance of philology, linguistics, archaeology, sociology and other disciplines, each historian interprets a historical concept on the basis of his own understanding of historical materials and historical records with the help of unearthed cultural relics and historical records, and makes a major and more accurate functional positioning of historical figures or events. However, in the process of interpretation and **, it is inevitable to integrate personal subjective thoughts.

Historical narrative: Describe a historical event as comprehensively and objectively as possible. Generally, it has the characteristics of seriousness and official documents, without adding any personal understanding, without any emotional bias, without adding any details to process and summarize, and without regular interpretation.

In fact, it is a textual presentation of what happened in the past, and under normal circumstances, we people can understand the "historical facts" of the past through historical narratives.

Historical viewpoint: After being exposed to historical narratives and having a complete and objective understanding of historical events, they can conduct a very subjective "historical interpretation" of historical figures or events, form their own subjective judgments, logical reasoning, and definition of meanings, and form a unique personal idea. Every ordinary person can have his or her own historical point of view, and can make personal judgments and expressions about the history he or she knows, based on his own values.

If historians put forward historical views, such as the views conveyed in many **, most of them use logical argumentation, evidence verification, and deduction to interpret more reasonable and rigorous ideas.

Historical conclusion: On the basis of a comprehensive understanding of historical facts and a multi-faceted absorption of different interpretations and historical viewpoints, the most feasible, scientific and recognized historical exposition is selected to "close the coffin" of a person and historical event. To draw conclusions, there must be arguments and arguments for accompanying Sun Rang, and it is necessary to use logic that is more recognized by the public to reason.

The most plain sentence to summarize is that historical interpretation is to interpret events according to one's own understanding; The historical narrative is a flat and straightforward narrative; A historical perspective is a view of an event; Historical conclusions are those that have been discussed.

This is the interpretation of a historical event, or the interpretation of an event from a historical point of view, because there are some events, he has literary explanations, and there are other interpretations, different angles, to explain a history, in this way, there will be many interpretations of history, and historical interpretation is the root of the pursuit of this time.

Summary. Historical interpretation refers to the determination of the meaning of a law based on historical data. Historical materials refer to materials directly related to the text in addition to legal texts, such as legislative preparatory materials (documents and other materials related to the legislative process), private materials of legislative explanations of legislators (transcripts of conversations, memoirs, diaries, letters, etc.), and even articles published by legislators at that time.

In some cases, the meaning of the law can also be clarified by comparing the new norms with the old norms of the same kind.

Historical interpretation refers to the determination of the meaning of a law based on historical data. Historical materials refer to materials directly related to the text in addition to legal texts, such as legislative preparatory materials (documents and other materials related to the legislative process), private materials of legislative explanations of legislators (transcripts of conversations, memoirs, diaries, letters, etc.), and even articles published by legislators at that time. In some cases, the meaning of the law can also be clarified by comparing the new norms with the old norms of the same kind.

Is the nationwide unified dynasty established by the Mongols a historical explanation?

That's a historical fact.