What are the possible conflicts between an only child and a non only child?

Conflicts may include the division of family property between the two parties (this mainly involves the non-sole party), the support of the parents of both parties, and the conflict of interests of the brothers and sisters of the non-sole party, etc., the most important thing is the run-in and matching degree of the three views between the two people who are married, that is, the conflict of concepts, after all, the growth environment of the two parties is completely different, and there will be some conflicts that are inevitable, and the problem is not big. If the three views of the two sides are compatible, it will be a problem and it will be easier to solve.

Therefore, it can be said that to a large extent, the conflict has nothing to do with the family, but with the two people who are married. People who want to blame other reasons for what they are responsible for are irresponsible people, and there must be many problems.

Regardless of the only child and the only child, the only child and the non-only child will have contradictions, in marriage, we must communicate, understand, tolerate, humble, family and everything will be prosperous, the contradiction will be resolved, there is a contradiction to be resolved, and the contradiction cannot be intensified.

In addition, this also depends on each other's feelings. The contradiction between "marriage between an only child and a non-only child" should not be used to restrain feelings, and emotional matters should not be affected by other factors.

I'm afraid you won't believe it and say more, the only child friend around me, when he got married, his parents and his girlfriend's parents never met, because he knew that there were many problems in meeting, which he handled single-handedly, and the marriage did not require parents to pay a penny, everything was solved by themselves, no one dared to say that one was bad, and they were very happy. Is it understandable that people who have the ability have no problems, and those who are looking for problems are incompetent?

There is a great conflict of concepts, the only child will think more about himself and feel less about his relatives, while the non-only child will think more about the feelings and thoughts of his family, especially on the issue of financial assistance to relatives, there is a great contradiction.

After marriage, non-only children may have a big contradiction in the face of providing for their parents' pension, and everyone feels that they have contributed the most money and effort, and they are afraid of suffering. Another is that after a hundred years of parents, the ownership of the house has to quarrel again.

The concept of money will be different, the only child only needs to take care of himself, but the only child also has to consider his own siblings, so the only child will be more generous in terms of money, and the only child may be more budget-conscious.

There will be a conflict in the concept of help. Non-independent families have siblings and will naturally need help from time to time, while only children have no experience and experience in this area, and they are not very acceptable.

There will be a big conflict in the family education method, because the only child is more spoiled by the child, but the non-only child has to share the burden from an early age.

It must be a contradiction between family concepts, the environment in which an only child lives since he was a child is completely different from that of a non-single-child family.

Economically, only children tend to be extravagant, while non-only children tend to be more frugal, so there will be conflicts.

There may be some conceptual conflicts, after all, the growth environment of the two sides is completely different, and some conflicts are inevitable, and there are not big problems.

Why can't you marry an only child? I don't think I can marry an only child. It doesn't make sense. There is no scientific basis for this.

In fact, find an only child to marry. I think it should be better. Parents of an only child.

Basically, all of them. Living in the city. There is work.

There is also pension insurance and medical insurance. And relatively. All have a certain amount of income savings.

Because it was an only child, that era. Anyone who has a job, especially a relatively stable job. It's basically about having a child.

If you dare to have a second child. That's to be expelled. Or some other severe punishment.

So it's basically a child. Some people always feel that they are only children. There are many elderly people who need to be taken care of.

Actually, now it seems. An old man with an only child. I don't need much of your care.

They basically have a pension. can support themselves. Child allowance is not required.

In turn, their surplus money will be subsidized for their children. So I don't think there's anything wrong with marrying an only child. Why did you suddenly think of this topic?

Both husband and wife are only children. After getting married. It's also good, there is nothing bad about it.

Both of our parents work in state-owned enterprises. Therefore, the two of us also work in state-owned enterprises. Income for two people per month.

It's about 20,000 yuan. The monthly income of both parents. It's also around 15,000 yuan.

All four are retired. We also only had one child. I don't want a second child and a third child either.

All four seniors were able to find time to help us with the kids. Pick up and drop off children to and from school. Isn't that a great thing?

The elderly do not need to be taken care of at all, their own income is fully sufficient and they all have medical insurance. Of course, they may be getting older. At that time, a child photo may be required.

But with their current financial means. It is entirely possible to hire a nanny to take care of it. It's just that if we are busy with work, we can often take time to check it out.

Now these four old men. 60s. It is also better to take care of your body.

At least for the time being, there are no worries.

In short, no matter how you look at it. I didn't see anything bad about marrying an only child. Look at those who are not only children.

in our age group. Basically, mothers are unemployed. It is precisely because there was no work back then that the supervision was not so strict.

to have a chance to have a second child and a third child. There are many children in the family, and the mother has no job, and has always relied on the father to support the family alone. Then his family savings must not be that much.

And you have to manage two or three child marriages. It's basically stretched. Can't help the child at all.

So in every way, I think I'm married to an only child. There is nothing bad about it.

Hello, not being able to marry an only child is a prejudice, different families have different family problems.

1. Only children are relatively more picky. As the only child in the family, the only child must receive more love from an early age, and it is easier to be spoiled, which is a common phenomenon, and the probability of the only child being spoiled is greater. Therefore, whether it is in love or marriage, the requirements will be relatively higher and more picky.

Put yourself in your shoes, if you are a parent of an only child, do you want better conditions when your child gets married?

