When two people have a conflict, what is the act of one party snatching the other half of the party

There was a conflict between the two, one party snatched the other party's things, it is a robbery, it is best to call the police to deal with it, and the police will help you deal with this matter.

When two people have a conflict, one party must be illegal to snatch the other party's things, which is a robbery.

When the two clashed, one party snatched the other's things, what kind of behavior did it belong to?

This behavior is first and foremost irrational. You can't rob other people's things, if other people's things are more valuable, they can sue you for illegal possession.

If you snatch a person's things, it is actually no different from a thief, in fact, such a situation can basically be reported to the police.

The two clashed, one pointed and the other snatched something. It should be a robbery.

If two people have a conflict, and one party snatches the other person's things, I think it's a kind of snatching, or that's it.

When two people have a conflict, they are actually angry, and if you don't get angry in a few days, you will be reconciled, don't get angry for a little thing, talent is the most important thing, and things are not important.

If there is a conflict between the two people, and one party steals the other party's things, well, if it involves significant money, in fact, you can call the police, if it is just some physical conflict, you can find someone to mediate, and ask him to ask for an apology or moral compensation.

Report the crime, report that the thing was violently robbed. Depending on the specific circumstances, it may be judged as a robbery. It is up to the court to decide.

Let's see what the relationship between these two people is. If it's a family, it's domestic violence. If you don't know people, it's tantamount to robbery.

Since two people have a conflict and quarrel, it is actually not an illegal act for two parties to snatch the other party's things, after all, two people are also people who have something to do with each other.

This situation should be considered a robbery, because it was forcibly snatched.

Measuring the house Fu'an happens. Whoever snatches the other party's things from the other. So call the police quickly, if the police are timely. Arrangement, you can also deal with this matter, if the police are not timely, it will be more serious with me.

Judging from your description, the two had a conflict, and one party forcibly snatched the other party's things, which is already a crime. It should be an act of robbery. Because it was taken without the consent of the other party.

It's just a meaningless act of two people having a conflict, and there is no illegal behavior.

What kind of behavior is it? This kind of behavior is considered robbery.

When two people have a conflict, what kind of behavior does one party reward and the other party steals something? That's what it's called smashing and looting.

I think this behavior should be immoral, normal people don't.

My cousin found that as soon as the token was released, the general thing would go well and not carry the book one, what is that kind of fine. Bandits.

When the two had a conflict, on the one hand, snatching something on the other hand was not an act, and it was a crime of forcibly seizing someone else's property.

When two people clash, one party snatches the other party's things, which is not an act, this act is an act of robbery.

If picking quarrels and provoking troubles has already been involved, the public security organs may be requested to detain and fine them in accordance with the provisions of Article 43 of the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, and if they cause minor injuries to the injured party, they may be investigated for the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles and bear criminal responsibility.

has been suspected of the crime of assembling a crowd to fight. Report the case to the public security organs. If they do not deal with it, they may file an administrative lawsuit against the local public security organ for administrative inaction.

Article 292: [Crime of Assembling a Crowd to Fight] Those who assemble a crowd to fight shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or controlled release for the ringleaders and others who actively participate; In any of the following circumstances, the ringleaders and others who actively participate are to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years:

1) Gathering crowds to fight multiple times;

2) Gathering a crowd to brawl with a large number of people, a large scale, and a vile social impact;

3) Gathering crowds to fight in public places or on major traffic arteries, causing serious disruption of social order;

4) Armed crowds to fight.

Where a crowd is assembled to fight, causing serious injury or death, it is to be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of articles 234 and 232 of this Law.

What are your legitimate rights and interests? Does it mean to compensate, or is it just an "explanation" like "Qiu Ju's Lawsuit"?

As a police station, in the face of this situation, it can only mediate between the two parties. Is your matter a physical altercation caused by a civil dispute, or is it a civil dispute? The police station can only mediate in the face of civil disputes.

If you feel that the mediation of the police station is not satisfactory to you, then you can apply to the higher unit (public security bureau) for reconsideration, or directly file a civil lawsuit against the other party.

Criminal law is modest, and not everything has to rise to the level of criminal law. Moreover, the legal definition of picking quarrels and provoking troubles and assaulting others is very strict, and if the slightest conflict has to start the procedure of public security administration and punishment, then the whole of China's detention centers will be full.

The crime of intentional injury is to be paid for legal responsibility.

First of all, you can't act recklessly when you are angry, you must learn to control your emotions, otherwise you will cause irreparable mistakes to others and yourself. If the injury is not serious, it is better to keep it private, so that there will be no stain on the file.

The standards for filing and punishing public security organs generally refer to two, one is the relevant provisions in the "Regulations on the Administration of Public Security", and the other is the "Criminal Law", the former is used to deal with some situations where the illegal acts are not serious, it is not as good as the two parties fighting and brawling resulting in a slight injury to one party, and if one party is slightly injured in the course of the fight, criminal responsibility should be investigated. In this process, the public security organs and the procuratorate will generally look at the facts of the case, and if it is only an ordinary fight due to a dispute, it will be difficult for the public prosecution to enter the public prosecution procedure if it is only a minor injury. Only those who intentionally cause more than minor injuries to others will be investigated for criminal responsibility, that is, the procuratorate will initiate a public prosecution and the court will try it, and the settlement between the parties may also lead to the court lifting the criminal punishment of the victim.

In a fight, no one can be exempted from responsibility, but only if the degree of injury of the other party constitutes a minor injury or above, he will bear criminal responsibility, and legitimate defense is limited and strictly standard.

Not necessarily, the first shot will not necessarily seriously hurt the other party, if it is just a tentative teasing, the shot will not be too heavy!

If the other party does it first, you can't be held fully responsible

Responsibilities are not based on the severity of the injury.

It's not about looking at that one first.

It is recommended that you entrust a lawyer to investigate the situation and then deal with it in a timely manner, otherwise it will be more troublesome in the future! If necessary

To** can dao with this lawyer (Rong County|Zigong|Chengdu|Sichuan|Chinese lawyer) to fight for your best interests. If you are in a hurry, you can call ** to consult the lawyer's 13219631806 (24 years of legal work experience, worked in the Commission for Discipline Inspection, the Supervision Bureau, and has been engaged in civil service work in state organs for 30 years).

There are clear legal standards for controlled knives: the tip of the knife is less than 60 degrees but the blade length is more than 15cm, the tip is greater than 60 degrees but the blade length is more than 22cm, or there is a blood groove, double-edged, multi-edged, self-locking device, and those that meet one of the items are considered controlled knives.

In addition, knives should not be carried in public places.

If it is a controlled knife, it will face public security administrative penalties.

If you bring an ordinary fruit knife to school, it will be confiscated first, and then the parents will be invited.

If you threaten your classmates with a knife, according to the situation at the time, the more serious ones are already picking quarrels and provoking trouble, malicious campus bullying, and you will face parents, psychological counseling, suspension, withdrawal, or criminal detention after the public security bureau intervenes.

There was a conflict between classmates, and one party took out a fruit knife and threatened, but did not hurt the other. does not cause a crime. But the law has been broken.

Detention and education should be given. Due to the large Chinese population. The public security department has complicated matters.

The public security department cannot manage this situation. The general school will deal with it.

If it does not cause serious consequences, it will not be punished, but the head teacher of the school will criticize the education.

He should be punished, at least a fine of 200 yuan, and detained for about 7 days, so that he knows that what he has done has violated the law and should be taken as a warning.

Criticism of education is a serious detention fine.

This is a tort and you can bring a civil action

I want to ask how it was dealt with later?