Is it reasonable for the eldest son not to inform other immediate family members when the old man di

The death of an elderly person is not reported to the immediate family.

Unreasonable but not illegal, although there is a contradiction to the point that it is just speculation, there is no real evidence is in vain, if you have any doubts, you can report to the public security organs.

Conduct reporting processing.

Unreasonable, all relatives in the family have the right to know, but it is not illegal not to inform relatives, it has something to do with people's conscience, don't make the old man feel at ease because of the matter between brothers and sisters, this is unfilial, since the old man has passed away, let the old man go quieter!

How old is the old man? How many children do you have? How much income do you have per month?

The old man has a conflict with his eldest son, and he is still willing to live in Guangzhou with his eldest son? Where is the old man's hometown?

Everything has a reason, there are premises, there are conditions, and it cannot be taken out of context.

It's definitely unreasonable, but whether it's illegal or not, I don't feel that there is anything illegal about it, of course, you have to consult a lawyer and a professional professional.

Unreasonableness is inevitable, and if the old man is around, he naturally hopes that those relatives who are related by blood will come and see him. If he. There is knowledge under the spring. , naturally, he also hopes that those relatives can accompany him on his last journey at the funeral.

Maybe it's because of anger. What's wrong? People are nothing more than money, power, and fame. Let's see if there is such a dispute between the eldest son and the old man in this family.

The old man died. As the eldest son, it is obligatory to inform all relatives. and other children.

If it were him, even the other children would not tell him. What's hidden here? Or what purpose might this be?

Such behavior of the eldest son. Whether it's moody. Or from the perspective of filial piety, it is unreasonable.

This is unreasonable, because the old man must have more than one child, and the other siblings also have the right to know, and if you deliberately do not say it, it is difficult not to suspect that there is some ulterior secret.

Unreasonableness is certain, secular ideas are untenable, and will be pointed at, you can sue him, but there must be evidence to sue him.

Unreasonable, only exists at the moral level, cannot be sueped, not illegal but contrary to the old customs of the township.

It's definitely not reasonable! When an elderly person dies, his immediate family has the right to know!

Unreasonable, relatives have the right to know.

Reasonable, after the death of the elderly, all the immediate family members should be aware.

It's definitely not reasonable, how can there be such a thing.

This behaviour has violated the right of other children to know. According to the relevant regulations, participating in the burial of their parents is both an obligation and a right, and at the same time, other children also have the right to express their thoughts and sorrows for their parents, and this right cannot be deprived without authorization. If the old man's son's unauthorized behavior hurts the feelings of the other children, the other children may apply to the court for compensation for moral damages.

Legal analysisAccording to the relevanceLaws and RegulationsAfter the commencement of the inheritance, the heirs are not necessarily at the place of inheritance, therefore, the heirs at the place of inheritance shall be responsible for notifying the other heirs and executors of the fact that the heirs died and the inheritance began. If none of the legal heirs knows the fact of the decedent's death, or if the heirs are incapable of knowing the decedent's death but cannot be notified, the decedent's former unit or the residents' committee or villagers' committee of the place of residence shall be responsible for notifying the deceased. This provision of the law is an obligation that a citizen, unit, or organization should fulfill, and if an heir intentionally conceals the news of the death of the deceased, he or she shall be punished for failing to fulfill his or her legal obligations.

When a people's court hears an inheritance case, if it knows that there is an heir but is unable to notify it, when dividing the property, it shall retain the inheritance that should be inherited and determine the custodian or custodian unit of the estate. Notification of inheritance is a procedure for the transfer of an estate. Only when it is known that the transfer of the estate has begun can the heirs make an expression of acceptance or renunciation of the inheritance, and the legatee can make an expression of granting or renunciating the bequest, so that the will made by the decedent can be executed.

Legal basisArticle 1150 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China After the commencement of inheritance, the heirs who know that the decedent has died shall promptly notify the other heirs and the executor. Where none of the heirs knows of the decedent's death or is unable to notify the decedent's death, the residents' committee or villagers' committee of the decedent's unit or domicile is responsible for notifying them.

