-
This is a personal opinion and does not refer to any network knowledge.
Pros: 1: You can concentrate the strength of the whole country to complete the strategic development ideas of the country's high-level, and the country's willpower has been well exerted, and you can see that the Soviet Union has developed the industrial base from Eastern Europe to the Ural Mountains in Siberia, and laid the position of the leader of heavy industry for more than half a century in one fell swoop;
2: Under this economic system, the state can better play the leverage role of macroeconomic regulation and control, combined with the law of the market economy itself, when the political top does not make mistakes in the direction, the will of the country can penetrate into all fields of economic development, and at the same time, it can also well resist the situation of foreign-funded enterprises compressing the living space of national enterprises;
3: Such a system can isolate the domestic economy from the world economy to a certain extent, and avoid a large-scale global depression.
Disadvantages: I personally feel that the highly centralized market economy is destined to be eliminated by history, and now only five countries in the world recognize socialism, and the best of them have begun to move closer to the market economy, and strongly hope that the United States will recognize its market economy status.
First, the directional errors of the decision-making level have been transmitted to the entire national economy repeatedly, and the self-adjustment ability of the market economy cannot play its due role under this economic system.
Third: it curbs the development of the business sector. The modern economy belongs to the 6+1 model, and the highly centralized economic system is useless, which greatly curbs the innovation of the domestic market in sales, logistics, warehousing and other links, resulting in economic development addiction and lifelessness;
Fourth, a long-term centralized economic system is prone to derailment from the advanced international economic model and cannot enjoy the benefits of globalization.
Fifth, it is easy to make the trajectory of economic development follow the willpower of the country's top leaders, but it invisibly forms abnormal development, such as the policy of heavy industry and light agriculture in the later period of the Soviet Union.
-
Both the plan and the market are means. The highly centralized planned economic model can concentrate the manpower, material resources and resources of the whole country, develop in accordance with the instructions and plans of the first country, and ultimately ensure the completion of the economic plan, industrialization and collective agriculture are the fastest shortcuts to rapidly increase the economic and military strength of the Soviet Union. However, in the same era, Western countries developed their economies freely according to market demand, with almost no intervention, but the market was blind and lagged, so in the 30s of the 20th century, almost all capitalist countries fell into a stage of economic stagnation, and finally an economic crisis broke out.
Therefore, the highly centralized planned economic model enabled the Soviet Union to catch up with some advanced capitalist countries in a short time. However, any economic policy and means have their two sides, for example, the planned economy also has its serious drawbacks, the most fatal of which is that under the guidance of this model, the Soviet Union only attaches importance to the development of heavy industry, and despises the development of light industry, civilian industry, and agriculture, resulting in a serious imbalance in the national economy, the country seems to be rich and powerful, but the people's living standards have not improved as a result, all of which ultimately restrict the further in-depth development of the national economy. Therefore, it hinders the sustainable development of productive forces.
-
You can refer to China's economic system and you can understand.
-
Highly centralized political and economic system: In the economic aspect, it is characterized by a highly centralized planned economic system, which denies the role of the law of value and the market mechanism, restricts commodity-money relations, and manages the economy by administrative orders; In terms of politics, it is characterized by:
Power is highly centralized, there is no separation between the party and the government, and there is a lack of mass supervision.
This highly centralized system was basically compatible with the level of development of the social productive forces in the Soviet Union at that time, and played a positive role in history. The great achievements of the Soviet Union in the twenties and thirties were achieved under this system. However, this system had serious shortcomings and drawbacks, which later increasingly hindered the development of the national economy and the reform of the political system of the Soviet Union.
-
To put it simply, it means that the state uses a directive plan to manage all economic activities, restricts commodity-money relations, denies the role of the market, and uses the practice of depriving the peasants and restricting the population from raising their living standards to achieve high accumulation, increase investment, and one-sided development of heavy industry.
-
After the establishment of the socialist system, a highly centralized planned economic system was gradually formed.
The socialist system is a political and economic system as opposed to the capitalist system. The basic elements of this are the practice of public ownership and the realization that the people are the masters of the country. It refers to the activities of socialist state organs in creating, recognizing, amending, and repealing laws and normative legal documents within the scope of their legally prescribed powers and in accordance with legal procedures.
The planned economy, or the planned economic system, also known as the command economy, is an economic system, and in this system, the state in terms of production, resource distribution and product consumption, are planned in advance by the first or consortium. Since almost all planned economic systems rely on the command plan of the first place, the planned economy is also called the "command economy". The remaining three economic systems are the market economy system, the traditional economic system, and the mixed economic system.
Both depend on the political system associated with their country, that is, the state system; >>>More
It's more comprehensive, in favor of the first floor!
China's market economy system was formed in 1992.
The Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in December 1978. >>>More
Summary. We'd love to answer for you.
1. Sweden's economy is a mixed economy. State-owned enterprises (SOEs) account for a large proportion of public utilities, transportation, and industrial and mining industries. Sweden is one of the countries with the highest level of social welfare in the West, and due to the continuous expansion of social welfare, even though the proportion of fiscal expenditure in GDP is increasing. >>>More
Capitalist private ownership economy, this is the concept.