-
I think the latter may be the first thing to think, but if you think about it, the former is even more terrifying.
I think it's the former, there are actually many kinds of people killed, we mostly assume that it is a sudden situation, that is, the process of being killed is short, if it is a pistol through the head it will be faster, and you will indeed feel extremely frightened in the moment before death, but relatively speaking, the pain is still short-lived.
Starving to death is different, it doesn't sound as harsh as being killed, but in fact, starvation is a long period of time, you watch your life continue to fade, endure increasing pain but can't die immediately and get relief, this kind of pain of not being able to survive and die is really an endless hell.
-
If you really have no love for life, it's the same. Actually, it's the same for some people. The result is the same.
If you say that people feel the most frightened when they face it, it's the former. The latter is a matter of moments, and the pain is only a moment. And the latter it is a long-term torture, the feeling of an empty stomach and unconsciousness, which can make people lose their minds.
So the former is the "death of the wild" and the latter is the "death of the intellect".
-
Handsome guy, I've already had two of you in your question, what a coincidence.
Whether it's the former or the latter, the answer to the table, to be absolutely sure, is speculation.
When you die, fear will have different effects on different people, since they are all deaths, why do you feel a little more afraid in a cruel way? Fear is just the guess of us living people when we die, and I don't remember a classic quote from Tagore: "Life is like the splendor of summer flowers, and death is like the quiet beauty of autumn leaves."
In fact, no one can say whether it is fear or happiness when you die!!
-
Latter. The former is a longer process with room for mitigation. The latter is a short, painful process.
Which one do you say people will be afraid of?
-
How to say, no one will behave differently, but most of the people who can't see it will collapse, and the few will cherish the rest of the day, so I suggest that everyone kill the first one who collapses, so that there will be fewer people who have regrets, you know, the people who collapse are terrible, they are crazy, so it is recommended to kill the people who collapse, and also reduce the sins of the collapsers.
-
When a man is about to die, what is there to fear? Is it useful to be afraid in the face of such a situation? People will die sooner or later, what is there to be afraid of. Hades wants you to die on the third watch, and he won't keep anyone until the fifth watch. Life and death are predetermined.
-
Death refers to the loss of life, the termination of life, and is the opposite of survival.
Philosophically speaking, death is the end of life, and the loss of all the attributes that originally sustained its existence (survival), irreversibly and permanently.
A shocking study in the United States has shown that when a human heart stops beating, the brain continues to function. In other words, the human brain becomes aware of the fact that it is dead.
-
To put it simply, the death of philosophy is:
When you don't think you're alive.
-
Death couldn't be simpler. Everything in the universe is everywhere, and even if the sun shines on the earth for hundreds of millions of years, today's sun is by no means yesterday's sun. Today's Earth is not yesterday's Earth. In the same way, what I am today is not who I was yesterday.
-
Death is that everything is made up of molecules, and when you die, you become molecules and merge into something else, and you can see Sophie's world for the answer.
-
Philosophically, the death of an individual does not represent the end of things. The DAO instance died, but within it was his legacy
Problems, relationships, and so on have not disappeared, but have been inherited or carved up. In religion there is a saying of reincarnation, but in fact in philosophy, this "reincarnation" is certain. In convergent evolution, it is inevitable that similar environments will produce similar-looking organisms.
People are the same, similar environments, similar education, similar experiences, it is likely that two similar lives will occur.
-
It is from the perspective of modern Western compound science to treat life and death, that is, the loss of life function.
People cannot live forever, they will die, it is an objective change, it does not transfer with the will of people, and it embodies the principle of materialism; Death is a natural law, and life and death are a pair of contradictions, which run through the principle of materialist dialectics.
Death is a change, a change and movement of internal structure.
-
Philosophy holds that death is a liberation, an objective law.
-
There is no death just in different ways, one in reality and one in the virtual world.
-
Death is a complex and diverse issue, not only involving the fields of biodestructural, medicine, psychology, etc., but also an important issue in philosophy. As a philosophical question, the meaning and value behind death can push us to think about and understand the nature of life and the meaning of human existence. Here are some philosophical questions about death:
1.What is the nature of death? Is it the decay of the body, the demise of the mind, or the disappearance of the perception of the self?
2.Does death mean eternal unconsciousness and non-existence?
3.Does death mean that the meaning of our lives has been denied?
4.Does death have to do with the concepts of ultimate truth, liberation, and transcendence?
5.What impact does death have on our outlook on life and values?
These questions can make people think more deeply about their own lives and the value of human existence, as well as the changes that death brings to our outlook on life and values. Therefore, death as a philosophical question is indeed necessary.
The main illustration of the existence of the soul lies in the fact that Descartes once said, "If you can imagine that one thing separates into two things, then it must be separated into two things." No one has been able to cite a counter-example to this statement, and certainly no one has been able to prove it true. So the core of the existence of the soul is really an idealist question, and when you become aware of that kind of thing, then from that point on, it exists. >>>More
Laws of Mind and Laws of Nature.
There should be an environment for free discussion.
I remember many years ago, I read a book called "Looking at the Three Kingdoms: Talking about Philosophy", in which the stories of the Three Kingdoms are told paragraph by paragraph, and at the same time, combined with the philosophical ideas contained in the stories, and gave the readers a detailed analysis and how the ancients applied abstract philosophical principles to social activities. >>>More
Philosophy and worldview are both understandings and perceptions of the world, but they differ in the way and process by which they are formed. >>>More