2. Whether it is an only child or a family with many children, marriage is a big deal. I have seen a multi-child family, because of marriage and the brothers and sisters turned against each other, the old couple is not a person inside and out, whether it is the same or not, there is a gap in the hearts of the children, maybe the conditions you provide are the same, and the multi-child family also has its own difficult scriptures. Many only children cherish each other more after getting married, because they know that it is their own dependence.

So it's a prejudice not to marry an only child.

3. No matter who you marry, all the conditions must be met. In the current situation, a car and a house are necessary, whether it is a full payment or a loan, without these two things, it is more difficult for marriage in many cases. Therefore, it is still necessary to work hard, work hard to earn money, make your life very abundant, and when you don't have to worry about these material conditions, you can find a relatively more suitable one for yourself when you get married.

Only children also have the benefits of being an only child, only by understanding this person, can we really feel the true feelings of the other party, and when you enter marriage, you must not be because of the so-called pressure, but to go both ways.

It is pure nonsense that you can't marry an only child, and only children are normal people, so let's not look at them with some colored eyes.

Whether you are an only child or not, you should not be tied to the label that you must get married and have children. The place where a person can obtain peace and tranquility by himself is his own home, and in the final analysis, people must learn to live with loneliness, rather than always taking others as sustenance, and it is impossible for a partner to accompany them for a lifetime.

What's more, you can find a reliable sustenance, not just a random one can find, a person's life is nothing more than occasionally feeling lonely, finding the wrong partner, and losing one's life, especially for women, the risk of marriage is much greater than that of singleness. Now young people's attitudes have changed, they know very well what they want their life to look like, and they don't get married for the sake of getting married. Getting married means that you will be facing three families, and three different families, and the days of marriage in order to get married will be a mess, which is irresponsible for yourself and your other half.

So, you can get married with an only child!

The disadvantages of being an only child are not that most of them are pampered from an early age, unsociable, and so on. With the arrival of the peak of our first generation of one-child marriage and love, the disadvantages of the combination of one-child families and one-child families have gradually emerged.

1.There is a lack of inclusivity, and the marriage is a little less resilient. Couples who are both only children are more likely to have conflicting divorces after they get married.

Among them, the parents of both sides also played a big role. **There are husbands and wives who don't make trouble, and the parents of ordinary families learn that there is a conflict between the two parties, and most of them will persuade each other to tolerate it. And the family of only children has been spoiled by their children since they were young, and once they hear that their children have been wronged in marriage, it is easy to lose proportion and justice.

Therefore, many couples have a breakdown in their relationship because of the involvement and instigation of both parents.

2.The pressure of pension should not be underestimated. The premise of happiness in a single-child family is that both parents have a pension and are in good health, and there is no need for young people to bear the financial burden.

Once the health of the four elderly people begins to have problems, the work of the husband and wife can not be let go for too long, and the difficulties faced by the elderly and the small are unimaginable for families with many children.

3.Fertility stress. I don't know if you have noticed that the couples who are now clamoring for only one child every day are basically multi-child families, and those couples who are united by one-child families are silently responding to the call of the country and working hard to have a second child.

Because I have experienced the growth of an only child and know the difficulties that an only child needs to face, I hope that my child can have a different life.

The family is like a big machine, only when every link is done step by step, each performing its own duties, and without problems, our life will be really smooth sailing. This is especially true for families with only one child. The elderly, children, husband and wife, work, every link must not have major problems, once one link is suspended, then the whole family will fall into a quagmire.

Why is it better not to look for a family with only one child? First of all, sweet before bitter will lower people's expectations of life. The days of bitter and then sweet will make people have hope, and couples who are united by one-child families usually have a bad start, but the more the days pass, the heavier the responsibilities and burdens, the sweeter and then the bitter will make people have a psychological gap, reducing people's expectations of life.

When people's lives are trapped in life, the contradictions will become more and more numerous and irreconcilable.

Now, with the two-child policy.

Many families have given birth to a second child, and many of them are unwilling to have a second child, so they just want to raise a child. Having one child and having two children have both good and bad aspects, which should be considered according to the actual situation of the family, whether to have one child or two children. A child from a family with one child is an only child, while a child from a family with two children is not an only child.

What is the difference between an only child and a non-only child?

1. The family environment in which I grew up is different

Children from single-child families have only one child at home since they were young, and several adults grow up around a child, and they will generally love the child more, and will invest most of their energy, time, and money into the child, and the child will get more love from an early age, and the material conditions of life will generally be more abundant; Children from non-single-child families have a companion from an early age, and their parents will not spend their energy and money on one of them, and their material conditions are relatively poorer from an early age. <>

2. There are differences in personality

Children from single-child families are generally more willful and self-conscious in personality because they have been pampered by their families since they were young, and they do not know how to understand the feelings of others, and they are more alone; Children from non-single-child families will be accompanied by friends from an early age, and they will generally know how to take care of each other and understand each other's feelings.

3. The burden on parents' pension will be different in the future

Children from single-child families will have to bear the pension of their own two elderly people in the future, and the pressure will be greater; Non-single-child families can bear the care of their parents for both, with less pressure. <>

In short, I think that a family can have two children if they have the conditions, so that the children have a companionship with each other, which is also beneficial to the cultivation of their character, and at the same time, they will bear less responsibility for the elderly in the future. Of course, children from single-child families and children from non-single-child families are not all the same as I said above, in fact, as long as the family is educated.

Well, the difference between an only child and a non-only child is not too big.