What do you think of the lawyer s interpretation of the two boys suffocation case in the car?

I think the lawyer's statement is very correct, the owner's car is placed in his yard, whether it is locked or not, it is the freedom of the car owner, and the child enters the car without permission and is locked and causes suffocation and death is an accident, and it is not the owner's business at all. I sympathize with the grief of parents who lost their two children, but no matter how sad they are, they can't slander people at will, and the parents themselves are unreasonable, and it is very immoral to use the death of the child to blackmail the owner of the car to compensate. To put it mildly, the owner's car is estimated to be unable to drive in the future because two people died, so can he also ask his parents for compensation?

The owner didn't do this, because he knew that the incident itself was an accident, and the loss of the two children was heart-wrenching enough, and asking for compensation at this time would undoubtedly add insult to injury.

The owner also had a kinship with the parent, and after the incident, he also went to the parents' home to offer condolences, and the owner did a good job. I hope that parents will not forget their conscience while being sad and grieving.

01: Two children enter the car to play without permissionOn June 22, two children in Guangzhou died of dehydration and suffocation because they had entered someone else's car without permission and were locked in a broken car. The children are still very young, for this kind of thing did not know how to save themselves, no one heard the call for help, the weather in Guangzhou was in high temperatures, in the closed environment in the car children dehydrated and suffocated, and finally both died.

Some people will say that if the car door is locked well, the child will not be able to enter at all, and the car owner is to blame for not locking his car door! But the fact is that the car is parked in the yard of the owner's house, and it does not belong to a public place, so whether it is locked or not, no one else has the right to ask. The child is young and playful, wandering around, trying to open the door when he sees a car, but he didn't expect it to be really unlocked, so he went in to play, and accidentally pressed the hollow door lock in the car, so it was locked.

02: The child disappeared and the parents did not look for it in timeThe child was locked in the car for four or five hours, and the child's parents did not come out to look for it at that time, which was actually due to the lack of parental supervisionAlthough it is normal for children to play everywhere in the same village, normal parents will not let their children go home for hours, which is really wrong for parents. If parents can keep an eye on their children, this will not happen, or if they look for the child in time for an hour after the child disappears, and maybe find the child trapped in the car.

So when something like this happens to a child, isn't the biggest responsibility for the parents not the parents?

The law is also very fair and just, not the responsibility of the car owner, then he does not need to bear it, even if the parents are resentful of the car owner and want him to compensate, there is no way, because this matter is really not the car owner's business. If the owner of the car is responsible for this matter in the end, I will really cry out for the owner of the car, I didn't do anything, two people died in the car for no reason, the car was scrapped, not to mention, and I would be asked for compensation.

This matter is not only a matter of the owner's lack of responsibility, but also the law should investigate the child's guardian for failing to fulfill his guardianship responsibility. Is it not legally responsible for the death of the ward caused by the failure to fulfill the guardianship obligation? There is a lot of news of children drowning at this time of year, what about the responsibilities of guardians?

For parents of children, guardianship is not only a right, but also an obligation.

Parents should be punished, guardianship is also an obligation, do not take good care of the child, cause the death of the child, is there no need to recover the legal responsibility at all? I've seen a few news stories where the biological parents forgot their child in the car and died. I want to say, if it is a stepfather and stepmother, will others suspect that it is intentional?

If someone dies because of negligence but does not have to bear any legal responsibility, will it be exploited by someone with a heart? The situation of the owner of this article is different, his car is parked in his own home, the lock is his own business, should not pay responsibility, unlike what fish pond, deep well, although it is his own home, but it may be dangerous foresight, so it must do a good job of safety protection. The car is parked in your own home, and common sense is safe.

And young children (four or five years old is the age when they need adult care) ran in and died because their parents were not optimistic, and their parents were responsible. And the owner should also be compensated.

I just want to ask those who think that the owner of the car should be responsible, and who should pay compensation to those who drown every year.

The owner is wronged! Do you have to lose money if your car is scrapped? It doesn't make sense! Encourage unhealthy tendencies!

