Do you say materialism is better or idealism?

When you are so sad that you just want to cry, you can make friends with idealism, you will take a placebo, which will make you feel more comfortable, but the problem will not really be solved, the contradiction is still there, the wind and the flag will move, but you can let your heart not move.

When you only want to be enterprising, only think about something, and only want to really solve contradictions, for example, if you are hungry and only want to get food, then only materialism will work.

It's up to you, I'm an idealist.

1. Subjective idealism: It is a philosophical theory. It proposes that the mind of a subject, such as its feelings, experiences, consciousness, concepts, or wills, is the root and basis of the emergence and existence of things in the world, and that everything in the external world is derived from these subjective spirits, and these subjective spirits are manifested.

2. Objective idealism: It is believed that before the emergence of the material world and human beings, there existed independently of an objective spirit (idea, reason, absolute spirit, absolute concept, etc.), and this objective spirit gave rise to the material world in the process of its development. The objective spirit comes first, is the origin of the material world, and is the first nature; The material world is the manifestation and derivative of the objective spirit, which is secondary.

The difference between the two is:

1. Subjective idealism believes that objective things and even the whole world depend on the subjective spirit of man; Objective idealism, on the other hand, holds that the actual material world is the externalization and manifestation of objective spirits (such as God, ideas, absolute spirits, etc.).

2. Subjective idealism exaggerates the role of human consciousness and emphasizes the role of human beings; Objective idealism is the belief that God, God, the Absolute Spirit, and reason work.

3. In subjective idealism and objective idealism, one is the "subjective spirit" and the other is the "objective spirit". "Subjective spirit" mainly refers to the subjective will generated in the human brain, such as thoughts, will, emotions, experiences, etc.; And "objective spirit" refers to "theism" such as God, ideas, and absolute spirits outside the human brain.

The biggest difference is that there are different perspectives on things, one is judged according to objective facts, and the other is judged according to one's own feelings.

Materialism is more focused on seeking the essence of things, while idealism is more focused on one's own feelings about seeing things. Nowadays, it is common to regard scientific data arguments as representatives of materialism, and those religious perspectives as idealistic ones.

The most basic viewpoint of materialism is the primacy of matter and the secondness of consciousness. Emphasizing that the essence of the world is matter, the world is first material and then conscious, matter determines consciousness, and consciousness is the reflection of matter.

Materialism adheres to the viewpoint of proceeding from reality in everything, requires seeking truth from facts, conforms to the objective existence of things, and achieves the unity of subjectivity and objectivity.

In fact, the process of the development of materialism has gone through many stages, from naïve materialism to mechanical materialism, and then to dialectical materialism.

As for our current life, we all agree that the opposite of idealism is materialism, for example, creationism, which explains the origin of human beings, and Darwin's evolution, which is a typical difference between idealism and materialism. Anyway, everyone's point of view is that at first glance the myth is idealistic, and the scientific truth is materialistic.

Consciousness is the first nature, and matter is the second nature.

Idealism holds that the essence of the world is consciousness, and that it is not matter that determines consciousness, but consciousness that determines matter.

There is a very famous story about classic idealism.

Zhongyun in the Altar Sutra: "From time to time, the wind blows and moves. A monk said that the wind moved, and a monk said that the flag moved. There was a lot of talking. Hui Neng Jin said: 'Not the wind, not the flag, the benevolent heart. ”

Translated into the vernacular, it is: The six ancestors of Zen Buddhism Hui Neng went to the Fa Xing Temple in Guangzhou, and there was a wind at that time, and the flags moved. Then two little monks, one said that the wind blew the flag, and the other little monk said that the flag moved, so he knew that there was wind.

The two of them argued with red faces, and then Huineng said, "It's not the wind that moves, it's not the flags that move, it's your heart as a cultivator who is restless."

As a monk, we pay attention to the emptiness of the four major things, and everything is nothing. These two little monks obviously did not reach the realm of Huineng, so they were speechless.

This story is a representation of idealism, as long as you have nothing in your heart, then there is nothing in this world.

In contrast, materialism is still relatively reliable, at least respecting the fact that things exist. Idealism, on the other hand, is difficult to say, and if you can't see anything with your eyes closed, you can say that you have nothing, which is obviously not in line with the objective thinking of our contemporaries.

1. The difference is that they see the world differently. Materialism is closer to the natural sciences, and it likes to explain everything in terms of matter.

Idealism. Closer to philosophy, it likes to explain everything with thought.

2. Materialism is closer to matter, and therefore closer to biological nature, and closer to the satisfaction of human desires. So.

Materialist.

It is those who do not shy away from materialistic desires, and even those who praise materialistic desires. Idealism is closer to the mind and therefore to morality, preferring the totality of the spirit.

3. The most obvious difference is in the perception of "God". God, for not doing much to satisfy people's material desires, so materialists reject God and everything that is beyond the material. And God is very effective in morality, and only when the rationality of morality goes beyond material things can we better teach people not to be too attached to material desires.

Thus, for materialists, God is nothing; For idealists, God is.

The moral law is indispensable.

Matter and consciousness.