Because the other children did not fulfill their obligation to support the elderly. When the old man died, the son, who had fulfilled his obligations, was very angry and did not notify the other children, which was not illegal. It can only be said that this son is not considerate.

If you don't inform the other children, outsiders will laugh at them, and it also shows that the sisters in the family are not united with each other. Without parents as a bond, the children of this family will become strangers in the future. If you have children at home, it also plays a negative role in educating children.

So a lot of things are going to pass on face, and this son should inform the other siblings.

Hello, this situation is against the law.

Article 13 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China clearly stipulates that the State shall protect citizens' private property rights and inheritance rights in accordance with the law.

Unfilial children still have the right to inherit and the right to know.

Ask what the consequences are.

Ask the most serious questions.

The most serious question is that the defendant pays the costs of the lawsuit and receives his share of the inheritance, and the question is whether there is no criminal law or a high amount of damages.

The law does not stipulate such details, but if the other children have not severed the relationship with the elderly or it is stated in the old man's will, no matter what they think of them, they should still be told, so as to ensure the right of other children to know, so as not to be passive in reason and law.

Hope it helps!

When an elderly person dies, it stands to reason that they should tell their children, but if these children have no one to care about them during the old man's illness, and they have not visited the elderly once, they can not tell them. But whether they are filial or not, they have the right to inherit, unless the old man makes a will and the property is not given to those unfilial children.

The old man died in his son's house, and it was normal limb grinding!

As an insurance for the elderly, raising children to prevent old age is a traditional calendar.

It's normal to die in your son's house!

No, you cannot. It is an illegal act to fail to notify the children of the death of a loved one, depriving other children of their right to pay their respects. The right to pay tribute is also a type of human rights, and human rights should be protected.

Article 1150 of the Civil Code: After the commencement of inheritance, the heirs who know that the decedent has died shall promptly notify the other heirs and the executor. Where none of the heirs knows of the decedent's death or knows of the decedent's death and cannot be notified, the residents' committee or villagers' committee of the decedent's former unit or domicile is to be informed of the jury notice.

Legal basis: Article 1150 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China After the commencement of inheritance, the heirs who know that the decedent has died shall promptly notify the other heirs and the executor. Where no one among the heirs knows of the decedent's death or knows the decedent's death but cannot be notified, the residents' committee or villagers' committee of the unit or domicile where the decedent worked before his death is concerned.

Summary. Hello <>

1. It is an illegal act for the old man's son not to tell the old man's daughter about the offense, and it is an illegal act for the relatives to not notify their children, depriving the other children of their rights. 2. Ji dian rights are also a kind of human rights, and human rights should be protected. 3. After the commencement of inheritance, the heirs who know the decedent Si Wang should promptly notify the other heirs and executors, because the right of inheritance belongs to the legal rights enjoyed by inheritance and no one can take it away.

Hello <>

When the old man died, did the son not tell the old man's daughter to break the law?

Hello <>

The old man's son did not tell the old man's daughter that he had broken the law, and 1. It was an illegal act for the relatives to not inform their son, Huaiqing Duannu, and deprived the other children of their rights. 2. The sale of the right to do so is also a type of human rights, and human rights should be protected. 3. After the commencement of inheritance, the heirs who know the decedent Si Wang should promptly notify the other heirs and executors, because the right of inheritance belongs to the legal rights enjoyed by inheritance and no one can take it away.

Hello <>

The basis given from a legal point of view is as follows: Article 1150 of the Civil Code After the commencement of inheritance, the heirs who know the decedent Sio Wang shall promptly notify the other heirs and executors. If none of the heirs knows about the decedent Siwang or knows that the decedent Siwang is dead and cannot be notified, the residents' committee or villagers' committee of the unit to which the deceased worked before his death or the place where the deceased is domiciled shall be responsible for notifying.

Hello <>

You can tell me about your situation, dear.