Is Yao Minggang nailed on the truth, evidence, facts and empirical methods???????????????????

Zhang Mingji, the head of Yao's team, has come forward to refute the rumors that 16 steel nails are impossible.

Zhang Mingji, head of Yao Ming's brokerage team "Yao Zhi Team", denied this statement in an interview with a reporter from Chengdu Business Daily. He told a reporter from Chengdu Business Daily that Yao Ming implanted a small number of steel nails in two surgeries, and the specific number was Yao Ming's own admission that "4 steel nails were implanted in 3 years". Due to last year's surgery on his left foot, one more was removed, and only three steel nails remain in Yao Ming's left foot.

At the same time, Zhang Mingji also confirmed to a reporter from Chengdu Business Daily for the first time that these three steel nails "will never be taken out" and will always accompany Yao Ming's career.

Yao Ming had 4 steel nails implanted in 3 years.

According to Zhang Mingji's introduction, "Yao Ming only implanted steel nails in two surgeries". In April 2006, Yao Ming was pushed onto the operating table for the third time in his life due to a fracture of the fifth metatarsal of his left foot, and a steel nail was implanted in the fracture of his left foot for the first time. Before the 2008 Beijing Olympics, he was once again on the operating table due to a fracture in the scaphoid bone of his left ankle, and this time the surgeon implanted him with three steel nails at once in three hours of surgery.

Yao Ming was particularly impressed by this operation, and he once summarized his "injury history" in an interview with "3 years, the 4th operation, the 4th steel nail", and when asked what the 4 steel nails feel in the body, Yao Ming can still say bitterly, "It makes no difference if he has 3 or 2 steel nails." They are all buried in the bones, and they will not rub against the **, muscles, and there is no special feeling. ”

It wasn't until last year that Yao Ming was injured again in the playoffs, and he had to undergo the biggest and most important surgery of his career. In the surgery to repair the scaphoid bone in Yao Ming's left ankle, the Rocket team doctor chose to remove a steel nail that had been implanted and then re-autologous bone graft ...... the scaphoid crackUntil now, Yao Ming is still in the recovery period of this operation**. A perfect comeback for the new season has become the only goal he is trying to strive for.

Yao Ming had 4 steel nails implanted in 3 years.

Last year, I had surgery on my left foot and I had another one, and now I have three.

Positivism is a kind of positivism based on"Practical verification"Philosophical ideas at the center. Broadly speaking, any kind of philosophical system that requires only knowledge of empirical material and rejects a priori or metaphysical speculation is positivism. Positivism in a narrow sense refers to the philosophy of the French philosopher Auguste Comte.

This article focuses on positivism in the narrow sense.

Since it is the end of the course, it is necessary to jump out of the book and combine it with reality (reality), jump out of pure theory and combine it with practice (including scientific experiments).

There is no need to say too much about the purpose of empirical evidence.

Due to the particularity of China, it is often necessary to intersperse it in combination with the political theories of politicians, and it is recommended to cite them appropriately and in a low-key manner.

Babble, don't laugh ha.

As for positivism, it is better to understand it by removing the word ism, and that is its essence.

With regard to the empirical method, the essence of the empirical method is to remove the word "empirical".

Combining these two points is the essence of natural dialectics!

Those who study science and engineering should study Marxist philosophy for practical purposes in order to help the study and practice of science. It is strange that the bourgeoisie who goes to study non-practical pseudo-philosophical bluffs does not mess up people's thinking. These university professors, pretending to be knowledgeable, do not know how to mislead people's children?

True sin too.

You must be a friend of Beigonggong...

1 All Chapter VI Evidence.

Article 63: There are the following types of evidence:

1) Documentary evidence; 2) physical evidence;

3) audio-visual materials;

4) witness testimony;

5) the statements of the parties;

6) Appraisal conclusions;

7) Inquest records.

The above evidence must be verified as true before it can be used as the basis for determining the facts.

Article 70: All units and individuals who know the circumstances of a case have the obligation to appear in court to testify. The responsible person of the relevant unit shall support the witnesses in testifying. Where witnesses truly have difficulties and are unable to appear in court, they may submit written testimony with the permission of the people's court.

A person who cannot express his will correctly cannot testify.

Article 71: People's courts shall review and determine whether a party's statements can be used as a basis for determining facts in conjunction with other evidence in the case.

Where the parties refuse to make statements, it does not impact the people's court's determination of the facts of the case on the basis of evidence.

Article 72: Where people's courts find that an evaluation is necessary on specialized issues, they shall have it submitted to the legally-prescribed evaluation department for evaluation; Where there is no legally-prescribed appraisal department, the appraisal department designated by the people's court is to conduct an evaluation.

The evaluation department and the evaluators designated by it have the right to learn about the case materials needed to conduct the evaluation, and when necessary, may question the parties and witnesses.

The appraisal department and the evaluator shall submit a written appraisal conclusion and sign or affix a seal to the appraisal document. Where evaluators make evaluations, the unit to which the evaluators belong shall affix a seal to prove the evaluators' identity.

That is to say, the facts you want to prove, whether the facts you state or not, you must have something to prove, for example, there is an IOU for the loan, there is a contract for the agreement, there are witnesses present in the conversation, etc., and there must be strong proof that these past facts can be reproduced in the current situation, and it is convincing and convincing, and it can make people believe, that's all. We are studying law, and we hope you are satisfied.

It is not necessary to glue and glue, and it is good to be neat when nailing at the end, but you can't use staples, because the certificate has a long storage period, and the iron thing is easy to rust and destroy the certificate. Therefore, special attention should be paid to this when binding vouchers. If the original voucher is nailed, it should also be taken out.

I remember when I was in school, my teacher talked about it, and I also learned how to bind beautifully.

You don't have to do anything, you're going to bind it anyway, it doesn't matter.

It's best not to use a stapler, otherwise you won't be able to bind it in the end, your financial manager is estimated to let you glue it for the convenience and beauty of the binding in the future, and our company also uses glue to glue. Hehe.

Anyway, it's going to be bound, whatever method you use.

You don't need to stick it, you just need to be neat and beautiful, which financial manager let you do it? Is.

The analysis of evidence generally needs to analyze the veracity, legitimacy, and relevance of the evidence.

The first of the evidence refers to, but is not limited to, the legitimacy of the evidence.

If the evidence can prove that the acquisition is unlawful, then the evidence cannot be used as the basis for determining the case, unless the prosecution has new evidence that can prove that the evidence is lawful.

The analysis of evidence should generally be analyzed from three aspects: its authenticity, legitimacy, and relevance.

The veracity of evidence is not an exact legal concept, it should refer to the authenticity and legitimacy of evidence.

Only when the evidence is authentic, legal, and relevant can it be used as the basis for determining the case.

Truthfulness, legitimacy, and objectivity. This is the chain of evidence.

How is it possible to dig a hole in Liaoning? Municipalities rarely merge with surrounding prefecture-level cities, and are united with nearby counties. It is not necessarily good to be directly under the central government, and it is difficult for Chongqing's economy to surpass that of Guangzhou and Shenzhen.

Fake, some works produced in the dreams of Comrade YY!

Is there any basis for that? Where did the information come from?!!

Where did you pick this? There is no basis for it.