If this is reversed, the first thing that should be investigated is the responsibility of the child's parents, that is, the guardians. If you don't have the ability to take care of them, don't give birth to them. If you can't educate them, don't raise them. How embarrassed to say that he is the injured party, and the real victim is the child.

Parents are not optimistic about their children, and they blame people for not locking their cars, if you are in the river, do you want to find the country to accompany you? Is.

The owner of the car has no responsibility, the parent's supervision obligation has not been fulfilled, and such a small child cannot leave the parent's sight for too long! Although the child is gone, we can understand the heartache of parents! But the owner can't be blamed.

The reason is simple, if parents think that the car is not locked in their yard, it is a danger to their children. So if a person sneaks into your house and goes to the kitchen to take a kitchen knife and injures himself, is the law going to hold the homeowner responsible for not hiding the kitchen knife in a place where people can't find it? First of all, the child trespasses into the private area of someone else's house, and the behavior is done by the child himself.

Please do not confuse the law with human feelings.

My money was put in a bag and was stolen, and after the thief was caught, the lawyer said that I was also responsible: because why don't you keep the money in the bank, if you keep it in the bank, the thief can't steal it.

The law is the law, not the mud.

It is precisely the failure of parents to fulfill their guardianship obligations that really lead to the vicious consequences, and this should be prosecuted.

In this case, the car owner violated that law, and if the car owner is not responsible, what basis is there for it. Speaking as a lawyer, it is necessary to analyze it from the perspective of changing careers. If you want to file a case, there is still a lot of controversy about which law to apply, and the best solution is mediation.

The lawyer is not clear about the responsibility, and will only be with the mud, just because of the bad publicity, some people have the problem of finding others in advance, as long as they make trouble, they can have money to compensate, even in court, the lawyer will ask for appropriate compensation out of humanitarianism, and if it goes on like this, the consequences are unimaginable.

There's nothing to discuss, what kind of robber logic is it to enter someone else's legal private space without permission, and then let the owner take responsibility if something happens? Although I don't own a car, I absolutely support that the owner of the car is not only not responsible, but also deserves compensation from the child's family. Outsiders died in my car, how dare the car drive?

If an outsider dies in his own home, how dare he live in the house?

Aren't the families of children thinking too much? If your child falls to death on someone else's roof, will the landlord compensate you?

At the legal level, the owner of the car is not responsible, but from the reasonable side, a certain amount of compensation can be given instead of compensation, and the compensation is not mandatory, and it all depends on the willingness of the car owner.

I think that the parents of the child are fully responsible, and they can't compensate, and if they compensate from the perspective of human feelings, it will only encourage evil spirits, and in the future, as long as someone dies, whether it is right or wrong, they will try their best to claim compensation.

I can't ask for a car. After all, there were people in the car. It's so unlucky.

Don't be responsible, you should be held accountable, at least this car can't be used.

A lot of people talk about human feelings! How do you count that person's car? How to count the house! Especially in the Liangguang area, the car and the house are ruined!

Standing on the child's side, the child's parents should be sentenced to prison, and they are sad that their guardianship is not in place. Standing on the owner's side, it is very good not to sue the child's parents for compensation (this car is like a house with an unnatural death, it can't be sold at all, and it is taboo to drive it yourself).

You should give way to non-motorized lanes for cyclists, draw parking space lines on the top of motorized lanes, and give way to non-motorized lanes.

Turn. Car owners can also hold their children's parents accountable. Due to their failure to fulfill their guardianship responsibilities.

Let the children who should not be out of sight get into the yards of other people's homes and into other people's cars, bringing double economic and mental harm to others. Claim for car damage and moral damage.

The owner of the car still has to take proper care of the deceased's parents, how painful the child is, if the deceased's parents feel that they are not very acceptable to deal with the result, they may go the wrong way, they should be ruined to avoid disasters, after all, people's hearts are unpredictable. Personal opinion.

