Speaking of boys are poor, girls are rich , what are the following topics?

The main meaning of "raising a boy who is poor, a girl who is rich" and a girl who is "rich" is to take her in and out of various occasions from an early age, broaden her horizons, increase her ability to read the world, and thus greatly enhance her knowledge. Cultivate a noble temperament. In this way, when she is the same age, it is not easy to be captured by all kinds of floating prosperity and vanity.

As for boys, they should be cultivated from an early age with a hard-working, simple, hard-working, and benevolent, righteous, and filial piety. This means, of course, that there is a material restriction on him. Fearless of the harsh living environment and cruel social competition, he can still stand proudly and create a sky of his own.

In the topic of the landlord: 700,000 yuan in compensation (or unclean money) niece. The eldest son only puts his daughter at the same height as money, so it's no wonder that his father is not angry!

The first is the aspect of family affection, the feelings of grandchildren, the feelings of brothers, the feelings of fathers and children.

In fact, affection is also a cost, the emotional investment in the girl and the emotional investment in the son If it is quantified by money, it is the affection for the daughter can be measured by 700,000, in the grandfather's opinion, 700,000 is not enough to afford this feeling.

On the other hand, it is pure interests, money cannot be the standard for measuring family affection, and the poor and the rich still need to be measured by family affection.

The idea of preferring sons over women still exists in China, especially in remote rural areas, and the quality of ethnic groups needs to be further improved.

Obviously, the brother only cares about whether his son is okay, and as for his daughter, it is someone else's anyway, so it is enough to recover the principal!

The loss of a daughter is also sad, and when you have money, you forget the pain of losing your daughter, of course, you forget your love when you see money.

The boy was poor and knew that it was not easy to come by.

Is it less disgusting? Ha ha.

What does this have to do with the fact that boys are poor and girls are rich.

The two don't seem to have much to do with each other.

Girls should be rich and boys should be poor, I agree. The enrichment of girls is reflected in the inner cultivation and quality training. The poor upbringing of boys is reflected in cultivating the spirit of enduring hardships in boys, requiring boys to have a sense of responsibility and responsibility, and teaching them to take responsibility for boys.

I agree with the idea that girls should be rich, and I think that girls should be enriched not materially, but spiritually. Parents should enrich their children's inner life, parents should enrich their children's quality, and parents should cultivate their children into a person with high emotional intelligence. If the girl is a person with high emotional intelligence, she will handle all kinds of relationships well, she will make a lot of friends, she will be able to face all kinds of difficulties, and she will reap the happiness that belongs to her.

Parents should train their children to be a high-quality person, and parents should train their children to become a person with all-round development of morality, intelligence, physical fitness, aesthetics, and labor. Parents should cultivate their children's interests and hobbies, give them correct guidance, and provide them with a healthy environment for growth. Parents should let their children read more books, and girls who have read a lot of books will have an inner temperament that will deeply attract the people around them.

Parents should raise boys poorly, and raising boys poorly does not necessarily reflect material poverty, do not let children feel inferior, and do not let children be inferior to others. The poverty of boys should be reflected in the willingness to let children suffer and let children fail. Parents should cultivate their children's ability to resist setbacks, and manly husbands must be able to bend and stretch, and learn to face everything.

Parents raise boys poorly, and they must be willing to let their children fail, failure is the mother of success, and boys will get up from countless failures before they can succeed.

Boys should learn to be responsible, and parents should raise boys poorly, so they should let boys take responsibility. Boys have to help their parents with household chores from an early age, boys have to learn to be self-reliant, boys have to learn to support themselves, and they have to learn to care for others. Boys should have a tolerant heart from an early age, and parents should be willing to let boys take the initiative to take responsibility and take care of others.

Because of the willingness of their parents and the poverty of their parents, boys will become more self-reliant, self-reliant, and responsible.

Agree with this view. Girl enrichment means creating a rich environment for her daughter, opening her horizons, and having her own thoughts and opinions. The boy's poor support means that he should sharpen his son's will from an early age, so that he can become a person who is not afraid of hardship, tiredness, and responsibility.

It's not about spoiling or suppressing.

I don't agree with this view, and I think that both boys and girls should be provided with the same material foundation and carefully nurtured.

I don't agree, this statement is still essentially a view that men should naturally take on family responsibilities, and women only need to be "chosen", and "having a son in China Construction Bank and a daughter in China Merchants Bank" is the same meaning. The truly correct way of education should be to treat children equally regardless of gender, and to cultivate children's concept of money and financial management ability in a step-by-step and planned way from an early age, so that they can establish a correct concept of wealth from an early age.

I think since it is the older generation who stayed, it naturally has his reason, but it also depends on how to understand, for most parents, raising children in poverty is raising their sons in poverty, not giving them a penny, and letting children experience the suffering of the world is the best.

But you can "be rich" for your daughter, usually use the best food, clothing, housing and transportation within your ability, and only give your daughter money if you have money, and I can't wait to give 10,000 to 10,000.

But is this really what "poor children, rich daughters" really mean? Wouldn't this be too one-sided?

In fact, the "poor raised children" summarized by the older generation refers to raising sons poorly, but they should give a meaningful investment in their lives, while "rich raising daughters" refers to the connotation of cultivating children who should be rich, so that girls can be as good as boys.

The true meaning of a poor son:

Since the beginning of the one-child policy in our country, the status of girls has become higher and higher, even if parents like boys, there is no way, because you only have one daughter.

So since then, the status of women has become higher and higher, and there are more and more strong women in life, which has shaken the status of some men.

But in life, there are still patriarchal parents. They like to spoil their son, they can't wait for the whole family to spoil him together, and they just want to give their son the best.

What these parents didn't expect was that the vast majority of the sons educated in this way were unfilial, because they preferred their parents to pay for themselves, so they had selfish characteristics in their bones, and they were prone to achieve nothing when they grew up.

Therefore, I hope that families with sons can realize that only when they let their children suffer more "hardship" can they become rich people when they grow up, and only when they have responsibilities can they become men.

This is the true meaning of the poor and the rich.

I think that poor and rich are mainly the consciousness of raising a child, and we must not be poor in life, because this will make the child have an inferiority complex, and we should continue to encourage the child, and we should also make the child a better person.

I don't agree with this idea, because it is very unfair to children, and it will make boys very inferior and girls very willful.

Parents can support their children's lives, but they cannot support their children's minds, because this will have a serious impact on their children's lives, and the children's future will also be greatly harmed.

I don't agree with this statement, because I think that when educating children, we must choose the appropriate method, we must teach children according to their aptitude, and pay attention to the fairness of education.