What is the question of primarity". While this division is highly misleading, there is a reason for it. By this criterion, then, materialistic thinking is:

If material desires can't be satisfied, why is there morality? So it thinks that matter precedes consciousness. Idealistic thinking is:

Morality is the guarantee of a worthwhile life, and the absence of morality and the absence of matter is worthless and therefore false, so it holds that consciousness (more precisely, the mind) precedes matter.

5. In short, there are many differences, but the core difference is no more so.

Materialism starts from objects.

Idealism starts from oneself.

The essence is to give meaning, one pattern is big, and the other pattern is small.

There is only one difference.

Idealism holds that spirit is primary and matter is secondary, whereas materialism holds that matter is primary and spirit is secondary. Materialism and idealism are two fundamentally opposed philosophical schools. Materialist celebrities include Marx and Engels, and idealistic celebrities include Mozi, Aristotle and Hegel.

The main representatives of idealism include Lu Jiuyuan and Wang Shouren in China, Berkeley in Britain and Fichte in Germany.

Difference Between Materialism and Idealism:

The fundamental view of materialism is to recognize that the essence of the world is matter, that there is matter first and then consciousness in the world, that matter determines consciousness, and consciousness is the reflection of matter. Contrary to materialism, the fundamental view of idealism is that the essence of the world is consciousness, and that it is not matter that determines consciousness, but consciousness that determines matter.

The difference between the fundamental viewpoints of materialism and idealism is formed around the question of the relationship between matter and consciousness. The question of the relationship between matter and consciousness is the basic problem of philosophy, and it is not only a problem that all philosophies must encounter, but also a question that all philosophies must first encounter. Which is the primordial principle of matter and consciousness, and who determines whom of matter and consciousness, is the most important aspect of the fundamental question of philosophy, and the nature of different philosophies in this aspect is different.

The basic problem of philosophy is also the basic problem in practical work, and to truly admit that matter is the origin and that matter determines consciousness, that is, we must insist on proceeding from reality in practical work, so that subjectivity conforms to objectivity.

Personally, I think that subjectively speaking, materialism is more realistic, for example, a loved one is sick, needs a lot of money, and can sustain life for a period of time, maybe 10day, 15days, it may also be 1 year or two years, assuming it will be spent, or it may be 10,000, 500,000 ......But in the end, it didn't cure ......Idealism will think that spending is worth money because it can be earned because the money is gone, and people can't come back when they are gone, materialism will not spend, and she will think that she can't cure it no matter what, and keep the money for a child, or ...... end up emptyThere is no good or bad in this matter, right and wrong, the two sides of the matter often appear, when there are advantages and disadvantages of one thing, it will reflect the character of different people, assuming that it is still an idealism and a materialism two individuals, or meet relatives who are sick, why there are differences, it is because ......of the limited conditions, this money, there is no life, there is no life, if there is no treatment at all, then it will not be cured, because you can't borrow if you want to cure it, you can't borrow it, you can't borrow it, you can't borrow it, you can't borrow itThe ...... of unification of opinions can only be waivedThe other is that there is a lot of money for treatment, even if it is a dime, then there is no need to think about ......Why do the two people have different personalities, it is an idealism and a materialism, and there is no right or wrong in some things, but the ideas are different ......The two personalities of the two subjects can complement each other, but they must be discussed ......Both sides have a ...... to understand each otherIf you can't get through ...... for a dayIdealism is looking for idealism, hahaha divorce doesn't care about family property, he cares if there is a other party in his heart, materialism will think about separation......I can't give him anything more ......Idealistic people will also think that he is willing to give me the family property, and there is still me in my heart, and it is easy to break the thread if I am undecided, which is not a sober ......Materialism will want to separate the family, and when they don't let me do anything, I will be separated like this, right......Personally, I am a materialistic ......It's ...... to be uncertain and have such a characterThe idealistic side is human, and he doesn't care about gains and losses, but he will also think materialistically and rationally about whether he has suffered losses or ......notFor example, when I take a taxi with a friend, I may always choose to be the co-pilot and ask the hungry driver to pay for the position......Some people will always avoid this position ......If you keep meeting him, he always doesn't pay, I idealistically say that I'm not happy, because he is the one who takes advantage of him, but I'm embarrassed to let him buy or whatever, the materialistic idea is that you can't make deep friends or don't pay, or even avoid riding in the car together......This has not been bought is materialism, he can aa.

You can also ask him to be fair with you for one time, but you have to keep asking him to buy ...... that is impossible for him to loseThat's how ......That's all ...... to sayThere are also three examples of the above, ......Personal understanding is not authoritative ......Let's deal with it......The last sentence has to be objectively thought about by the supervisor, that is, now the other party wants to be good for himself, some people envy the freedom of being single, and some people envy the family reunion ......Subjective mutual envy, objective you really change back is not suitable for yourself, single you have to solve the problem of food and clothing by yourself, can you have the economy? If you have a family, you have to think about taking care of the family, there will be conflicts, there will be conflicts, and you will be responsible for hail, are you prepared for this? Think holistically and choose your favorite ......There will be fewer ...... detoursGoodbye