Nowadays, people are able to make false accusations, and lawyers help people to rot in order to increase their business.

If you are wrong, you are playing at your house, why don't you move out, it shows that you approve of playing in your house, and you are more or less responsible for accidents.

Lawyers are trying to make money and talk about some crooked reasoning, and put their own courtyard, their own home, and their own car in their own courtyard. When a child is two years old, being a parent is a critical period of care, and it should be the responsibility of the child's parents to stay out of sight.

Regarding the case, a lawyer saidRegardless of whether criminal or civil liability is based on whether the owner's failure to lock the door constitutes "negligence".

There are also lawyers who believe thatAccording to the content of the report, the two boys in this case died accidentally, and the owner of the car does not bear criminal or civil liability, and the main responsibility lies with the guardian

Ma Jinlin, a senior partner of Beijing Yingke (Guangzhou) Law Firm, believes thatWhether the vehicle owner should foresee that the failure to make it clear that the door is locked will lead to unauthorized entry and death, and whether there is subjective negligenceThe determination of this issue is not clearly defined by laws and regulations, and needs to be determined according to general living habits, and there is also some controversy.

He said,If it is considered that the vehicle owner has a certain duty of care to him, it can be further determined whether he should bear criminal liability or civil tort liability for negligent death according to the level of the duty of care

Ding Jinkun, a lawyer at Shanghai Dabang Law Firm, believes that the responsibility of the car owner is not heavy or even none, and the main or all responsibility lies with the guardian. “It is normal for children to be active and play in the car, but after all, they are still young and ignorant and need the presence of a guardian。Therefore, if the guardian is seriously derelict in his duties, he must bear legal responsibility (including criminal and civil liability).

In fact, the criminal law has been suspected of the crime of negligence causing death, but they are also victims, and many previous cases have not been investigated. ”

Able to take legal action.

The two boys were locked in the car and were found by the owner the next day. At this time, the two boys were already dehydrated and suffocated, and the parents were still wondering if they should blame the owner for compensation from the owner. Parents are understandably experiencing the pain of losing their children, but in this case, it is the irresponsible parents, not the innocent car owners, who need to go through the legal process.

In the current investigation of the incident, two boys got into someone else's car while playing, but the child was eventually found by the owner of the car, and the day after his disappearance, the parents did not go to him. After the child was found, the parents still wanted to blackmail the owner of the car and accused the owner of not locking the car. Such parents are really unreasonable, and having such parents is also a kind of sadness for children.

In fact, in this incident, the owner of the car is not only innocent, but also a victim. It was his own freedom to park the car in his own yard, not to mention a broken lock. When he finally saves the child, even the owner of the car loses a car, but the owner doesn't say anything to his car, but his parents send a Samaritan first.

If you say so, then the Sun will pay compensation to your parents in this matter. Who told you that the sun is so big and the temperature is so high? It's a bit like the elevator solicitation to smoke incident before.

It is clear that the teacher made a mistake, his temper is too short, he struggles with heart disease, he is old and bad, you are weak, you are right, and I am right to reproach others for moral deception.

I don't know the mentality of the parents of these two boys. They didn't notice for a long time that their children were missing, but they were eventually found by the owner. Normal parents and children will rush to find them when they are out of sight.

As guardians of children, they have no sense of responsibility at all. Their children are young and ignorant, but they are adults.

Also, in today's society, some parents are easy to report. Isn't it their real educational responsibility? Everything is blamed on external conditions, and it is this that gives children a bad education.

If children are well educated in nature, when they see the worst, they will only feel wrong instead of learning, and nature that does not learn well will not be much better. Seek attention and praise.

The car owner can take legal action, and this is the fundamental solution to such problems. Because it is no longer possible to reach a consensus through private coordination.

Yes. The law is very fair, and car owners will be able to seek justice for themselves by taking legal measures.

OK. It has been the second day since the two children were found, and it was not found by the parents, which shows that the parents have no sense of responsibility, and their children don't care about it, and the parents have greater responsibility.